Funny thing is, and this might be a surprise given what reproductions I own, but the Witham sword is one of my favorite antiques out there. I was lucky to see it at the British Museum a few years back and even in the case, the characteristics come out. It's beautifully proportioned.

Here are photos I took while visiting the British Museum:

[ Linked Image ]

[ Linked Image ]

[ Linked Image ]

[ Linked Image ]

Eric McHugh with the original.
[ Linked Image ]

This gives you a good sense of the swords scale.

I was green with envy when Eric sent me this photo several years ago. To have the opportunity to do a hands-on examination of what was a favorite for both of us must have been a real thrill. I'll speak for Eric here for just a bit and I hope I'm not giving away any secrets. :D

When Peter and Eric made that particular research trip it was blind luck they happened to show up when this sword was out for a routine cleaning. To anyones knowledge they are the only modern sword makers to have the opportunity to do a detailed hands-on evaluation of this sword. Others, like the smiths I've commisioned for this sword in the past, have had to look at it through a pane of glass. Consequently, if this is a favorite like it is for me, this is the best opportunity one is likely to get to obtain an example as close as possible to the original.

I've been dealing with this stuff for a long time and anymore it takes a lot to get me excited. This one excites me.

This is a lovely sword and I am glad to see someone doing justice to this original. Even though it isn't supposed to be an exact copy, the lineage shows clearly.
It is exciting to see that new designs are still in the works at Albion but I can't help but wonder how/why a model that has just been announced will be in production in only a few months when there are models that have been availible for reservation for a few years and are still not being produced?

This is tempting to me as well, gentlefolk. I've been in a holding pattern with regards
to ordering a blade from Albion, and I have that similar " gut feeling " I had when I saw
The Baron and The Duke for the first time in their drawing stage ...

It would be interesting to see a picture of the sword its based on ...

( Too bad Albion doesn't do sabers ... hehe )

Editting note : Ask and ye shall receive ! Thanks for posting some pics ... B-)

I wonder if Albion will offer an alternative version of this sword with the text on the blade?

Very interesting sword.
I think that a sword like this really is outside the typical Oakeshott description system

Best regards
Stephan

What I really like about this sword and the Oakeshott is the fact that they are very close to signficant swords. As Peter has pointed out for various reasons there are some minor diffeences that exclude them from being Museum Line, but for all intents and purposes the handling is the same as the respective original swords, which for me is the most important aspect of the swords design.

Peters post also makes me realise that the more I think I am learning about swords, the more I need to learn and for every question that gets answered, several new questions are usually raised.

The Albion Oakeshott has been mentioned a couple of times on this thread. I have one, and I have to say that it is as fine a sword as man could conceive. If the Vigil is even close to its quality, then it will indeed be a great sword.

An excellent choice for Albion to recreate, I'm going to look forward to seeing the prototype of this sword.

Wow I cant wait to see the finnished product. I've always been a fan of double fullered blades and this is my favourate example.

Can they inlay metal without forging?

M.

Does anyone have a good picture of the full inscription? The first one Nathan posted has a bit of a glare obscuring the end (otherwise a great photo though ;) )

EDIT: D'oh, never mind...I somehow missed the zoom-in picture that Nathan also posted....

I don't want to say too much because I do not speak for Howy, Peter or Albion. I want to be very respectful of that relationship because we are all very close friends. With that said, it is hard to not comment about this sword.

First, this is not an exact repro of the mentioned sword. The British Museum claims the rights to the mentioned sword, so obviously this is not an exact repro of the mentioned sword.

With that understanding, I need to say that this sword is sublime! To me it is the quintessential "knightly" sword. It shows a high level of craftsmenship. In addition, the maker had a keen understanding of sword balance as well as a good understanding of edge geometry. The maker managed to combine several elements that are not often seen in similar swords. At approx. 2.6 pounds (1.18 kilos), this sword is light for its size; but the maker did not allow the reduced weight to compromise the swords cutting ability. When you examine the blade, it is clear that the maker gave this agile blade a brutal, complex cutting edge. The balance of the sword is another indication of the makers expertise. This sword is very responsive. As Peter mentioned, it would be excellent for sword and buckler. But make no mistake about it, this sword would be just as well suited as the weapon of a knight on horse back...perhaps at the Battle of Lincoln. Who knows?

In short, if you are drawn to the "knightly" sword, this is the sword to get. Peter has done a outstanding job of translating the essential elements of this sword. Sword lovers will not be disappointed.

What Peter and Eric have said given their respective knowledge and the opportunity to handle the sword this is based on makes me look at swords like this with less emphasis on their typology and stats. I know that the typology is a very important modern research tool and helps us define swords for the purposes of study and helping us understand what they were made for and why, but this is one of those swords that seems to blow all attempts at definition out of the water and to try and encompass it within a certain type seems doomed to failure. For example one of the things I thought I knew about the difference between type X or Xa and type XII was that the later represented a big leap forward in sword technology with regards to thrusting ability and responsiveness, yet we have two examples (and many more that I am not aware of) being Xa.1 and the River Witham sword that the Vigil is based on, that are apparantley earlier swords, but show distinct characteristics that do not fit neatly into the broad descriptions given for their respective typologies, and that are also as responsive if not more so than maybe a typical XII. All I know is that the Vigil is another on my must have list.

I'll add these old pictures from another thread as a little taster for you who haven't seen them:

---

 Attachment: 27.51 KB



 Attachment: 78.8 KB



 Attachment: 89.39 KB