Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > :!: Knights and what thier swords ment to them. Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 

Wich would win in a battle?
Knight
81%
 81%  [ 30 ]
Samurai
8%
 8%  [ 3 ]
Ninja
10%
 10%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 37

Author Message
Ozsváth Árpád-István




Location: Romania
Joined: 27 Apr 2008

Posts: 131

PostPosted: Thu 13 May, 2010 8:08 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well, this was, I guess.

Ozsváth Árpád-István wrote:

If you don't believe me take a look at K1 or MMA (this is much closer to the "real thing") tournaments, and see that modern "samurais" and "ninjas" are not so bright, european fighters have superior constitution and "firepower".


Japan often complains that they don't have enough heavyweigth fighters. That's a fact. In contact sports size matters.

Japan has excellent natural defenses, they were isolated and "frozen in time". There was no need for major changes and improvements in armament or tactics for centuries.

On the other hand in Europe was a different situation, there were many nations and cultures, therefore weapons and combat tactics had to adapt quickly, they were more versatile and suffered sudden and dramatic changes.

Now for the ninja. I don't consider the ninja a true warrior. He couldn't stand a chance against a samurai in the battlefield. They were silent assassins, masters of stealth, trained to eliminate a specific target, to sneak, create confusion or wait for the right moment for the kill using unorthodox methods, like poisoning their victims.


Well, besides the comparison, the original question was " Knights and what their swords ment to them." Chivalry was closely related to Christianity and therefore the cruciform sword was a strong religious symbol used to butcher "the heathens", "the unbelievers", "the heretics" or anyone else who stood in the way of the Church or the Kingdom, against all basic doctrines on which Christianity relies. "You shall not kill, only if you have orders" Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jeremy V. Krause




Location: Buffalo, NY.
Joined: 20 Oct 2003
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 1,717

PostPosted: Thu 13 May, 2010 9:22 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks for this fascinating and informative thread!!
View user's profile Send private message
Walter S




Location: Czech Republic
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 86

PostPosted: Thu 13 May, 2010 10:02 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Ozsváth Árpád-István wrote:
"You shall not kill, only if you have orders" Happy


It is pretty much agreed upon that the meaning of the phrase is "You shall not murder" - that is, unlawfully kill innocent. It does not prohibit killing in war, The Bible actually praises killing enemies in war - for example David killing Goliath.
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Curl




Location: Northern California, US
Joined: 06 Jan 2008

Posts: 487

PostPosted: Thu 13 May, 2010 3:56 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

http://www.sengokudaimyo.com/katchu/katchu.html

Japanese armour got quite heavy. Personally i prefer European but its hard to not see the usefulness of Japanese armour against European weapons (spear is a spear everywhere, ditto with arrows.)

E Pluribus Unum
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Tom King




Location: florida
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Likes: 2 pages

Posts: 429

PostPosted: Fri 14 May, 2010 8:43 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Michael Curl wrote:
spear is a spear everywhere, ditto with arrows.
Thats terribly incorrect. Japanese spears are definately not armor peircing. Its all down to blade profile. leaf bladed spears were replaced by glorified spikes because it pierces armor better. jap arrows were broadheads and therefore useless on armor.
View user's profile Send private message
Grayson C.




Location: NCF, Sarasota, FL
Joined: 25 Oct 2006

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 223

PostPosted: Fri 14 May, 2010 3:09 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Also, lets not forget that the tanged shafts of japanese spears and arrowheads made them prone to breakage in the stab when compared to european socket design.
View user's profile Send private message
Timo Nieminen




Location: Brisbane, Australia
Joined: 08 May 2009
Likes: 1 page
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 1,504

PostPosted: Fri 14 May, 2010 7:32 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Tom King wrote:
Michael Curl wrote:
spear is a spear everywhere, ditto with arrows.
Thats terribly incorrect. Japanese spears are definately not armor peircing.


Sankaku-yari (triangular [cross-section]) seem to be the most common. A "normal" hira-sankaku-yari (flat triangular) head often has a thickness of about half its width, so quite stout. Sei-sankaku-yari (equilateral triangular) were also common, especially for cavalry. Square section also common enough; Knutsen describes the blunt pyramidal tip common on these as "intended to punch a hole through armour".

Definitely thrusting heads, not cutting heads, even on many (most?) very long-headed spears (omi-no-yari). Not going to go through any plate but the thinnest, but robust enough to survive the experience of hitting heavy armour.

Thick and narrow blades are usually considered indicative of armour-piercing function. Why not typical Japanese spearheads?

Tom King wrote:
Its all down to blade profile. leaf bladed spears were replaced by glorified spikes because it pierces armor better. jap arrows were broadheads and therefore useless on armor.


Except for the arrowheads that weren't broadheads. I've seen square-section with pyramidal point, thick diamond-section with pyramidal point, chisel-headed, and more, that are much like European anti-armour heads.

One difference between Japanese heads and Indo-Persian/Ottoman/European heads is that the Japanese heads often have parallel sides, and then a shorter, less acute, taper to the point, while the non-Japanese heads more often have a more uniform taper to the point. The less acute angle means they'll be less effective at piercing armour, and the parallel sides mean that they'll be more effective if they do pierce it. Once the tip is in, the rest of the head can follow to considerable depth with relatively little resistance. Sometimes, the tip is wider than the rest of the head.

Votive arrowheads (and other decorated arrowheads) are almost always broadheads.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Daniel de Castro Caputo




Location: Brazil
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Posts: 11

PostPosted: Tue 18 May, 2010 7:24 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well...

The symbolic value of a knight´s sword was great, but it never achieved the spiritual totem status that the katana meant to the samurai... However, it was a symbol of his honor, his name, his word, so better not to underestimate this...

As for the confrontation between japanese and europeans...

When the portuguese arrived in japan, there was an incident when a single warship stood up against an entire clan... They were using cannons, of course...

Later on, the the king of Portugal ordered an spiritual conquest of japan (because he couldn´t spare his "armada" that was being used to conquer and control the much more valuable India). In this way, the "companhia dos jesuítas" began to send missionaries to christianize Japan. The priests were guarded by portuguese soldiers, and sometimes there were confrontation between these soldier and samurais. There were duels, and there are registers of these duels both in "torre do tombo", in portugal, and in the Japanese Imperial Museum...

There´s no register of one of these duels being won by a samurai... It seems that the "espadeiros" won mostly by thrusting their swords in the samurais axiles.

Daniel de Castro Caputo
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Bennison N




Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: 06 Feb 2008
Likes: 1 page

Posts: 416

PostPosted: Tue 18 May, 2010 7:53 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Daniel de Castro Caputo wrote:
There were duels, and there are registers of these duels both in "torre do tombo", in portugal, and in the Japanese Imperial Museum...

There´s no register of one of these duels being won by a samurai... It seems that the "espadeiros" won mostly by thrusting their swords in the samurais axiles.


I've heard this often too. I keep telling my Modern-day Samurai mates this, although it seems they never believe me...

Not too drag this off-topic too much, but where might I find the records of these duels? I've always really wanted to know more about them. If possible, could you PM me the whereabouts please?

"Never give a sword to a man who can't dance" - Confucius

अजयखड्गधारी
View user's profile Send private message
Daniel de Castro Caputo




Location: Brazil
Joined: 23 Jan 2008

Posts: 11

PostPosted: Tue 18 May, 2010 9:39 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

couldn´t find any document on the web as a reference regarding portuguese and samurai duel, but you could search in the book of the clan shimazu and the work of Dr. Stephen Turnbull, PHD in japanese religion and the samurai.

Unfortunately, Torre do Tombo files can not be accessed on-line...

Daniel de Castro Caputo
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > :!: Knights and what thier swords ment to them.
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum