XIIIb.2 Sword in the Cleveland Museum
Just a quick question about "XIIIb.2 From the Severance Collection, Cleveland Museum, Ohio" on the Spotlight: Oakeshott Type XIII Swords page:

http://www.myArmoury.com/feature_spotxiii.html

[ Linked Image ]

Is this sword featured in the book "Arms & Armor: The Cleveland Museum of Art by Stephen N. Fliegel" or on the website of The Cleveland Museum of Art?


http://www.clevelandart.org/


I've had a look through the book and gone through the above website and couldn't find it.

Thanks

Danny
Hey Danny,
It appears on page 110 of Fliegel's book. Unfortunately, it is only a hilt and upper 1/3 or the blade shot.
I hope this helps,
Dan
Dan

Thanks for that. I thought that was the sword.

The book and the Cleveland Museum website have the following information:

http://www.clevelandart.org/explore/work.asp?...;view=more
Title:Sword
Maker:Germany (?), 15th century
Medium: steel; wood and leather grip
Measurements: Overall: 104.2cm, Blade: 87.3cm, quillons: 20.3cm
Date:15th century
Classification: Arms and Armor
Acquisition: Gift of Mr. and Mrs. John L. Severance
Location: Gallery 19 | Armor Court: European Arms & Armor, 1400–1700
Accession Number:1916.1600


The Spotlight page says:

XIIIb.2 From the Severance Collection, Cleveland Museum, Ohio
Dating circa 1240-80, this example has a blade aproximately 32" long. It's been well kept, perhaps preserved in a church. The grip is a modern replacement and is criticized by Oakeshott as being too fat, lessening the impact of this otherwise nicely proportioned sword. An unusual feature of this sword is the way the shallow fuller ends before hitting the cross-guard.


There's a big difference between the 15th century and circa 1240-80, Which one is more accurate?

Danny
I wish the Cleveland Museum had included the sword's weight in their information.
Danny Grigg wrote:


There's a big difference between the 15th century and circa 1240-80, Which one is more accurate?

Danny

I'd have to go with Oakeshott on this one, judging by the general style.
Dan
Roger Hooper wrote:
I wish the Cleveland Museum had included the sword's weight in their information.



The book has the following info on page 170:

Overall, l. 140.2 (1.72 kg); blade, l. 87.3; quillons, w. 20.3

Website says:

Measurements: Overall: 104.2cm, Blade: 87.3cm, quillons: 20.3cm

I'm guessing the overall length in the book is a typo........

Danny

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum