The curved base plate of the pommel is 2-2.5cm thick in the centre, but the upper section is quite thin, probably only 12mm thick at most.
Just rechecking my photos, the pommel is mostly thin, but the central detail lobe is up to 2cm thick, like a tiny barrel shape.
The older version of the M.D.W. Cawood sword has a broader blade than the newer version but has no Lombardic inscription on it.
Many modern-day reproductions of this sword do not have this inscription engraved on the blade.
Many modern-day reproductions of this sword do not have this inscription engraved on the blade.
Page 2 of 2
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum