Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Another author's question Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next 
Author Message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Fri 18 Nov, 2011 8:53 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

R Ashby wrote:

A poleaxe or lucerne hammer is a natural choice, except I'd have a dickens of a time writing about the technical aspects of using one- too complex for my humble skills. I have enough trouble with a longsword.



Buying this DVD on the Poleaxe should give you a decent idea about the uses of the Poleaxe and the fact that it's a DVD and not just a book you should be able to write action scenes that are " credible " as you would have seen some of it in actual movement rather than trying to figure out what happens from text and still pictures in a book. Wink Big Grin Cool

http://www.freelanceacademypress.com/poleaxedvd.aspx

The other DVDs and books available on this site by this publisher could also be useful for you in writing action scenes.
http://www.freelanceacademypress.com/videos.aspx

Just recently bought the Sword and shield DVD and the Bartitsu DVD that I haven't had time to look at yet but if they are as good as the Longsword DVD and the Polaxe DVD they would be very useful to gain a better understanding of all of the period martial arts and the different weapons used.

Oh, the Goedendag is probably your best peasant weapon as it combines the impact of a mace with some decent reach in a long handled version and the top spike similar in effectiveness to the top spike of a Poleaxe.

http://www.arms-n-armor.com/custom935.html

I think the Goedendag was particularly effective before plate became common as the top spike could pierce maille I believe and the blunt impact being effective as well.

For peasants against Knights the long handled flail could be devastating and because it was based on a common agricultural implement that peasants would have been very used to using, they might be more effective with them than if the peasants tried to use Poleaxes ..... Oh, as Dan sort of mentioned, peasants against Knights works best against one or few knights and lots and LOTS of peasants.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Fri 18 Nov, 2011 10:07 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I fight insurgents; I have better armor, better vehicles better weapons. They attack from ambush, use IEDs and a pretty effective information campaign
So, if you have half trained, motivated, cold, hungry ‘peasants’, two of them might pop a few arrow shots at the knight and run. The Knight gives chase and falls in to a tiger pit horse and all, is knocked from his horse with the neck high rope trick or hit with a dead fall log. Gruesome but a peasant heaves a Molotov cocktail at a night in full armor (if the night is evil, locked some peasants in a building and burnt them alive it would be a perfect end for him.
A three to four foot length of half inch to three quarters inch chain. If your knight has an open face help, no armor on his elbows or knees chain is nasty. It can swing around shields or a weapon and still hit the target. Chain to the face would destroy a knights ability to fight.
Threshing flails for grain, a small pick for rock, hammer, any number of tools.
Somebody once said that war was dirty nasty business and General Lee said that it was a good thing that war is so terrible least we learn to love it too much. When the underdog has to fight the better equipped and trained the underdog must use everything at his disposal. Perhaps Lancelot even in his fallen state would not be un-chivalrous so the chain comes to mind for him, he is without armor or the tools of war afforded nobility, but a chain or stout club in the hands of ‘the brightest and best of us’ would be a terrible weapon to face.

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
R Ashby





Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Likes: 6 pages

Posts: 103

PostPosted: Fri 18 Nov, 2011 11:15 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

David Lewis Smith wrote:
I fight insurgents; I have better armor, better vehicles better weapons. They attack from ambush, use IEDs and a pretty effective information campaign
So, if you have half trained, motivated, cold, hungry ‘peasants’, two of them might pop a few arrow shots at the knight and run. The Knight gives chase and falls in to a tiger pit horse and all, is knocked from his horse with the neck high rope trick or hit with a dead fall log. Gruesome but a peasant heaves a Molotov cocktail at a night in full armor (if the night is evil, locked some peasants in a building and burnt them alive it would be a perfect end for him.
A three to four foot length of half inch to three quarters inch chain. If your knight has an open face help, no armor on his elbows or knees chain is nasty. It can swing around shields or a weapon and still hit the target. Chain to the face would destroy a knights ability to fight.
Threshing flails for grain, a small pick for rock, hammer, any number of tools.
Somebody once said that war was dirty nasty business and General Lee said that it was a good thing that war is so terrible least we learn to love it too much. When the underdog has to fight the better equipped and trained the underdog must use everything at his disposal. Perhaps Lancelot even in his fallen state would not be un-chivalrous so the chain comes to mind for him, he is without armor or the tools of war afforded nobility, but a chain or stout club in the hands of ‘the brightest and best of us’ would be a terrible weapon to face.


A fascinating aspect of this discussion I had not considered! Thank you so much!

Jean- I'll have a look- DVD's are good- youtube has been awesome, though requiring a big grain of salt sometimes.

As for the murder aspect- I think I'll fashion the character like an old west gunfighter, or a ronin samurai, who wanders about and just gets into trouble by not being a part of social structures.
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:42 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

R Ashby wrote:
[
Jean- I'll have a look- DVD's are good- youtube has been awesome, though requiring a big grain of salt sometimes.


Youtube can be a good or a very bad source and hard to tell which when one doesn't have any expertise in a subject, but the DVDs I suggested are from a credible source, made by very credible people, based on period texts and period techniques so that at least you can use them as a baseline to judge the credibility of other stuff you might find on Youtube, and in themselves something sure on which to base your fictional fighting.

You don't need to learn it to the point that you could perform the actions yourself but enough that you can write about it in a believable and exciting way, describing the action while avoiding the technical jargon that most readers couldn't understand.

Anyway, the point is to point you in useful directions for your research and hope that it is helpful.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
R Ashby





Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Likes: 6 pages

Posts: 103

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 1:50 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I'll have a look Jean- it's a perfect resource.
View user's profile Send private message
William P




Location: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 11 Jul 2010

Posts: 1,523

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 3:30 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

i thought the purpose of the godendag was it was used in something of a phalanx, the spike made it hard for enemies to simply charge them, and the fact it was a club allowed them to hit them close quartrs

note that some of the nastiest weapons in japan is the otsuchi i.e a BIG oak mallet, the kanabo (alot like the godendag, its a long tapering wooden club with a heap of iron studs, there are one handed verisions, i mean a tree branch with some long nails jammed in so that both ends of the nail are sticking out of the piece of wood,

'in ww1 we see just how lethal a sharpened shovel could be,

thye flail is a good idea, all you would need to do would be maybe add bands of iron to the threshing head of the 2 handed flail to make it more durable for one,. and 2, along with naail heads, give it more spikey bits. manning imperial has one abit like that,
google manning imperial.com

although may i point out that the knights had flails as well. different flails but still nasty

as for chains. look at it this way the reason the kusarigama was so nasty was because of the long weighted chain, no matter what part hits you itll still hurt. plus it can trap opponents,

that said, the big long chains we see in modern times would NOT have been common especially not for the access of a peasent.
http://manningimperial.com/item.php?item_id=4...mp;c_id=58 this weapon described as 'basic pole hammer' is very intruiging and doesnt seem impossible for a local blacksmith to make.
http://manningimperial.com/item.php?item_id=4...mp;c_id=58 this is technically a military flail but a agricultural flail wouldnt be that different except with maybe a rope not a chain, and no metal bits.
http://manningimperial.com/item.php?item_id=4...mp;c_id=58

by the way, for the peasent.. does he ONLY have modified farm tools or does he maybe have limited access to some of the cheaper military issue weapons, like maybe a 1 handed axe, dagger, spear, or even a falchion or mace? depending on how expensive these might be. to the common man on the street

by the way by peasent, do you mean that as a term to mean all commoners who arnt also soldiers, or otherwise versed in fighting methods.
or do you mean something abit higher than serfs but still purely farmers
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
R Ashby





Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Likes: 6 pages

Posts: 103

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 3:55 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Maybe I should say commoner over peasant, though a serf's weapon would be ideal, from a symbolic standpoint.
View user's profile Send private message
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 4:30 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Stupid Auto spell check, turning Knight in to night.

David Lewis Smith wrote:
I fight insurgents; I have better armor, better vehicles better weapons. They attack from ambush, use IEDs and a pretty effective information campaign
So, if you have half trained, motivated, cold, hungry ‘peasants’, two of them might pop a few arrow shots at the knight and run. The Knight gives chase and falls in to a tiger pit horse and all, is knocked from his horse with the neck high rope trick or hit with a dead fall log. Gruesome but a peasant heaves a Molotov cocktail at a night in full armor (if the night is evil, locked some peasants in a building and burnt them alive it would be a perfect end for him.
A three to four foot length of half inch to three quarters inch chain. If your knight has an open face help, no armor on his elbows or knees chain is nasty. It can swing around shields or a weapon and still hit the target. Chain to the face would destroy a knights ability to fight.
Threshing flails for grain, a small pick for rock, hammer, any number of tools.
Somebody once said that war was dirty nasty business and General Lee said that it was a good thing that war is so terrible least we learn to love it too much. When the underdog has to fight the better equipped and trained the underdog must use everything at his disposal. Perhaps Lancelot even in his fallen state would not be un-chivalrous so the chain comes to mind for him, he is without armor or the tools of war afforded nobility, but a chain or stout club in the hands of ‘the brightest and best of us’ would be a terrible weapon to face.

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 4:48 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Check here, it is the Klingbiel Collection of medieval weapons,
http://www.pba-auctions.com/html/index.jsp?id=11675

its on acution but there are photos of all sorts of weapons

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 5:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

William,

Not likely. How could a 3 foot stick with maybe a 6 inch spike keep cavalry away? You'd be dead by the lance before the spike got near the knight or the horse. Besides most of the period accounts indicate large numbers of spearmen in the Low Countries during this period so we can safely assume this was theur system, crossbows, spears and godendags. They later add large and small; artillery but seems more of a harrying tactics.

As I said earlier, all these weapons have uses but almost no weapon class/type was able to be the stand alone battle winner.
View user's profile Send private message
Matthew Amt




Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 1,456

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 7:06 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

David Lewis Smith wrote:
So, if you have half trained, motivated, cold, hungry ‘peasants’, two of them might pop a few arrow shots at the knight and run. The Knight gives chase and falls in to a tiger pit horse and all, is knocked from his horse with the neck high rope trick or hit with a dead fall log.


I'd go with a simple trip wire or rope. A pit that size will take a long time to dig, and would be nearly impossible to camouflage.


Quote:
A three to four foot length of half inch to three quarters inch chain. If your knight has an open face help, no armor on his elbows or knees chain is nasty. It can swing around shields or a weapon and still hit the target. Chain to the face would destroy a knights ability to fight.


Would it? It would have to be too heavy to swing fast, unless you wound up for a few revolutions, giving the knight plenty of time to step inside your swing and deck you with his gauntlet. Anything lighter, he can simply catch on his arm and yank it away from you, or pull you into his fist/knee/forehead. Slap him in the face with a chain and I think you're just going to make him very angry! Plus, knees and elbows were the first parts to get plate armor after the head, so not much chance of those being the only exposed spots.


Quote:
Threshing flails for grain, a small pick for rock, hammer, any number of tools.


Most of which were tried at some point, and while a few developed into weapons in their own right, spears, pikes, and halberds or bills of various sorts were the main weapons on any battlefield. Because they worked!

If you really want a peasant to take on a knight, I suspect surprise will be VERY helpful!

Matthew
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 7:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Least I forget; Caltrops. Effective against horses (so is a board with nails across a road when vehicles have inflated rubber tires) and effective against dismounted knights. They are cheap to make, a simple cross of metal with two arms bent about 90 degrees one direction and the other two bent about 90 degrees the other direction. They can be carved out of wood for that matter, the bottoms of broken bottles shard side up.
As for a knight on foot being slow, no, an unarmored ‘knight killer’ of any kind does not have a significant advantage in speed in close and personal. Even running away he might find himself sliced down from behind.
I did not read your other thread so I am not sure what the setting of your book is, so I am not sure of the ‘age’ or technology that your characters are living in. So, on that note….
The simple adage, ‘if you can’t walk you can’t fight’ holds true. A bolo could if applied at the right moment could send a armored target especially at a run face first in to the dirt to be dispatched by axes, hammers and clubs. (Sorry totally in ‘insurgent’ mode). A lasso thrown over an arm or neck could drag a mounted knight off a horse or tie up his arm or yank him off balance.
According to legend Miyamoto Musashi killed another samurai in a duel with a boat oar.
The other thing is if we look at Viking epics very few of them say that ‘Swen and Ollie were fighting, Swen stabbed Ollie in the stomach and killed him’. A good story is epic so it can step outside the bounds of ‘real’ and in to the realm the fantastic but keeping reality makes it a better story. A blacksmith would use a hammer, and many blacksmith hammers were long handled. A broken off spear haft reinforced with iron strips down the shaft would be a good weapon in the hands of a motivated and trained fighter capable of killing an armored ‘knight’. Other things to consider, one cannot spend 100% of one’s time in armor.

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 9:05 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Matt:
I grew up on farm, not farm that had our own backhoe; if you needed a hole you dug it. I am in Afghanistan right now and watch guys dig three foot ditches with shovels and picks. They don’t dig ditches for a mile or more because it’s fun, they do it because water is life. If you had to do something to live, you would do it, it’s a matter of survival. I am also a graduate of the US Army SERE course, it’s not all POW stuff you learn a lot about getting things done with minimal tools and resources. You might be surprised what you could accomplish with proper motivation and a shovel. Special Operations is about thinking outside the box, a ‘knight killer’ with every disadvantage in equipment is going to think outside the box.
On that note, a three foot wide two foot deep hole with spikes in it would kill or maim the horse and send its rider to the ground violently. It’s not that hard to camouflage either, camouflage is not just the hole it is sculpting the area around as well, blending everything together as it were. If it’s just me and I have a shovel I may not go for a full size hole that swallows knight and horse, I don’t have to dig a full size hole to accomplish my end goal. If it’s me and my compatriots Mr. Knight is going to come to a grizzly end in the bottom of a six foot hole.
I fight, I fight a lot, I like getting hit, I like hitting people. I stick fight and do some HEMA. If I got hit in the face with chain it would at least stun me for a moment, but if it hit my eye? It would destroy it. Remember this is about a story with aspects of reality. I have also dealt with real world wounds, destroy an eye or nose and person is pretty much done. Not break a nose, destroy it. A chain is not that heavy to me, it does not take a lot of force to swing and it can be used in a lot of ways. Three quarter inch chain might be a bit slow but it would be devastating, half inch, not slow and would still be devastating. I took a blow on a gauntlet once; my advice is to try to avoid doing that. So yes, it would be a good weapon and remember, to even if he catches it, I have the other end too, I have as much control as he does, its not a slap, it’s a crushing blow, it’s going to rip skin and tare flesh. Notice I said open face helm or no hard armor on elbows and knees, i.e. chainmail. Even with a gambeson kneecaps and elbows are going to be crippled . It can even be used to block or parry a sword, and if held in both hands with a foot to 18 inches between could even block an ax. (not my first choice)
Most, not all but most medieval peasants would be smaller, and weaker than a knight. Simply put they did not eat as well as the nobility or have any of the other advantages, but this is a story, its epic, now and then a peasant is going to be a great strapping lad with huge shoulders and hands like hams, and sometimes just ten guys with picks and shovels and knives to sharpen wooden stakes for my tiger pit.
Trust me Matt, if you are motivated enough you can do remarkable things.

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Matthew Amt




Location: Laurel, MD, USA
Joined: 17 Sep 2003

Posts: 1,456

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 11:41 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

David Lewis Smith wrote:
Matt:
I grew up on farm, not farm that had our own backhoe; if you needed a hole you dug it. I am in Afghanistan right now and watch guys dig three foot ditches with shovels and picks. They don’t dig ditches for a mile or more because it’s fun, they do it because water is life. If you had to do something to live, you would do it, it’s a matter of survival.


Oh, I'm not saying they couldn't dig holes back then! Having done a little archeology, and read about places like Newstead Roman fort which was riddled with ginormous deep pits, I know our ancestors were rarely happy without a shovel in hand. (If you want a really NICE hole, get the Welsh to dig it! Straight sides, flat bottoms, very well crafted.)


Quote:
On that note, a three foot wide two foot deep hole with spikes in it would kill or maim the horse and send its rider to the ground violently. It’s not that hard to camouflage either, camouflage is not just the hole it is sculpting the area around as well, blending everything together as it were.


Well, initially I was assuming the hole was in a road, because that's where people walk and ride. And I will maintain that I do *not* think it is at all simple to make a covered hole in a road nearly invisible, even an unpaved medieval road. You have a lot of dirt to get rid of, for one thing, and if you just spread it around it's going to look like fresh dirt spread around. If the victim lives around here, he probably knows every pothole and rut. Will you have enough time to dig the hole? You're depending on the schedule of one guy, who might go out riding on a whim. Plus you're going to hold up traffic until your attack is done and the hole is filled in again--won't the merchants complain?

If you're planning your tiger trap for a field or other off-road area, camouflaging is much easier, but you have to figure out how to put it in exactly the right place, or he'll simply ride past it unknowing. That seems dicey to me. And the whole trap may be out the window if he has a friend or two with him, or just servants or a squire. (Though plugging the squire's horse may be just the ticket to lure him in!)

Caltrops are a great idea! Those were certainly known and used. You can even string a number of them along a cord, so that you can retrieve them later and they won't be a lingering danger.

Quote:
I fight, I fight a lot, I like getting hit, I like hitting people.


So does the knight, eh?

Quote:
If I got hit in the face with chain it would at least stun me for a moment, but if it hit my eye? It would destroy it. Remember this is about a story with aspects of reality. I have also dealt with real world wounds, destroy an eye or nose and person is pretty much done. Not break a nose, destroy it.


And yet there are accounts of actual warriors fighting on with wounds like that or even worse. In one medieval battle a knight took a crossbow bolt through his nose from side to side! He found it very annoying since it kept getting bumped as he fought, and that hurt. There was a Byzantine-era battle in which a soldier had to fight with an arrow in his face (it was actually poking out the skin at the back of his neck, so the surgeon was able to pull it out that way--nothing vital was touched!). Another officer was riding through the fight with a javelin sticking out of his skull, waving like a flag pole--didn't slow him down until they pulled it out later, and he died. I think you can find accounts of men fighting with eyeballs hanging down their cheeks, etc. How can you be sure that any blow from a chain will be full-force and have its full effect? No other weapon works that way.

Quote:
Trust me Matt, if you are motivated enough you can do remarkable things.


Agreed! I just can't help thinking that one of the most motivated guys around is going to be that knight. Catch him alone, by surprise, with a lot of friends to back you up, and I think you've got him no matter what kinds of weapons you have. Mess up the attack in any number of ways, though, and don't come looking to me for help, ha!

Matthew


Last edited by Matthew Amt on Sun 20 Nov, 2011 7:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 12:24 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I think you quoted a few exceptions in toughness
and I was a bit ambiguous about where to dig a tiger pit. not on the road, off the beaten path, lure him in like

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Colt Reeves





Joined: 09 Mar 2009

Posts: 466

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 7:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

David Lewis Smith wrote:

As for a knight on foot being slow, no, an unarmored ‘knight killer’ of any kind does not have a significant advantage in speed in close and personal. Even running away he might find himself sliced down from behind.


I tried to find it on Youtube and failed, but there was a part of National Geographic's "Medieval Fight Book" that well showed this. There were a couple of ARMA guys involved, no less than John Clements and his second in command Aaron Pynenberg. (See here: http://www.historicalfencing.com/Talhoffers-Fight-Book-Blog.html)

In any event, there was a sequence that showed Aaron running full tilt for a short distance (the above says about 50 meters), and if I remember correctly he looked equal to or even faster in full armour than me with usual clothing. So while I wouldn't expect him to keep up with me in the long haul, I would fear his wrath at close range.

"Tears are for the craven, prayers are for the clown.
Halters for the silly neck that cannot keep a crown.
As my loss is grievous, so my hope is small.
For Iron, Cold Iron, must be master of men all..."
-Cold Iron, Rudyard Kipling
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 10:56 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Colt Reeves wrote:
In any event, there was a sequence that showed Aaron running full tilt for a short distance (the above says about 50 meters), and if I remember correctly he looked equal to or even faster in full armour than me with usual clothing. So while I wouldn't expect him to keep up with me in the long haul, I would fear his wrath at close range.

Perfect example of why it is ridiculous to do "arrow vs armour" tests at these ranges. How many arrows do you think an archer can shoot at the target before he closes the distance?
View user's profile Send private message
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Sat 19 Nov, 2011 11:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Dan Howard wrote:
Colt Reeves wrote:
In any event, there was a sequence that showed Aaron running full tilt for a short distance (the above says about 50 meters), and if I remember correctly he looked equal to or even faster in full armour than me with usual clothing. So while I wouldn't expect him to keep up with me in the long haul, I would fear his wrath at close range.

Perfect example of why it is ridiculous to do "arrow vs armour" tests at these ranges. How many arrows do you think an archer can shoot at the target before he closes the distance?


I would guess one arrow if it was already ready on the bow string and a second arrow might get almost ready to loose as the Knight ran him through. Wink

That is unless the archer did the sensible thing and dropped his bow and tried to draw/bring up his backup weapon(s) of longsword or one hander + buckler or a long dagger. Wink Laughing Out Loud

Some sort of obstacle or barrier slowing down the Knight might make loosing a few more arrows " survivable ", or being in a small mixed group of Billmen/archers against a smaller number of Knights could permit the archers to keep on shooting at point blank range.

Natually this would be a fight of more than one archer against one Knight. Wink For a minimal number at least one Knight against one Billman + one archer.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
David Lewis Smith




Location: NC
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Likes: 4 pages

Posts: 506

PostPosted: Sun 20 Nov, 2011 12:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I did a 300 or so yard sprint down a Bagdad street in IBA (Body armor), water, weapon, gear and ammo, about 50 to 60 pounds. I don’t know how fast I was running, everything goes in to ‘combat time’ in your brain. I hate to say ‘unless you have been there you just don’t know’. Its sort of like being in an accident or such, it is sort of slow motion but really it’s your brain thinking faster. Time is weird, but I covered the distance and was able to engage in; 1 a physical altercation (nice way of saying I kicked a guy in the chest to put him down, call for a medic, and start rendering first aid on two other guys. Back then I wore my ammo on leg rigs off my belt, so its sort of like having leg armor on. The whole crappy part of it was, they were drunk and blew through the barrier we put up and meant no harm. No one died by the way. I just use that as an illustration of what a person can do. I am not trying to brag or toot my own horn, just using a personal experience to relate to what someone can do. The driver by the way spoke fairly good English and when I realized he was drunk I chewed him out and called him everything but the son of a kind and benevolent Superior Being and told him his friend was shot up because they were drinking and driving, every body lived. (don’t drink and drive it ends badly every time)
There was no real thought through the whole thing, just observations and actions based on training. Any how, a knight put in ‘combat mode’ would move and react the same way. So that is why I sort of defaulted to ‘what would an insurgent do a thousand years ago’
I don’t know how many arrows you could shot at close combat range, if I had a bow, at that range and no armor I am going to try to get away. Nothing fancy just get away. More importantly as an insurgent bowman I am going to plan carefully so I don’t engage an armored opponent at close range. Longbow archers shoot from behind shieldwalls at 100 or so yards for a reason. Heh, I have a really nice Hungarian bow, but I never shot it. If I do engage at close range it is going to be where I have the advantage, like where a road said armored guy is riding and has to go up a steep bank that horse cant/will not go up, and climbing in armor is nearly imposable, or across a wide deep trench, ditch, canal, stream, something with steep banks and soft sides and more importantly, none of his friends have bows either.
Back when I was a combat engineer we use to ‘sculpt the battle field’ by creating obstacles, and obstacle belts, we had different ways of laying them in for different effects. There were Turn obstacles to move an opposing force in a direction you wanted or to ground you wanted them in, Fix obstacles that temporary fixed an opposing force in place while they expended breaching assets and our forces engaged with heavy weapons from dug in positions and Block obstacles which did just that, blocked a path. Block took the longest to put in, and on the other side expended the maximum amount of resources, equipment and men to breach. Mostly I am talking about minefields, but there are wire obstacles, both barbed wire and concertina wire (think meter wide slinky made of barbed wire) you could do the same with vines, rope and twine. One obstical is called tangle foot that is just a ankle high grid of wire to ‘tangle you up’ see here http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/librar...907_10.htm do not skip the use of ‘explosive’ obstacles or land mines, the concept of use if not the actual mines themselves apply, by the way in 1272 the Chinese used the first explosive land mines, and some were Very complex with time delays and all sorts of nasty effects. But look at the use of obstacles rather than what they are made of. There are lots of wire, trench, fence obstacles. Pay particular attention to the section on improvised obstacles. Phony obstacles work too “They left a wagon in the road last year, when we approached they fired arrows from uphill, turn back, we will be pincushioned” you could look here http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/librar...ch3.htm#s3 on ambushes a bit more than halfway down the page and how to do basic combat patrolling as well.
It is pretty dry reading by the way, army tec manuals.

David L Smith
MSG (RET)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Colt Reeves





Joined: 09 Mar 2009

Posts: 466

PostPosted: Sun 20 Nov, 2011 12:17 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hey, if you're lucky you only need one arrow. If you're unlucky... Well then the knight might want to recite some Vogon poetry before offing you. Wink

To be fair, I am not the fastest runner in the world, nor do I accelerate very quickly. Someone who runs a lot or is closer to Aaron's physical abilities might be able to get away if a fight broke out and the odds looked bad. I play football (not hand-egg, but football) and many a player can easily juke and outrun me. Some of them could probably leave Aaron in the dust.

Of course, using Aaron as an example is not necessarily a good one. Knights would vary in physical ability, so I would expect some to be worse than him and some to be better.

Regardless, I wouldn't bet on being able to outrun a knight over a short distance. For that matter, a knight with good stamina and blessed with cool weather might be able to keep up a slow but steady pace over the long haul too.

It would also depend on what the knight has been up to lately. If he has been fighting for much of the day and is exhausted, or has just ran half a mile to get to you, he'll be slower. On the other hand, if you have been fighting or working all day in the field and you're the one that's dead tired...

/Random musing

"Tears are for the craven, prayers are for the clown.
Halters for the silly neck that cannot keep a crown.
As my loss is grievous, so my hope is small.
For Iron, Cold Iron, must be master of men all..."
-Cold Iron, Rudyard Kipling
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Another author's question
Page 2 of 3 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum