Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > 100 year war era sword. Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
P. Cha




PostPosted: Wed 16 Jan, 2008 9:11 pm    Post subject: 100 year war era sword.         Reply with quote

Okay so I was looking to add to my collection and want one from this era for my next sword. I have read most of the reviews on this site and the albion agincourt and crecy along with the A&A's black prince are of particular favorites of mine. Is there any other I should be looking at? How accurate are the albions for that period with those two swords? I noticed that the black prince weights more then the agincourt by about 5 ounces but has a balance point about 1 inch closer. Which of the two is the faster sword? I figure the crecy with it's balance out at 4 inches would be slower then the other two, but does the added cutting power make up for it in your honest opinion? All in all, if you were a knight during the 100 year war era and could have any sword you can buy today, which one would it be is what I'm asking to help me pick one Happy...yeah I wish I could afford all three, but my project car also demands money of me.
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Wed 16 Jan, 2008 10:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

A balance point being an inch closer or farther will have less to do with a "fast" feeling than other factors, such as overall mass distribution. Also, an inch farther out in PoB isn't going to automatically equal a more powerful cutter. The PoB is but one factor in handling.

As a further point, the Sempach and Regent in my collection have basically the same POB. Yet they don't really handle the same at all. That's by design. The PoB is just one factor that goes into handling.

To answer your question: having handled both the Crecy and the Black Prince, I found the Crecy to be faster (and it wasn't even close) but some of this is subjective and will vary user to user. Part of it is the circa 10 ounce difference in weight: the Crecy weighs less, despite the being a tad longer. More of it has to do with where the mass is and how it moves (pivot points).

I also think the Crecy is far more wieldable one-handed than the BP.


I haven't handled any of Albion's long Type XVa's so I can't comment there.

Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Craig Peters




PostPosted: Wed 16 Jan, 2008 11:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I can't speak about the Agincourt, but I have handled the Fiore, which has the exact same blade (although different hilt furniture). It was one of the most agile and lively feeling swords I have ever handled. But, generally speaking, XVIa swords have some of the best handling available of any swords in the Oakeshott typology. At least, that's been my experience.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > 100 year war era sword.
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum