Posts: 1,606 Location: Chicago, Illinois
Fri 10 Jul, 2009 9:37 am
Question about Viking sword hilt...
I found this picture of a very interesting viking sword hilt. It was listed as from the 11th century. It doesn't really seem to fit into any of Petersen's types.... My question is; what would the pommel look like for this hilt? Does anyone have an example of a similar hilt
with a pommel?
Attachment: 20.87 KB

Posts: 675 Location: Louisville, KY
Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:04 am
Looks like the cross for the Dybak sword (minus the corroded-on scabbard chape). Very pretty!
Posts: 14 Location: Illinois
Fri 10 Jul, 2009 10:40 pm
Just guessing of course, but I think it may have been either a type O or something resembling the one on the Albion Valkyrja.
At least I think it would look cool and appropriate with either of these types. It could have been something else of course, but the proportions of it as well as the artistic style seem to me to indicate a later type.
What really seems interesting about this guard is it's made of bone IIRC. Not too many of those around. The quality of the carving is just masterful, and if you look carefully it seems to have the remains of some silver inlay in some of those lines.
This is one of those bits that really makes me wish we had the whole thing. What a marvelous weapon it must have been.
Does anyone know where this one was found?
Posts: 1,606 Location: Chicago, Illinois
Sat 11 Jul, 2009 12:23 am
Posts: 142 Location: WI
Sat 11 Jul, 2009 5:13 am
I wonder what type of bone it is. It is certainly unique.
Jeff Marlin wrote: |
Just guessing of course, but I think it may have been either a type O or something resembling the one on the Albion Valkyrja.
At least I think it would look cool and appropriate with either of these types. It could have been something else of course, but the proportions of it as well as the artistic style seem to me to indicate a later type.
What really seems interesting about this guard is it's made of bone IIRC. Not too many of those around. The quality of the carving is just masterful, and if you look carefully it seems to have the remains of some silver inlay in some of those lines.
This is one of those bits that really makes me wish we had the whole thing. What a marvelous weapon it must have been.
Does anyone know where this one was found? |
Posts: 14 Location: Illinois
Sat 11 Jul, 2009 10:07 am
I have to admit I'm not sure of the material. It was described as bone in one of the Osprey books, but it may possibly be walrus ivory discolored by soil chemistry.
And thanks for the other view. I didn't know those surfaces were decorated.
Posts: 152 Location: France
Sun 12 Jul, 2009 3:11 am
Jeff Marlin wrote: |
I have to admit I'm not sure of the material. It was described as bone in one of the Osprey books, but it may possibly be walrus ivory discolored by soil chemistry. |
This has already been discussed in another thread. Osprey is wrong, this guard is made of copper with niello and silver inlays. It was found in the sea by a scuba diver twenty six kilometers from the Welsh coast (Pembrokeshire).
Posts: 1,606 Location: Chicago, Illinois
Sun 12 Jul, 2009 10:05 am
Jean Le-Palud wrote: |
Jeff Marlin wrote: | I have to admit I'm not sure of the material. It was described as bone in one of the Osprey books, but it may possibly be walrus ivory discolored by soil chemistry. |
This has already been discussed in another thread. Osprey is wrong, this guard is made of copper with niello and silver inlays. It was found in the sea by a scuba diver twenty six kilometers from the Welsh coast (Pembrokeshire). |
You don't happen to remeber the thread do you? I'd like to know more about this piece....
Posts: 11,553 Location: San Francisco
Sun 12 Jul, 2009 10:34 am
Posts: 152 Location: France
Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:48 pm
Thank you Nathan, yes it's this thread that I was speaking of.
Following my book the guard is dated of the first quarter of 12th century.
Posts: 11,553 Location: San Francisco
Sun 12 Jul, 2009 9:59 pm
Jean Le-Palud wrote: |
Thank you Nathan, yes it's this thread that I was speaking of.
Following my book the guard is dated of the first quarter of 12th century. |
Great info in that topic. I just re-read it front to back.
Posts: 1,576 Location: Bergen, Norway
Mon 13 Jul, 2009 4:53 am
If your should put in in a Pettersen category, it would probably be a type T, wich can in some cases have slightly bent guards. (ah, the wonders of being Norwegian)
However, keep in mind that Pettersens book was written 90 years ago, and only deals with Norwegian finds, though with some refference to foreign finds, IF the type was also found in Norway.
So purely saxon, slavic or frankish types from the same time period would not be included.
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum