Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Leather defences in High Medieval Era (Europe) Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Robert Morgan




Location: Sunny SoCal
Joined: 10 Sep 2012

Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sat 05 Oct, 2013 10:02 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sorry for coming to this late.


Quote:
I was however wondering if so many layers haven't been impeding movement too much.

Guess they haven't though, if they were worn.


A lot depends upon the slipperiness of the fabrics and textures. It may be that the various layers were worn in such a way that the slicker textures actually allowed for a fair degree of movement. A lot depended upon the order of the layering. If you'll look up the clothing that Mallory and Irvine wore on their ill-fated summit attempt, you'll see what I'm talking about. Graham Hoyland's book has a very illuminating section on this. It turns out that because of the order in which Mallory layered the various layers of gaberdine, silks, etc., he actually had far better mobility than modern climbers do in their obviously more modern gear. It took far less energy to move in those old clothes than it takes modern climbers. Every "rough" texture was faced by a slick one, so nothing "caught" on the rough texture. You wouldn't expect to move well in two layers of wool, for example, as the wool would exact an energy penalty to move smoothly as the two rough layers rubbed against each other. I would expect that medieval gear was similar in layering concept, in addition to the obvious protective benefits that layering brought. After all, those guys had to move fast and unemcumbered.

Just an idea. Do we know the order of the average chain mail wearing medieval knight's kit? It may be interesting to look at that and see if my idea is correct or not.

Bob
View user's profile Send private message
William P




Location: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 11 Jul 2010

Posts: 1,523

PostPosted: Sun 06 Oct, 2013 7:23 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

one definate example (from the 15th century) s of a man depicted in the painting 'the matyrdom of st ursula' wearing maile under a padded jack,
One argument i have heard regarding this is that of sizing and fitting, depending on it's thickness, a padded gambeson will mean that a well fitted piece of maile is likely to be a bit bigger, thus a bit more expensive, there is also the factor of the gambeson being on TOP to foil the efforts of needle pointed weapons easily breaking maile links, the maile nderneath taking care of any slicing and slashing weapons

notably, this man though is wearing jack chains on his arms to help protect his limbs.

another source is that of the byzantine armies of the 10th or so century, a bit earlier than this focus, and not western europe eiter, but it WAS done, most of this is, from what Ive heard, according to the military manuals of the time, some of their troops used both the kavadion (under armour padded gambeson) and epilorikion (an over-armour quilted defense), but this second layer was usually only worn by the heavier troops, usually top end cavalrymen. Whereas the Kavadion, either as a standalone defense, or in conjunction with other armour was used by pretty much the whole army.



 Attachment: 60.25 KB
36ursu06_jack.jpg
this is a image of a man depicted in the painting 'the martyrdom of St Ursula, he is shown wearing maile UNDER his padded jack
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Robert Morgan




Location: Sunny SoCal
Joined: 10 Sep 2012

Posts: 90

PostPosted: Sun 06 Oct, 2013 7:40 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

An interesting image. So, we have a slick hose layer underneath, then the "rougher" mail, and finally a hypothetically slicker padded jack. One could imaghine the two slicker layers moving reasonably well over the rougher mail layer.

Bob
View user's profile Send private message
William P




Location: Sydney, Australia
Joined: 11 Jul 2010

Posts: 1,523

PostPosted: Sun 06 Oct, 2013 8:03 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

http://www.companie-of-st-george.ch/cms/?q=en...k-series-1

I also just found this page, looking up the Martyrdom painting that examines the padded jack more closely it doesnt give any speculation why the maile is under, not over the jack, though.

as for the byzantines, going a tad bit off topic, there is a scarce bit of evidence suggesting kataphract lower limb defences may have been made of densely quilted cloth, one piece of protective gear i have seen that made me stand up and say 'that might just work' is the Kote, i.e the gauntlets used by kendo practitioners.
The 'vambrace' part of the kote is made purely of fabric, and the kote is definetely rigid. (I asked a few people about whether these were made purely of fabric, without some plastic reinforcement or something. and they confirmed it for me )
While that vambrace might be a bit small, and a bit thin to stand up to a full blown battlefield scenario, a thicker varient would, I think have the capacity of stopping sword blows, however this hasn't been tested in any way so this is pure speculation on my part.
Close-up of the stitching of the Kote.
http://a248.e.akamai.net/origin-cdn.volusion....1370569645

A pair of kote
http://tezashibogu.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/kote-terms.jpg
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lafayette C Curtis




Location: Indonesia
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 2,698

PostPosted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013 9:50 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I vaguely recall an old thread where it was mentioned that having mail sandwiched between two relatively lightly-padded layers of fabric (or a lightly-padded layer underneath and a thick but unpadded layer above) gave more protection than a more thickly-padded garment either above or beneath the mail. I haven't been able to dig up the link, though. The only thing I remember clearly is that the conclusion resulted from experiments in a (modern) jousting arena or tournament.
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013 2:00 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

William P wrote:
as for the byzantines, going a tad bit off topic, there is a scarce bit of evidence suggesting kataphract lower limb defences may have been made of densely quilted cloth, one piece of protective gear i have seen that made me stand up and say 'that might just work' is the Kote, i.e the gauntlets used by kendo practitioners.
The 'vambrace' part of the kote is made purely of fabric, and the kote is definetely rigid. (I asked a few people about whether these were made purely of fabric, without some plastic reinforcement or something. and they confirmed it for me )
While that vambrace might be a bit small, and a bit thin to stand up to a full blown battlefield scenario, a thicker varient would, I think have the capacity of stopping sword blows, however this hasn't been tested in any way so this is pure speculation on my part.

You are starting to see the light. This is how textile armour has been made for thousands of years in unrelated cultures all over the world. I've been trying to exaplain that on RAT for years now - every time someone brings up the bollocks about glued linothoraxes. Here is the latest thread.
http://www.romanarmytalk.com/19-greek-militar...-book.html
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Griffin




Location: The Welsh Marches, in the hills above Newtown, Powys.
Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 802

PostPosted: Tue 08 Oct, 2013 2:43 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I've only just come across this thread, very interesting and thought provoking.

It may be a spurious and not very scientific form of testing but has anyone subjected kendo armour to damage from arrows and swords, point or edge? It seems that might add something. It won't prove the construction techniques of bronze age armour but it will show how good that type of armour is...or not as the case may be.

Cheap bogu off ebay and off you go!

Griff
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Griffin




Location: The Welsh Marches, in the hills above Newtown, Powys.
Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 802

PostPosted: Wed 09 Oct, 2013 3:26 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
I vaguely recall an old thread where it was mentioned that having mail sandwiched between two relatively lightly-padded layers of fabric


Its annoying to be still years away from finishing my house/study/office and having all my journals and ref material in boxes in store but from my memory I seem to recall that there are refs to 'scottish' or 'welsh' jacks and some feelings, with some other evidence to back them up, that mail and horn plates were used in their construction. I'd have thought an old mail shirt inside some uilted linen would be excellent protection.
View user's profile Send private message
Dan Howard




Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
Joined: 08 Dec 2004

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 3,636

PostPosted: Wed 09 Oct, 2013 3:43 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

You snipped the important part of the post. There is plenty of evidence of mail sandwiched between padding. In the Middle East they were called kazaghands. Around the same time in Europe they were called jazerants. A couple of centuries later they were called gestrons. And later they were simply called "jacks stuffed with mail". Lafayette is not questioning their existence, he is suggesting that they might provide better protection than the same mail combined with a single thick layer of padding.
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Griffin




Location: The Welsh Marches, in the hills above Newtown, Powys.
Joined: 28 Dec 2006

Posts: 802

PostPosted: Wed 09 Oct, 2013 4:33 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Wasn't debating that, all you say is true effendi! They certainly existed.

Always thought that many of the Beauchamp Pageant soldiers are wearing the very same. Something padded but augmented in some way.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Leather defences in High Medieval Era (Europe)
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum