Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Migration Period Sword Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next 
Author Message
Stephen Curtin




Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Likes: 110 pages
Reading list: 18 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,220

PostPosted: Wed 20 Oct, 2010 1:10 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hi Henrik funny you should mention Parthian swords, as I was just looking into them myself, I was actually looking for info on Sassanid swords as they definately share some characteristics with Hunnic sword. Then I found an image of one of these Parthian swords (which Sassanid sword developed from) and IMHO it looked very similar to the plainer examples of Hunnic swords.
Éirinn go Brách
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stephen Curtin




Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Likes: 110 pages
Reading list: 18 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,220

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 1:26 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I was doing some more looking around and I noticed that the two handed sword posted above by Till J. Lodemann seems to be very similar to some Han dynasty swords which can be seen on Thomas Chen's website (probably the best resource for chinese sword info online) here

http://thomaschen.freewebspace.com/photo.html

So there's another Chinese / Hun connection for you Paul. I think that the Huns probably started with swords very similar to those of the Han dynasty and as time went on, and as they moved westward, they adopted elements of Sassanid style swords (which they in turn also influenced), such as P shaped fittings, and possibly adornments of precious metals and stones.


Earlier on in the thread someone pointed out that there seems to be no evidence of pattern welding in these blades, I think that a comment was also made about how it was funny that a practical people such as the Huns would have beautifully decorated hilts attached to poor quality blades (btw to whoever made the above comments, forgive me if I'm miss remembering but I didn't have time to look through the whole thread)

As I'm not aware of any metalurgical study on these sword, all we can do is speculate. So, I think that there is a good chance that early Hunnic swords derived from Han dynasty swords, and if that is the case, then it is possible that the Huns also derived their smithing skills from the Han.

Sword of the Han dynasty were made using very sophisticated techniques, the chinese were using various laminations of iron and steel, along with forge folding, and differential heat treating, all of there techniques would later be transmitted to Japan, where they were made famous by way of the katana.

There was much trade between the Middle East and China during this period, as seen by the adoption of P shaped fittings on Chinese dao, so I dont think it is too far a stretch to imaging Chinese bladesmithing techniques being brought to Europe by Hunnic peoples.

Wootz steel is another possibility, as it was much traded in Asia at this time.

Éirinn go Brách
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Till J. Lodemann





Joined: 15 Jan 2007

Posts: 97

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 9:07 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hi Stephen!
SOme nice ideas. But you shouldn't speculate so far. Have you evidence that wootz was used in the steppeworld at this period of time? I mean ok, wikipedia states that it was "widely exported" but what does this mean anyway?

Also, chinese and japanese bladesmithing techniques, as stated by you, are not as advanced or special as you might think. The same techniques exist since at least the 8th century BC in middle europe I know some early ironage Mindelheim swords from Rubenheim-Wolfersheim (Germany) that have been examined and showed the applimentation of these same techinques.

Coinincedentally I read a text about pattern welded weapons in the danish bog finds again just lately
(by Robert Thomsen, Metallografiske undersøkelser af sværd og spydspidser fra mosefundene i Illerup og Nydam, in: Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1992)
Three types of blades have been identified in the bog sacrifices (always a splendid source for roman swords of the 3rd to 5th centuries). The first type doesn't show pattern welded structures and has a layered structure visible on the intersection, similar to early celtic or eastern e.g. chinese or japanese) blades.
Type 2 is thoroughly patternwelded with different kinds of patterns from stripes to some quite complicated alternations of twisted and straight.; and edges of refined steel welded on
Type 3 has only thin layers of pattern welded material welded to a refined mild steel core and hardened edges. The patterns are even more elaborate here, for example "tree pattern" - a lot of tiny trees, bit like the modern rose pattern.
I will load it up later:lol:

All of these blades are contemporal 3rd century AD
This and the metallographical examinations show that pattern welding was neither the only way to produce a quality blade nor was it superior to non patternwelded swords.

Concerning the design of long hunnish swords and Han jian swords, both certainly share some similarities in design and maybe have a common "ancestor" but they are not the same; the fittings are very different from each other.
It is possible that the hunnish swords derrive from chinese archetypes but they must have been used by the huns since the downfall of the Xiongnu.
Otherwise, the huns would also have known and used the "dao", a weapon much more usefull for a horseman.
View user's profile Send private message
Luka Borscak




Location: Croatia
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Likes: 7 pages

Posts: 2,307

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 12:46 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Hi Stephen!

Type 3 has only thin layers of pattern welded material welded to a refined mild steel core and hardened edges. The patterns are even more elaborate here, for example "tree pattern" - a lot of tiny trees, bit like the modern rose pattern.
I will load it up later:lol:


Do you maybe have a picture of this pattern?
View user's profile Send private message
Till J. Lodemann





Joined: 15 Jan 2007

Posts: 97

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 1:15 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Here is an example of what I mean. A blade from Illerup.


 Attachment: 201.87 KB
baumdamast3.jpg
polished and etched orginal 3rd century blade

 Attachment: 186.98 KB
baumdamast4.jpg
scetch of the same blade
View user's profile Send private message
Paul Hansen




Location: The Netherlands
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Likes: 5 pages

Posts: 845

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 1:28 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Stephen Curtin wrote:
Sword of the Han dynasty were made using very sophisticated techniques, the chinese were using various laminations of iron and steel, along with forge folding, and differential heat treating, all of there techniques would later be transmitted to Japan, where they were made famous by way of the katana.


Also a san-mai / laminated type of construction should show up on the surface of the blade. At least in some examples.
But all Hunnish swords I've seen seemed to be homogeneous...

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
(by Robert Thomsen, Metallografiske undersøkelser af sværd og spydspidser fra mosefundene i Illerup og Nydam, in: Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie 1992)
Three types of blades have been identified in the bog sacrifices (always a splendid source for roman swords of the 3rd to 5th centuries).

Sounds really interesting! If you do have the opportunity to scan it, please do! Happy

The pattern welding from Illerup is spectacular by the way!

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Concerning the design of long hunnish swords and Han jian swords, both certainly share some similarities in design and maybe have a common "ancestor" but they are not the same; the fittings are very different from each other.
It is possible that the hunnish swords derrive from chinese archetypes but they must have been used by the huns since the downfall of the Xiongnu.


One interesting difference is the cross-section.

It seems that Han dynasty jians have a diamond or occasionally hexagonal/octagonal cross-section (see attachment), whereas the Hunnish swords seem to have had a lenticular cross-section, occasionally with a fuller. Of course, it could be possible that a diamond cross-section corrodes into a lenticular one... But to me, this difference seems more interesting and important than just the shape of fittings, which are easy to change and do not really alter the character of the weapon.

And the absence of a dao type weapon among the Huns is also noteworthy.



 Attachment: 113.07 KB
[ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message
Luka Borscak




Location: Croatia
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Likes: 7 pages

Posts: 2,307

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 1:47 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Here is an example of what I mean. A blade from Illerup.


Very interesting, thanks!
View user's profile Send private message
Scott Hrouda




Location: Minnesota, USA
Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Likes: 15 pages
Reading list: 87 books

Posts: 643

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 3:12 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Here is an example of what I mean. A blade from Illerup.


I never seen a "Tree Pattern" before. That is most stunning!

...and that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana shaped. - Sir Bedevere
View user's profile Send private message
Timo Nieminen




Location: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 08 May 2009
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 1,504

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 4:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Hi Stephen!
SOme nice ideas. But you shouldn't speculate so far. Have you evidence that wootz was used in the steppeworld at this period of time? I mean ok, wikipedia states that it was "widely exported" but what does this mean anyway?


Depending on exactly what one means by "wootz", it might not be a matter of export, since the Central Asian crucible steel industry is old, perhaps older than the Indian industry. According to Wikipedia, there is 8th century physical evidence. At any rate, there's somewhat later evidence of large scale production (e.g., in Merv, 9th c.), and possible literary evidence (e.g., see discussion in the translation/commentary of/on al-Kindi.

A. Feuerbach, IAMS Journal 25, 27-43 (2005) has some interesting swords, e.g., KIS#2, 35r-4th century, crucible steel.

"In addition to being efficient, all pole arms were quite nice to look at." - Cherney Berg, A hideous history of weapons, Collier 1963.


Last edited by Timo Nieminen on Fri 22 Oct, 2010 7:38 pm; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Stephen Curtin




Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Likes: 110 pages
Reading list: 18 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,220

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 4:41 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Hi Stephen!
SOme nice ideas. But you shouldn't speculate so far. Have you evidence that wootz was used in the steppeworld at this period of time? I mean ok, wikipedia states that it was "widely exported" but what does this mean anyway?


Well I admit that wootz may be a little unlikely but I've heard that wootz was being exported to China during this period, though I don't think that it was widely used.

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Also, chinese and japanese bladesmithing techniques, as stated by you, are not as advanced or special as you might think. The same techniques exist since at least the 8th century BC in middle europe I know some early ironage Mindelheim swords from Rubenheim-Wolfersheim (Germany) that have been examined and showed the applimentation of these same techinques.


I was not trying to imply that East Asian sword smithing techniques were in any way superior to European techniques. I'm just saying that although no metalurgic test have been conducted, there is no reason to believe that Hunnic swords were not also of good quality.

Éirinn go Brách
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kirk Lee Spencer




Location: Texas
Joined: 24 Oct 2003

Spotlight topics: 6
Posts: 820

PostPosted: Thu 21 Oct, 2010 5:12 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Great discussion...

This link may be of interest considering the experimentation in pattern welding occuring in the late Roman Iron Age.

http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...ht=pattern

take care

ks

Two swords
Lit in Eden’s flame
One of iron and one of ink
To place within a bloody hand
One of God or one of man
Our souls to one of
Two eternities
View user's profile Send private message
Till J. Lodemann





Joined: 15 Jan 2007

Posts: 97

PostPosted: Fri 22 Oct, 2010 10:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thank you very much Kirk. A very interesting topic!
I almost forgot this pattern:



It's very uncommon, too.
View user's profile Send private message
Henrik Zoltan Toth




Location: Hungary
Joined: 18 Feb 2007

Posts: 200

PostPosted: Sat 23 Oct, 2010 8:22 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Good afternoon!

Here are the promissed pics. You probably already know the avar ringsword, one piece was in Kubrat's grave.

Regards:

Zoltán



 Attachment: 197.92 KB
img225.jpg
Weapons from the Caucasus

 Attachment: 197.89 KB
img226.jpg


 Attachment: 233.67 KB
img228.jpg
4th Century, Todaidjiyama (Nara prefect), ringswords

 Attachment: 171.8 KB
Parthian warrior on the right; Hatra, 1-3 Th Cent. ad. [ Download ]

 Attachment: 231.54 KB
Huang-ti's soldier from the terrakotta army [ Download ]

 Attachment: 234.14 KB
Avar sword from Visegrád, 6-7 th Cent.; patern welded blade; [ Download ]

 Attachment: 231.79 KB
The Visegrád ringsword [ Download ]

 Attachment: 212.44 KB
Avar weapons in the Hungarian National Museum [ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message
Henrik Zoltan Toth




Location: Hungary
Joined: 18 Feb 2007

Posts: 200

PostPosted: Sat 23 Oct, 2010 8:44 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Other chinese swords:

http://chineseswords2.freewebspace.com

Zoltán
View user's profile Send private message
Stephen Curtin




Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Likes: 110 pages
Reading list: 18 books

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,220

PostPosted: Sat 30 Oct, 2010 3:36 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I have just found some pics of two swords that I think everyone might find interesting.

The first appears to be a Hunnic sword with silver plated hilt and garnet decorated lower guard.

http://m.flickr.com/photos/antiquitiesproject/4875389055/

The second sword has fittings decorated with gold and garnet, I'm not sure what culture it belongs to, but I remember somebody telling me that it gothic.

http://m.flickr.com/photos/antiquitiesproject/4670359307/

Also, the sword at this top of this thread, and the next one down, were on the same flickr account as these two swords. The info that goes with these swords says that they are all from 5th / 6th century Georgia (ancient Colchis), except for the second sword I posted which is from Kerch. So, providing that this info is correct, Its seems safe to say that the sword in question from the OP is indeed Hunnic.

P.S. if someone could post these pics on this thread I would be very gratefull. I would do it myself but I'm using the internet on my phone so I cant.

Éirinn go Brách
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Sat 30 Oct, 2010 11:21 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Henrik Zoltan Toth wrote:
Good afternoon!

Here are the promissed pics. You probably already know the avar ringsword, one piece was in Kubrat's grave.

Regards:

Zoltán


"Spits" or metal rods similar to the ones at the bottom photo brochure you posted were found at some Roman sites dated to early AD. (Finds at a temple are speculated to have been a possible offering to the local deity.) Carbon in some of these spits is consistent with 1.5% to 2% carbon content wootz, and discussion of the qualities and source of trade metals from appropriate regions was discussed in the Natural History text. It seems credible that crucible steels (maybe wootz, maybe not, but similar in strength and working requirements) existed and were traded in fairly early AD era.

Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message
Till J. Lodemann





Joined: 15 Jan 2007

Posts: 97

PostPosted: Sun 31 Oct, 2010 4:29 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Here are the two swords Stephen found at flickr:





Intersting detail on the second sword is an irregularity on the blade parallel to the upper edge, which could indicate a (roman style) bladestamp.



Jared, that sounds very interesting, can you tell more about it? Also I don't really understand to which one of Hendriks fotos you refer in your post. Do you mean the one labeled with "4th Century, Todaidjiyama (Nara prefect), ringswords"? I think these are ringswords and not spits (well, easy one as the name says it, but no other spit like objects anywere...
Confused )
And can you tell more about the source you mentioned? And where have these spits been found?
View user's profile Send private message
Jared Smith




Location: Tennessee
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 3
Posts: 1,532

PostPosted: Sun 31 Oct, 2010 9:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Till J. Lodemann wrote:


Jared, that sounds very interesting, can you tell more about it? Also I don't really understand to which one of Hendriks fotos you refer in your post. Do you mean the one labeled with "4th Century, Todaidjiyama (Nara prefect), ringswords"? I think these are ringswords and not spits (well, easy one as the name says it, but no other spit like objects anywere...
Confused )
And can you tell more about the source you mentioned? And where have these spits been found?


I mistook the Todaidjiyama "rings words" for spits, or trade iron bars. "Iron and Steel Currency Bars in Ancient Greece", by Maria Kostoglou, has some information on the subject. I would have to dig a bit if you need more. That one did turn up in internet searches just a few months ago.

Absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence!
View user's profile Send private message
Paul Hansen




Location: The Netherlands
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Likes: 5 pages

Posts: 845

PostPosted: Wed 03 Nov, 2010 12:17 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Timo Nieminen wrote:
Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Hi Stephen!
SOme nice ideas. But you shouldn't speculate so far. Have you evidence that wootz was used in the steppeworld at this period of time? I mean ok, wikipedia states that it was "widely exported" but what does this mean anyway?


Depending on exactly what one means by "wootz", it might not be a matter of export, since the Central Asian crucible steel industry is old, perhaps older than the Indian industry. According to Wikipedia, there is 8th century physical evidence. At any rate, there's somewhat later evidence of large scale production (e.g., in Merv, 9th c.), and possible literary evidence (e.g., see discussion in the translation/commentary of/on al-Kindi.

A. Feuerbach, IAMS Journal 25, 27-43 (2005) has some interesting swords, e.g., KIS#2, 35r-4th century, crucible steel.


That is a really interesting publication! There are a few swords in there that might be Hunnish. There's even an Alan short sword!

The thing that strikes me is the extremely low hardness of many of these blades, including the crucible steel ones. KIS #2 has 220 VPH, which roughly translates to 20 HRC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardness_comparison
(keep in mind that this translation is not 100% accurate due to different testing method)

Roughly similar (or higher) hardnesses are found in carburised iron blades. Some iron (ferrite) swords are so low that they fall off the HRC scale... The hardest sword in the range (KIS #8) is made from carburised iron and reaches a respectable 48 HRC, but it cracked during hardness testing...

The wootz Zschokke swords referenced to in Verhoeven's article:
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/9809/verhoeven-9809.html
give higher hardness values: 32, 23 and 37 HRC.

All food for thought...

Anyway, it seems that the crucible steel used in these blades is not superior to the other types of blade making. Not in terms of hardness anyway.
View user's profile Send private message
Paul Hansen




Location: The Netherlands
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Likes: 5 pages

Posts: 845

PostPosted: Wed 03 Nov, 2010 1:23 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Henrik Zoltan Toth wrote:
Here are the promissed pics.
Ohh, that's nice!!!

Especially the first one is really interesting. It seems like a sister to the Pouan sax:


I would be really interested in hearing more about this sax!

Stephen Curtin wrote:
I have just found some pics of two swords that I think everyone might find interesting.


Thanks for the pictures! There are some more interesting swords at the same page in Flickr. Like I said in the Visigoth thread, I'm not sure that the way they layed the parts out is correct. For instance, the "pommel" seems like a sword hanger to me...

Till J. Lodemann wrote:
Intersting detail on the second sword is an irregularity on the blade parallel to the upper edge, which could indicate a (roman style) bladestamp.
Good eye! And an interesting observation: a Roman blade stamp on a Hunnish sword... This is one of the swords auctioned by Hermann Historica. I remember seeing it in the Hun exhibition in Speyer, but I didn't notice that detail. The blade shape seems typically Hunnish though, rather than Roman.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Migration Period Sword
Page 3 of 4 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum