Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 10:37 am
John Smith's Falchion
Posts: 1,191 Location: Kingston, Washington
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 11:05 am
Smith's Falchion
Gee, I didn't realize that this John Smith was a Texan! ;o)
Seriously though, there are lots of interesting illustrations from the 17th and early 18th Centuries showing clip-point swords of this type, such as the engravings from Daniel Defoe's book on pirates "History of the most notorious Pyrates" including one of Ned Teach (Blackbeard) himself. Strange that such a beast would be so common in illustrations but so rare in collections: perhaps it became a 'literary figure of speech" as it were, engraver's shorthand for "this is a sword for doing close, ugly work" or some such. Seems as though Thomas Tew's Jolly Roger had such a sword emblazoned on it too.
At any rate, this is something that has intrigued me as well for some time, perhaps someone has some solid information on these rather rare beasts.
Gordon Frye
Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 11:25 am
Exactly! Peterson's Arms & Armor of Colonial America shows two such pirate illustrations as well as the badly corroded remains of an excavated example of the weapon type they're shown holding. That weapon is of the more familiar shell-guard form, but is otherwise very similar to Smith's. The blades of those weapons might not be quite as wide as Smith's falchion. I haven't seen much light shed on the difference, if any, between a cutlass, hanger or falchion of the era in question. E.B. Erickson and I were comiserating last week about the dearth of sword replicas for this period. Rapiers abound, of course. But where are the military/utilitarian cutting swords of 1600-1700? MRL's Badelaire and German Falchion are good candidates for DIY updating to 17th c. form (especially the Badelaire--see below). Alchem sells a 1.75" steel ball pommel for around $16. Might be too small for that weapon, though.
Attachment: 20.99 KB

Posts: 51 Location: Irving, TX
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 1:08 pm
Grab a biography on Smith: you'll be surprised at how much use he got out of choppers like that...
Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 1:29 pm
Him and many other early colonists! Makes sense. Cheap, sturdy, short--the sword, I mean, not Smith (although....). Frankly, I don't quite understand why rapiers were so popular in the early colonies, and why so few falchions/hangers/cutlasses have turned up in the archaeological record. Maybe they were so sturdy that they continued in use and gradually were honed down to nothing, shortened or reshaped for agricultural use or butchery. Those colonists were resourceful recyclers when they chose to be. I'm bursting to say more on this subject but can't at the moment.....
Posts: 1,191 Location: Kingston, Washington
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 2:33 pm
Choppers and Falchions
Sean, I suspect that you are on the money with the idea that the choppers like Smith's were simply used and reused until there just wasn't anything left of them. As a rancher friend of mine said, if something doesn't live at least three different lives on the ranch, it was a bad investment (he was speaking of shotgun barrels turned into fence-posts, and about to be turned into something else). I should think that the falchions would make dandy scythes, frankly. Or plowshares for that matter.
It really seems as though such short swords were popular throughout the period from the late Middle Ages through to the end of cold steel as a useful battlefield implement. There is an interesting wood-cut from around 1600 showing muskets and swords being issued out to Dutch troops after their being listed and attested. Along with the rapiers, there are also large numbers of what I should refer to as Dusack's shown too. Makes perfect sense to me, actually, since using a rapier takes a certain amount of training and skill, while a chopper is just what it is, here, go to work! Just like the cutlass of the later period, really.
Could it be that the reason more rapier parts are seen in dumps is that they were more likely to be tossed into them, where as the shorter weapons could find other uses? Interesting points to discuss...
Gordon Frye
Posts: 21
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 2:42 pm
Maybe the falchions all got used up as they would make good cane knives, machetes, kindling cutters, froes, and kids toys. They're also better weapons for fighting Indians. The rapiers probably just sat in a corner until some good story about grandpa being heroic got attached to them.
Posts: 30 Location: Cotonou, Benin
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 3:10 pm
I was recently in west Africa, where (once you get out into the country) you see machetes everywhere. although most of them seem to start life as with same (now mass-produced) wide blade about a foot and a half or more long, many of them were worn down to the size of steak knives and still being used for everything from butching livestock to chopping open coconuts. I also read Chinua Achebe's great book "Things Fall Apart" which is set in what is now Nigeria around the time white men started to make contact with inland tribespeople. although the book is by no means a historical work, it describes the machete as a weapon and a tool. men wear it to war and to the field. although I got off subject a little there, I think the west african example parallels the use of short, wide, curved blades as versatile tools and effective weapons.
Cheers
Dan
Posts: 1,001 Location: Roanoke,Va
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 6:23 pm
[quote="Sean Flynt"] . E.B. Erickson and I were comiserating last week about the dearth of sword replicas for this period. Rapiers abound, of course. But where are the military/utilitarian cutting swords of 1600-1700? MRL's Badelaire and German Falchion are good candidates for DIY updating to 17th c. form quote]
Hey Sean,
Mortuary's,proto-mortuary's,& more mortuary's! Sorry, couldn't help myself there Agreed, I'd also love to see more replica's of this time period. And as far as the Falchion goes, Von Sussen Enterprises makes model similar to the MRL, quillons and pommel are a bit different. I guess some hangers & the
schiavona's can be put into this time zone.
Bill
Posts: 146
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 7:31 pm
Even *modern* militaries are begining to come around to the idea of well-made ancient weapons.
Rangers, as many of you have no doubt heard, have been recently issued tomahawks as part of their personal kits, after word of their extreme usefulness filtered back through the command chain. Army brass is still skeptical, but the troops are enthusiastic.
Machetes have long been recognized as useful tools and weapons, but are often poorly balanced and have bad
blade geometry -the soldiers just say they're hard to use. Yet, an entire Special Forces team ordered Cold Steel Kukris and sent back grateful reviews about their utility. Ditch the machete, design a falchion. I've used both, and I'll tell you which one is more useful in a heartbeat! Every solder or marine that I've convinced to try one agrees with me immediately. ;)
Posts: 198
Wed 08 Sep, 2004 9:29 pm
I really love the look of MRL's thorpe falchion and would love to see it reproduced by someone of quality. The Lutel one is ok. Albions upcoming one is sexy too but $1,000 is more than I can justify at this point.
Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Thu 09 Sep, 2004 5:55 am
The MRL falchion may be better than you'd think. If you haven't already seen my review of this replica, it's here:
http://www.myArmoury.com/review_mrl_falc.html
It's good to see that so many folks are interested in 17th c. edged weapons. Maybe somebody out there is listening!
Posts: 73
Thu 09 Sep, 2004 2:28 pm
don't knock the 'chetes
David R. Glier wrote: |
Even *modern* militaries are begining to come around to the idea of well-made ancient weapons.
Rangers, as many of you have no doubt heard, have been recently issued tomahawks as part of their personal kits, after word of their extreme usefulness filtered back through the command chain. Army brass is still skeptical, but the troops are enthusiastic.
Machetes have long been recognized as useful tools and weapons, but are often poorly balanced and have bad blade geometry -the soldiers just say they're hard to use. Yet, an entire Special Forces team ordered Cold Steel Kukris and sent back grateful reviews about their utility. Ditch the machete, design a falchion. I've used both, and I'll tell you which one is more useful in a heartbeat! Every solder or marine that I've convinced to try one agrees with me immediately. ;) |
um, I agree that a lot of machetes are poorly made and balanced. however I have used a lot of them and found that two that look nearly identical can perform very differently. (the good ones are thin, springy and should reach to your toe in a relaxed stance, their edge can be improved with a quick belt sanding. the crappy ones are short stiff and thick. transmits force to hand rather than target) their edge geometry is better than a sword for their purpose. i have found that i can usually chop a tree down quicker with a machete than with an axe or a hatchet. the kukri behaves more like a clumsy hatchet than a slashy cutter. too short and too heavy. it is primarily shaped that way from tradition.
I would love to see more falcheons, schweitsersabels sp?, hangers, and cutlasses. they seem more of an everyman's sword. (as someone noted earlier. their techniques are self explanatory.) furthermore they are good for more than just hacking up peoples in your way. you can see why tfalcheons and cutlasses were used on ships so much. they were short. too much rigging and crew and stuff in the way on a ship for stuff like zweihanders. they were easy. they cut well. in a naval fight you have to cutt of grapple lines, trialing spars and rigging, and hands with jewelry. also everyghing is lurching around so much that you can't afford to be fancy. you just slash, stab and move on before the deck gets too slippery.
also does any one have any pics of those arab type falcheons that often get called scimitars?or the correct name perhaps? (the big slave guy who gets killed has one in the movie Hidalgo)
Posts: 285
Sat 11 Sep, 2004 10:44 am
I had a similar experience to Dan Tucker's when I was in Ghana several years ago. It wasn't unusual to see large kitchen knives that had been ground from machetes. There origins were evident in the stamped grooves on the blade (too shallow to call fullers) and in their grips. Here machetes were such a staple that all large knives seemed to have been ground from old machetes. The fact that machetes are called cutlasses there and in India supports the theory that falchions were often used up as wood knives.
As to Zach's observations on machetes and kukris, I have found kukris too be every bit as varied in there form and performance as machetes if not more so. Some are useless while others are among the most efficient choppers I have ever encountered. The original Blackjack/Reinhardt kukri and AC's Assam Rifles kukris fit the latter category.
Posts: 724 Location: Oklahoma
Sun 12 Sep, 2004 10:53 am
Re: John Smith's Falchion
Sean Flynt wrote: |
Has anybody seen this weapon?--clipped point, wide fuller, ball pommel, simple recurved quillons?
|
I found this today on the Del Tin WEb site, it looks pretty similar, recurved quillons,what might be a ball pumel, a little hard to tell though, and clip point. I Thought you might be intrested.
Attachment: 5.57 KB

Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Mon 13 Sep, 2004 6:05 am
Mmmm...love the hilt. Hate the blade. Looks like the pommel is discoidal. That may actually be what we're looking at in the Smith illustration. Thanks for the image!
Posts: 455 Location: Thailand
Mon 13 Sep, 2004 6:06 am
Ever since Sean posted it last week, the engraving of Smith's falchion has been ringing faint bells, and I think I remember where I saw something similar.
In the
Wallace collection catalogs, they have a couple of Italian falchions/sabers from the early 1600s that are close to what is shown in the engraving. If I remember correctly, one has a rounded pommel with a spiral design and countercurved quillons, but I don't recall a clipped point to the blade.
Anyone have a copy of the catalogs handy to check it out?
--ElJay
Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Mon 13 Sep, 2004 6:13 am
Very interesting...I wondered if it might have been something he picked up on the Continent.
Posts: 5,739 Location: Wichita, Kansas
Mon 13 Sep, 2004 12:48 pm
E.B. Erickson wrote: |
Ever since Sean posted it last week, the engraving of Smith's falchion has been ringing faint bells, and I think I remember where I saw something similar.
In the Wallace collection catalogs, they have a couple of Italian falchions/sabers from the early 1600s that are close to what is shown in the engraving. If I remember correctly, one has a rounded pommel with a spiral design and countercurved quillons, but I don't recall a clipped point to the blade.
Anyone have a copy of the catalogs handy to check it out?
--ElJay |
Wallace catalog Vol II
Plate 110, item A710: This is the Medici Falchion that A&A has replicated. Countercurved guard, lions head pommel, cliped point.
Plate 130, item A717: 17th century, blade inscribed EDWARDUS PRINS ANGLIE, clipped point, downward curving guard with a semi-knucklebow, knightshead pommel
Plate 131, item A712: Italian 16th-17th centuries. Countercurved guard, semi-birdshead pommel with a spiral design, clipped point with a pronounced false edge (I think this is the one you're refering to Eljay).
Posts: 455 Location: Thailand
Tue 14 Sep, 2004 5:34 am
Hi Patrick,
I think you've got it! Any chance of a scan?
--ElJay
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum