How effective was armor of proof?
The title is self evident, discuss! :D

BTW Is it true that a Lorica Segmenata can shrug off a ballista bolt?
Probably depends a lot on when and how it was proofed against what. From what I can recall Swedish breastplates in the late 17th century where proofed by placing them against a stuffed sack, and then shooting them with the standard infantry musket at twenty paces. These breastplates would have been about 8mm thick I think. Use less powerful weapons to proof with, and you could end up with considerably weaker (and lighter) armour passing.
Segmentata cannot "shrug off" a ballista bolt, no.

M.
M. Eversberg II wrote:
Segmentata cannot "shrug off" a ballista bolt, no.

M.


Okay thanks for the info
I was just wondering because I heard about a show on The History Channel (Before the days of modern
marvels and apocalypse) where a bolt bounced off

BTW does anyone know where I could find this video?

Thanks for the info on proofed plate
Ben P. wrote:
I was just wondering because I heard about a show on The History Channel (Before the days of modern
marvels and apocalypse) where a bolt bounced off


The test sample didn't shrug it off. The plates were severely dented and would have caused blunt trauma to the wearer. However the test piece used plates that were thicker that what was typically worn by the legionaries.
Arr ye matey! Thar search function is yer best friend:

http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...stol+proof

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum