Help identifying marks on 1796 Sword
Hi, first post, so I hope I am complying with forum rules!

I found the forum through an internet trawl having been given what is purported to be a 1796 Heavy Cavalry sword. Condition seems quite good so my immediate thoughts where it was a replica. Notwithstanding this it has the following marks

On the scabbard - OSBORN & Co. Birmingham

On the edge of the blade near the hilt in cursive script
J.J. RunKel Sohlingen - I think

and on the side near the hilt a circle with a bump at the top and a 1 inside, with a 4 below (not a great description!)

photos can (hopefully) be seen here

http://www.flickr.com/photos/14390133@N06/

Any help or advice on
storing/maintaining the sword (I am more used to firearms than edged weapons)
what the marks on the side of the blade may mean

Thanks

David
Help Identifying Marks on 1796 Sword
You are right, David.
The markings on your sword's blade says it all - "J.J. Runkel Solingen".
Runkel were one of the main Solingen blade makers of the time and Osborn were one of the main British makers - presumably they hilted and finished this using a Runkel blade.

Matt
Runkel was a German immigrant who lived in England and imported blades from Solingen. According to OldSwords.com, Runkel operated at Tookes Court in London from 1795-1808; and Henry Osborn operated at various addresses in Birmingham and London from 1785-1807. I am not sure if Osborn ever bought blades from Runkel to fulfill contracts. Another explanation is that the Runkel sword lost its scabbard and was paired with a spare one that was made by Osborn.

Jonathan
Yes, that seems perhaps more likely.

Matt
Thanks for input, looks like it was an ok gift (as it was free)! :D

David
Matt Easton wrote:
Runkel were one of the main Solingen blade makers of the time and Osborn were one of the main British makers - presumably they hilted and finished this using a Runkel blade.

Matt


There were 2 of these at the last London Arms fair Matt. They are replicas spuriously marked.
The easiest way to spot them by sight is the curious border on the langet, the broad grip and narrow scabbard. But when you pick them up they are much too heavy and the wrong balance for an original.

D
The stamp is also wrong...
Seems it is a replica but not a bad present. You could always get someone to thin it out to improve handling.
Alan
These posts are 8 years old :D
David Cooper wrote:
Alan
These posts are 8 years old :D

At my age 8 years are nothing... :p

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum