Author |
Message |
Sam N.
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject: Exotic European Weaponry. |
|
|
Recently while watching some old Kung-Fu flicks, a realization struck me: Asia seems to have many odd and exotic forms of weaponry, why don't we?
I mean, they have everything from Shuriken, Kusari-gama, Three-sectional staves, all manner of small concealed weaponry and many weapons that quite frankly, I can't remember the names of!
What odd weapons do we have, I am sure we can more then match the Chinese or Japanese in terms of odd pieces of weaponry.
I am asking to post examples of particularly odd and unique European weaponry, especially "hidden" weapons.
I guess we have the Dueling shield and the Rapier, but what else?
Post!
|
|
|
|
Sean Belair
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pistol shield combo, gun axe combo, the man catcher polearm, the sword breaker
|
|
|
|
Kenton Spaulding
|
|
|
|
Sam N.
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good point with the combo weapons, the article was indeed fascinating and the weapons were quite unique. However, do we have any other ones that don't involve gunpowder?
|
|
|
|
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin
|
|
|
|
Michael Clark
Location: Welland, Ontario Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 45
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know it's not all that relevant, but I just had to note it: the three-sectioned staff was more equipment for Wu Shu (a chinese martial art) than a weapon. Though it could have been implemented, it wasn't practical. I apologize if I sound like I'm trying to be a smarty-pants.
I think the main thing to consider is that European warfare was fairly linear, and battles were primarily the concept of armies. That is, many many men, usually in tight formations. The use of the kusari-gama, for instance, would not be of significant function in these situations.
It's also of use to note that technological advance was constant, usually relating with current weapons, and there probably wasn't ever time for someone to come up with a new weapon.. The mode of thought was fairly linear as well: cut with this, bash with that, keep away with this, and above all, don't get hit with any of it in retaliation.
This is just my personal thoughts as to WHY we don't see any fancy "exotic" weapons in comparison to other civilizations. Forgive me if I have no idea what I'm talking about. Personally, I think the double-edged cruciform sword has a level of exoticness to itself.
|
|
|
|
Brian Boll
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These are from the ARMA pdf of the 1459 Talhoffer book. Some look like specialised duelling weapons.
Attachment: 81.65 KB
Attachment: 74.37 KB
Attachment: 66.66 KB
Attachment: 104.91 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 74.91 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 76.14 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 76.53 KB
[ Download ]
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
|
|
|
Lafayette C Curtis
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Damn. I was going to mention those as well, but...
...all right. The biggest question now is how exotic is "exotic?" If we're talking about the lay public's definition of exotic, a halberd is actually exotic enough. An axe-head on a long pole with a thrusting spike on top and a hook on the back isn't something you'd find in just about any culture in the world. If that's not enough, look at the military fork, the militarized agricultural flail (which is not the ball-at-the-end-of-a-chain sort of "flail" at all), or the uniquely-shaped head of the military bill. Then there's the parrying dagger with spring-loaded prongs.
And I'm sure we've just barely scratched the surface with all the examples posted here.
|
|
|
|
Bill Grandy
myArmoury Team
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Michael Clark wrote: | I think the main thing to consider is that European warfare was fairly linear, and battles were primarily the concept of armies. That is, many many men, usually in tight formations. The use of the kusari-gama, for instance, would not be of significant function in these situations.
It's also of use to note that technological advance was constant, usually relating with current weapons, and there probably wasn't ever time for someone to come up with a new weapon.. The mode of thought was fairly linear as well: cut with this, bash with that, keep away with this, and above all, don't get hit with any of it in retaliation.
This is just my personal thoughts as to WHY we don't see any fancy "exotic" weapons in comparison to other civilizations. |
The thing here, though, is that you're kind of comparing apples and oranges. The majority of the "exotic" Asian weapons that we see in "spaghetti eastern" kung fu flicks are not weapons of war. In fact, most of them are not very ancient, either, having existed from the 18th century and later. A number of the really exotic Chinese weapons are from the early 20th century, from what I understand.
So if we look at European weapons from a similar context, I think we can find quite a huge number of exotic ones. Daggers with spring loaded arms to split into three sectioned blades for parrying, shield-gauntlets with blades and hooks that look like something from an H.R. Giger painting, judicial duelling swords with sliding hand guards, pole arms with spring loaded spikes that fire, rapiers with spring loaded arms that appear with the touch of a button to form additional quillons, swords with spring loaded daggers hidden in the hilt, "case" of rapiers where two swords with half hilts fit into one scabbard, forearm shields with blades that spring out like Wolverine's claws, and so much more...
And this doesn't even touch on firearms, which were pretty exotic for most historical eras. I think the reason we don't see so many "exotic" weapons of western culture is because if you did see one in a movie, most people think, "That's just some silly fantasy weapon." Whereas if you devised some sort of silly fantasy weapon and armed Jet Li with it, people would say, "That is the coolest thing ever."
HistoricalHandcrafts.com
-Inspired by History, Crafted by Hand
"For practice is better than artfulness. Your exercise can do well without artfulness, but artfulness is not much good without the exercise.” -anonymous 15th century fencing master, MS 3227a
|
|
|
|
George Hill
Location: Atlanta Ga Joined: 16 May 2005
Posts: 614
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 11:15 pm Post subject: Re: Exotic European Weaponry. |
|
|
Sam N. wrote: | Recently while watching some old Kung-Fu flicks, a realization struck me: Asia seems to have many odd and exotic forms of weaponry, why don't we? |
WE DO! I made something of a study of this not that long ago. You name it, I can find you a European equal.
Quote: |
I mean, they have everything from Shuriken,
|
We have Hurlbats. Bigger, better and harder hitting Shuriken
We have those too... except the base item is a Poleaxe and not a kama.
Fiore mentions them.
He also describes poleaxes loaded with blinding powder.
Quote: |
Three-sectional staves,
|
The two handed flail is a two section staff. Adding a third is just being showy.
To abandon your shield is the basest of crimes. - --Tacitus on Germania
Last edited by George Hill on Thu 21 Jun, 2007 12:17 am; edited 4 times in total
|
|
|
|
Michael Clark
Location: Welland, Ontario Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 45
|
Posted: Wed 20 Jun, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bill Grandy wrote: | . . .shield-gauntlets with blades and hooks that look like something from an H.R. Giger painting |
I'm not sure who that is, but it sounds intriguing
Quote: | . . .judicial duelling swords with sliding hand guards. . . |
And what would THAT be like?
Quote: | . . .forearm shields with blades that spring out like Wolverine's claws. . . |
The 7-year-old boy inside me filled with glee
Quote: | I think the reason we don't see so many "exotic" weapons of western culture is because if you did see one in a movie, most people think, "That's just some silly fantasy weapon." Whereas if you devised some sort of silly fantasy weapon and armed Jet Li with it, people would say, "That is the coolest thing ever." |
And by nature of the beast, they'll also say "Man, would I like to use one of those." Media has been a big part in stifling realistic understanding of weapons and combat, afterall.
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
|
|
|
Bram Verbeek
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Earlier we have Mace-axes, Falcata, Falx, scythed chariots, incendiary pigs (reputedly, they are of course topped by chinese incediary monkeys), siege towers that reached to 10 stories high, hooks and chains to tow whole ships out of the water and probably a whole lot of things I am forgetting now
|
|
|
|
Sam N.
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The link to the throwing cross is broken. Could you post another one though? I am really interested in finding out what this weapon looks like!
Anyway, don't worry, I'm just doing this thread for fun. I am curious what sort of weapons we have that even we would consider odd.
|
|
|
|
Sam N.
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brian Boll wrote: | These are from the ARMA pdf of the 1459 Talhoffer book. Some look like specialised duelling weapons. |
What the heck is that guy wearing ?
I think we would have to say that the medieval scuba-diver takes the prize for strangest thing ever seen in a fechtbuch!
I can almost imagine people using this as proof of aliens ...
|
|
|
|
Merv Cannon
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 6:09 am Post subject: Exotic western weapons |
|
|
Hi Craig...........Do you know if Liberi calls this weapon a "poleaxe-sword" in the translation himself ? I cant see that it is, myself....it looks very much like a two-handed Boar hunting sword to me. Im no expert here, but I just cant make out the äxe" part ! Looks the same as the boar hunting swords that I've seen in both the shape of the speartip point and the cross bar behind it.
Anyone like to add comment on this ?
Thanks !
Merv ....... KOLR
http://www.lionrampant.com.au/
"Then let slip the dogs of war ! "......Woof !
|
|
|
|
Craig Peters
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 6:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The text accompanying this image says something along the lines of "Excuse this sword for the sword and for the pole-axe/ In weapons and without who for me to use with ease."
|
|
|
|
Gary A. Chelette
|
Posted: Thu 21 Jun, 2007 6:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Michael Clark wrote: | I know it's not all that relevant, but I just had to note it: the three-sectioned staff was more equipment for Wu Shu (a chinese martial art) than a weapon. |
I took my first black belt test with this weapon many years ago and I had to know it's history and it's use. It was a weapon and was also used to to dislodge riders from their horses.
The Sanjiegun, was also used for defense against spears and other long weapons.it also has the advantage of being used both as a long-range weapon or a short-range weapon acting as an extension of the users arm.
It's a most difficult weapon to use and can be a very beautiful weapon to watch in the hands of a master.
Are you scared, Connor?
No, Cousin Dugal. I'm not!
Don't talk nonsense, man. I peed my kilt the first time I went into battle.
Oh, aye. Angus pees his kilt all the time!
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|