Author |
Message |
Richard Jao
|
Posted: Tue 10 Aug, 2010 10:39 pm Post subject: Ned Kelly's sawn off carbine |
|
|
Hi everyone. I've been looking at this one site that details the weapons of Ned Kelly. One of the weapons that's shown promenently is this ancient sawn off carbine that was his trademark weapon until Euroa. Trouble is I can't tell whether this was 100% handmade or if it's a modified version of a previous type of gun.
Is this muzzle loading, or was it repeating? This gun is a complete mystery to me. If anyone can help, please let me know.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Martin Murd
Location: Pärnu, Estonia Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed 11 Aug, 2010 12:10 am Post subject: Re: Ned Kelly's sawn off carbine |
|
|
Richard Jao wrote: | Is this muzzle loading, or was it repeating? This gun is a complete mystery to me. If anyone can help, please let me know.
Thanks! |
It is claimed to be .557 Snider-Enfield.
Here's a wikipedia link to the rifle as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snider-Enfield
Edit: It is a breech-loading conversion from muzzle-loading, to answer a question straight away
Merlon
|
|
|
|
David Teague
Location: Anchorage, Alaska Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 409
|
Posted: Wed 11 Aug, 2010 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Except the cut down carbine doesn't have the Snider conversion in Richard 's linked photo. That has a hammer and nipple of a percussion firearm.
You might be mixing up two of Ned Kelly's firearms.
The one Richard has linked looks like a cut down muzzleloading Enfield musket. Maybe the 1853. (The Brits converted the 1853's to a breach loading design via the Snider conversion)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_1853_Enfield
Cheers,
DT
This you shall know, that all things have length and measure.
Free Scholar/ Instructor Selohaar Fechtschule
The Historic Recrudescence Guild
"Yea though I walk through the valley of death, I will fear no evil: for Thou's sword art is with me; Thy poleaxe and Thy quarterstaff they comfort me."
|
|
|
|
Martin Murd
Location: Pärnu, Estonia Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
Posted: Wed 11 Aug, 2010 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, David, you seem to be right. Thank you for pointing that out.
Merlon
|
|
|
|
|