Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > XVI.-XVII century armour Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
David Gaál




Location: Hungary
Joined: 26 Mar 2011

Posts: 104

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 12:37 am    Post subject: XVI.-XVII century armour         Reply with quote

Hello,
Do you have any infos about the thickness of armour (breastplate, gorget, helmet...), and shields in the XVI.-XVIIth century? Sometimes they look really thin and I doubt they could stand against a stronger blow or a gunshot. And what wieght did the armours have assembled and each part?
Thanks,
David
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bartek Strojek




Location: Poland
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Likes: 23 pages

Posts: 496

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 1:34 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

This is very broad topic, hard to give general answers.

But usually, pieces of armor from the break of XVI and XVII centuries were actually some of thickest ever used.

Hussar breastplates were generally about 1.8 to 9 mm thick, while obviously 9mm was thickness around the central ridge and 1 mm around places less likely to be hit square.
View user's profile Send private message
Adam Bodorics
Industry Professional




Joined: 15 Apr 2005

Posts: 132

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 4:05 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

http://www.allenantiques.com/Armour-Collection.html
Very good quality photos and quite some measurements, one of the most useful sources IMO. I don't know if Mr. Allen posts here, he sure does over at armourarchive.org, and is extremely helpful.
View user's profile Send private message
Jens Boerner




Location: Erlangen, Germany
Joined: 10 Jan 2008

Posts: 62

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 5:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I can recommand this book: http://books.google.com/books?id=GpVbnsqAzxIC...&hl=de which is available in excerps at google. There is a graphical analysis of the thickness of armour though the centuries, since absolute data can easily be misguiding.
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number
David Gaál




Location: Hungary
Joined: 26 Mar 2011

Posts: 104

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 10:32 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thank you guys you helped a lot Big Grin Big Grin Big Grin
I really like this book it's fantastic.
Many thaks,
David
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Tue 12 Jul, 2011 4:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

David,

Sadly you are not likely to find much on thickness for armour until the mid to late 16th century. It really needs to to be done for medieval armour. I had hoped to do such a project but seems to be years off in the distance now.

There was a study done on some 17th century breastplates but I cannot find it. The RA put it out.

RPM
View user's profile Send private message
David Gaál




Location: Hungary
Joined: 26 Mar 2011

Posts: 104

PostPosted: Wed 13 Jul, 2011 1:09 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Do you have this book(The knight and the blast furnace: a history of the metallurgy of armour in the Middle Ages & the early modern period) in some format on computer or a place from where I could download or buy it? Because the google book does not contain the whole book a few hundred pages are remaining Sad and I haven't found any store where it is currently in stock. And one more question, what about chain maille in that period? In every picture I have seen they are riveted but their inner diameter seems to be sometimes really small but sometimes really big. What was more common, bigger or smaller?

David
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Randall Moffett




Location: Northern Utah
Joined: 07 Jun 2006
Reading list: 5 books

Posts: 2,121

PostPosted: Wed 13 Jul, 2011 3:01 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yeah the KatBF includes only a small number of thicknesses. When I spoke to Dr. Williams last he agreed that some large study should be done on it but that to date he had not done so. The Avant harness I think has some thicknesses given and in his end section on armour penetration.

RPM
View user's profile Send private message
David Gaál




Location: Hungary
Joined: 26 Mar 2011

Posts: 104

PostPosted: Tue 19 Jul, 2011 9:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hello
Do you know how to increase the carbon content of iron? I remember only that one way is to let it rust.
Thanks
David
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Adam Bodorics
Industry Professional




Joined: 15 Apr 2005

Posts: 132

PostPosted: Tue 19 Jul, 2011 10:11 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Letting it rust will only increase it's rustiness, otherwise I'd have a ton of medium carbon armour instead of having russeted pieces. You'd need to carburize (sp?) it, which means heating it to around 930-950°C along with something that releases carbon as it burns (decompose would be a better term, I guess). This is "somewhat" more complicated and pricey compared to buying medium carbon steel plate. (especially as Metalloglobus usually has medium carbon steel sheets in usable thickness in stock)

edited to comply with forum rules.


Last edited by Adam Bodorics on Tue 19 Jul, 2011 6:49 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message
Jojo Zerach





Joined: 26 Dec 2009

Posts: 288

PostPosted: Tue 19 Jul, 2011 10:23 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

It varied a lot.
I read an article on the famous A21 gothic armour (XV century, I know) and they listed average measurments for most of the pieces.
They were:

Upper breastplate: 1.6 mm (1.2 - 2.2)
Lower breastplate: 1.2 mm
Backplate: 1.5 mm (1.1 - 2.3)
Arms: upper vambraces; left, 1.4 mm
lower vambraces; left, 1.5 mm
Legs: main cuisse plates; left 1.2 mm, right 1.3 mm
front of greaves; left 1.1 mm, right 1.2 mm
rear of greaves; left 1.2 mm, right 1.3 mm.
Sallet: skull 2 mm (1.9 - 2.1)
visor 2.5 mm (2.1 - 2.8)
brow at front of skull 4.4 mm (4.1 - 4.6)

This gives a range of roughly 18 gauge on the greaves to 8 gauge on the front of the helmet.
On the other hand, I have a piece of 16th or 17th century munitions armour which is much thinner, it seems about 20 gauge tops.
(Remember all these thicknesses are after forming, grinding, and centuries of rust/polish. If you start making a pair of greaves out of 18 gauge steel, they will end up thinner than that.)
View user's profile Send private message
David Gaál




Location: Hungary
Joined: 26 Mar 2011

Posts: 104

PostPosted: Tue 19 Jul, 2011 11:13 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Many thanks.

I thought but I'm so crazy that I would like to make one on the old way. I have read that in the stores I can only buy iron with less than 0,6% carbon content, and I want to make my own steel. What kind of things do exist which can make the carbon content higher?
David


Last edited by David Gaál on Wed 20 Jul, 2011 1:21 am; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Tue 19 Jul, 2011 3:31 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Per our rules, please post only in English. Thank you.
Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > XVI.-XVII century armour
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum