Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Sword or sabre? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Boris Bedrosov
Industry Professional



Location: Bourgas, Bulgaria
Joined: 06 Nov 2005

Posts: 700

PostPosted: Wed 04 Jan, 2006 11:54 am    Post subject: Sword or sabre?         Reply with quote

Hello everyone!

First of all, let me wish you all the best in the new 2006!

In this topic I don't want to talk about your choice - sword or sabre, but I want to discuss one interesting, on my oppinion, question. This is the question of the terminology, or how is better to be called the weapons, which have features, specific for both types (swords and sabres) in same time? So, what is the best way to call them?
There are at least two weapons of this type - the Japanese katana and the pallash (or cavalry backsword if you want). We can add another in this list - the falchion, the Caucasian shashka, or even the Turkish yathagan and the ancient kopsis. So, if the katana is a sword - what about its curved blade (typical sabre feature), and what about the straight blade of the pallash with its mass, heavier than the sabre (which are features more typical for the sword)?
Are the only traditions important, or we have to consider other things?
What is your oppinion about this?
Thanks in advance for all your replies

Regards!
Boris

"Everyone who has the right to wear a long sword, has to remember that his sword is his soul,
and he has to separate from it when he separates from his life"
Tokugawa Ieyasu

Find my works on Facebook:
Boris Bedrosov's Armoury
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Wed 04 Jan, 2006 12:01 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I would suggest that we should primarily just call these weapons what they were called in their own time and culture. Otherwise, we use embarrasingly ethnocentric descriptions like we sometimes find in 19th and early 20th c. writing. "Nipponese Saber," and such. Also, as you point out, it's very difficult (not mention unnecessary) to force these weapons into neat categories. For purposes of defining a given type, I think we should simply describe–"long, narrow, slightly-curved, single-edged blade" as opposed to "saber blade".
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Boris Bedrosov
Industry Professional



Location: Bourgas, Bulgaria
Joined: 06 Nov 2005

Posts: 700

PostPosted: Wed 04 Jan, 2006 12:35 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sean!

You are absolutely right. We should call them as in original. Even in the Japanese the name of the group of all Japanese edge weapons is nihhon-to (or nippon-to) - "Japanese sword". Using the original name is OK, but when we come to the description - what should we write? "The pallash is a .... What - "sabre" or "sword"?...with long, straight blade". If we say "cavalry edge weapon" - OK again. But "BUT" always remains.

Regards!
Boris

"Everyone who has the right to wear a long sword, has to remember that his sword is his soul,
and he has to separate from it when he separates from his life"
Tokugawa Ieyasu

Find my works on Facebook:
Boris Bedrosov's Armoury
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hisham Gaballa





Joined: 27 Jan 2005
Reading list: 7 books

Posts: 508

PostPosted: Thu 05 Jan, 2006 8:27 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sean Flynt wrote:
I would suggest that we should primarily just call these weapons what they were called in their own time and culture. Otherwise, we use embarrasingly ethnocentric descriptions like we sometimes find in 19th and early 20th c. writing. "Nipponese Saber," and such. Also, as you point out, it's very difficult (not mention unnecessary) to force these weapons into neat categories. For purposes of defining a given type, I think we should simply describe–"long, narrow, slightly-curved, single-edged blade" as opposed to "saber blade".


This is fine with me, but my particular interest is Middle-Eastern and Indian weapons and armour. I do get annoyed when kilijs, shamshirs, talwars and pulwars are all lumped together as "scimitars". On the other hand I cannot expect a lay-person to know the names of all these different types of weapon and what are the characteristics of each. So I am more than happy for the generic term "sabre" to be used, at least it's better than "scimitar". Happy
View user's profile Send private message
Joe Yurgil





Joined: 01 Jun 2004

Posts: 122

PostPosted: Thu 05 Jan, 2006 8:52 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I agree things should be refered to in the original but I can also understand using 'sabre blade' or derrivations to describe a sword to someone who isnt familiar with the type.

Person A: What is a katana?

Person B: It is a type of sword which is sort of like a two handed sabre...

It isnt nessesarily ethnocentrism, just a way to understand the unfamiliar.

I know absolutly nothing about Indian sword so when someone says kilij, shamshir, talwar or pulwar, for me to visualize it it is helpful to say scimitar (which at least denotes a non European sword) or sabre and then go into more detail from there.

In the end the term that should be used is the term that can be understood.

Sjá, þar sé ek föður minn.
Sjá, þar sé ek móður mina ok systur mina ok bróður minn.
Sjá, þar sé ek allan minn frændgarð.
Sjá, kalla þeim tíl min.
Biðja mér at taka minn stað hjá þeim í sölum Valhallar, þar drengiligr menn munu lifa allan aldr.
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Thu 05 Jan, 2006 9:06 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

To say that something unfamiliar is like something familiar is perfectly reasonable and helpful. To say that something is something familiar is misguided, I think. In other words, while it makes sense to describe the blade of the katana as being somewhat like a saber blade, it would be inappropriate to categorize the katana as a saber, which, as I understood it, was the question raised in the original post. Another example: A naginata is like a glaive, but it isn't a glaive and shouldn't be categorized as one.
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Fri 06 Jan, 2006 12:03 pm    Post subject: Sword or Saber         Reply with quote

I completely agree with Sean Flynt. call it by its proper name. Sword names change with the times, and now the term broadsword can mean most anything, whereas it was orionally intended to mean the military sword. Also its like squares and rectangles, all sabers are swords, but not all swords are sabers.
Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Boris Bedrosov
Industry Professional



Location: Bourgas, Bulgaria
Joined: 06 Nov 2005

Posts: 700

PostPosted: Fri 06 Jan, 2006 1:32 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hank!

I agree with you. But I remember something interesting - the national languages, and maybe traditions.
The English is OK, because you have different words for different types of weapons, but in Bulgarian its not like this. Just one example - the word "kopie" means everything of lance, spear, pike and note it doesn't show its exactly type. In the same way we haven't words which mean broadsword and backsword, and the word "rapira" (you see it's close to the English "rapier") actually means epiee, rather than rapier. I know it's a matter of terminology, but sometimes I'm very confused when read articles in English - what is this, or what is that. From the other hand, the meanings of the terms changed in time.
So, is it better to categorize the weapons or not? Should we say this is like this, or should we say this is this.
About the traditions I will give just one example. All over the world (including in English language sources) it is said that naginata is a Japanese halberd, but it isn't. So what in this case?

Regards!
Boris

"Everyone who has the right to wear a long sword, has to remember that his sword is his soul,
and he has to separate from it when he separates from his life"
Tokugawa Ieyasu

Find my works on Facebook:
Boris Bedrosov's Armoury
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Fri 06 Jan, 2006 1:41 pm    Post subject: Sword or Saber         Reply with quote

Boris, an excellent post and you bring up quite an interesting question when having to deal with languages other than your own. I do not think there are any hard and fast rules that can be set up. It makes for an interesting problem is someone translates, and yet does not know weaponry. I think that is the case with calling a Naginata a halberd. While it is closer to a bill or glaive, it is not a halberd, nor is it a glaive or bill. It is a naginata. In another post, I run inot this same problem when talking about the Viking "halberd. It is not a halberd, but that is how it is translated and at times it would be called a bill. Gets quite confusing, and the only solution that I see is a photo of the object plaus a good description. Best, Hank
Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Robert B. Allison




Location: NW Montana
Joined: 21 Apr 2005

Posts: 50

PostPosted: Fri 06 Jan, 2006 2:42 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gosh, maybe I'm missing something, but isn't the term 'sword' a very broad one, kind of like 'gun', and the term 'saber' (or sabre) simply a slightly more narrow and specific sub-type? Kind of like 'gun' and 'semi-automatic rifle'?
View user's profile Send private message
Laloë Franck




Location: yvelines, France
Joined: 09 Jan 2006

Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed 11 Jan, 2006 9:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hello
I preciser is allowed that I.L considere like sabre or "protosabre" any weapon long, has single edge whose back of the blade is definitely thicker, that it is curved or not. It considere thus like sword and not sabre the weapon scythe of Zlatopil which dates from IVe century before J.C!!!

-Franck-
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Laloë Franck




Location: yvelines, France
Joined: 09 Jan 2006

Posts: 20

PostPosted: Wed 11 Jan, 2006 10:00 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hi
It is still Franck
By I.L I wanted to say Iaroslav Lebedynsky (professor at the INALCO, Paris). Sorry, I made a draft and I forgot of the name!
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Hank Reinhardt
Industry Professional



Location: oxford,ga.
Joined: 10 Nov 2005
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 138

PostPosted: Wed 11 Jan, 2006 10:30 am    Post subject: Sword or Saber         Reply with quote

Hmmm, the 1913 US Cavalry saber is double edged, straight, and the thickness is more to the center of the blade. Sim iliar in description to some rapiers or even cut and thrust swords, and yet it is a saber, and intended to be used as one. I just do not think you can set up a working definition for a saber.
Hank Reinhardt
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Greyson Brown




Location: Windsor, Colorado
Joined: 22 Nov 2004
Reading list: 15 books

Posts: 813

PostPosted: Wed 11 Jan, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I think that Sean and Hank have both summed up the point (pun not intended, but certainly not avoided) in a couple of their posts. In some cases, even swords that are placed in a given catagory defy the definition that defines that catagory, and one still has to be able to decribe these swords to other people.

I hate to sound like your high school English or speech teacher, but this is why you have to know your audience. For example, it makes perfect sense to say "it is similar to an Oakeshott Type XII, but with an indented ricasso," because most of the people who read this site know what the terms in that description mean. If they don't, there are articles that explain it, and a forum where they can ask for clarification (though, the latter probably means the author got carried away). If I am talking to my coworkers (who do not know the difference in these things, and do not want to take the time to learn), then I have to use a different method of explaining things. I might have to compare a sword to something as absurd as a screwdriver.

Obviously, language barriers make this a bit trickier, but as long as there some agreed upon terms or generalizations, then descriptions can be built off of that. A 1913 US Cavalry saber may not fit the perfect description of a saber, but, by using it as a starting point, we can produce clear descriptions that give a read a decent sense of what is being discussed. Like wise, I think that some one could describe a falchion by saying, "it is a sword, but..." or by saying, "it is a saber, but..." and still end up with a valid, understandable description.

So... yes, using terms like "sword," "saber," "spear," and "glaive" is usefull. On other hand, do not be afraid to clarify, or qualify those statements. Above all, do not be afraid of, "but..."

-Grey

"So long as I can keep the path of honor I am well content."
-Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, The White Company
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Sword or sabre?
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum