Weird Segmentata armour (split from Javelins with fletching)
I was linked to this french forum by a friend... http://mediaephile.com/forum/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1219063763 ... where I found the images.

[ Linked Image ]
obj 00074028,T:
Frankreich, Des cas des nobles hommes et femmes, 1458, Handschrift, München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.
Fouquet, Jean, Buchausstattung.
Antiochus III., König von Syrien, Miniatur (in der Kolumne)
Inventar-Nr. Cod. gall. 6
I think my brain will force me to have a replica of this. if only there was a surviving example of this... Any idea how this would be constructed?
I think he is one of PJs elves.....

Maybe it is textile armour? I cannot imagine it'd work very well over other armour of this time.

RPM
Very reminiscent of the Elve's armour in LotR, particularly the ones with the "nagamaki" like polearm/swords in the battle scene at the start
Well in the movie, that armour was done in one piece, It might be worth considering that because it looks segmented doesnt neccesarily mean the plates slip and slide etc. It might be just a funny way of presenting a more rigid piece of armour.

If it does move, I am willing to bet the plates are mostely attatched to each other in the middle, when you bend, the plates can slide freely and are probab;y partly attatched to each other by leathers not unlike the negmentata.
Considering that the image depicts Antiochus III, the King of Syria, I think that there is a distinct possibility that some of the armour depicted is fanciful, even if the majority of it was contemporary. Note the style of spaulders that the king is wearing - it is a conventional depiction of antique armour, used on ancients, angels, etc. It is also possible that the segmented armour was actually intended to depict a Roman lorica segmentata, considering that Antiochus was defeated by Rome in 192 BC.
Jeffrey Hildebrandt wrote:
Considering that the image depicts Antiochus III, the King of Syria, I think that there is a distinct possibility that some of the armour depicted is fanciful, even if the majority of it was contemporary. Note the style of spaulders that the king is wearing - it is a conventional depiction of antique armour, used on ancients, angels, etc. It is also possible that the segmented armour was actually intended to depict a Roman lorica segmentata, considering that Antiochus was defeated by Rome in 192 BC.


Bingo. It's a deliberate "archaism" to represent a soldier from ancient times. The king looks a little neo-Classical as well.

Matthew
Found these "History of Rome" examples on manuscriptminiatures.com which seen to support a textile armor.
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/search/?manus...ne-71-a-17
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
[ Linked Image ]
Another contemporary model:
http://manuscriptminiatures.com/des-cas-des-n...1901/3073/
[ Linked Image ]
Could this be lmprovised armour from rolled cloth? If you had cloth but no time or skilled tailor around to make a proper jack from it?
Could be. But all these examples look very different to me than the first one that started the thread and looks too precise geometrically to be textile armor.
Matthew Amt wrote:
Jeffrey Hildebrandt wrote:
Considering that the image depicts Antiochus III, the King of Syria, I think that there is a distinct possibility that some of the armour depicted is fanciful, even if the majority of it was contemporary. Note the style of spaulders that the king is wearing - it is a conventional depiction of antique armour, used on ancients, angels, etc. It is also possible that the segmented armour was actually intended to depict a Roman lorica segmentata, considering that Antiochus was defeated by Rome in 192 BC.


Bingo. It's a deliberate "archaism" to represent a soldier from ancient times. The king looks a little neo-Classical as well.

Matthew


Another vote for deliberate classicism. Given that the subjects illustrated are all from classical antiquity, I would say the artist is attempting to depict a lorica segmenta from descriptions he's read in surviving copies of classical texts or maybe was just told "In the old days they wore armour made of bands, draw something like that."

It's like a historian 600 years in the future trying to reconstruct French 17th century military uniforms and equipment from an illustrated Alexandre Dumas book published in the 1950s.

That isn't to say that I would frown on a reconstruction of the armour depicted in the manuscript. I'm pretty keen on making a kit modeled after some of the 14th cent Italian paintings/frescoes of antiquity. A coat of plates that looks like a linothorax or spolas? How cool is that!

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum