Jeff Gentry wrote: |
I won't be able to make it next weekend, somethign has come up.
Sorry was looking forward to it. |
Jeff,
Sorry to hear that. Hopefully we'll see you at the next gathering.
Jeff Gentry wrote: |
I won't be able to make it next weekend, somethign has come up.
Sorry was looking forward to it. |
Jeff Gentry wrote: |
Hey Chad
I won't be able to make it next weekend, somethign has come up. Sorry was looking forward to it. Jeff |
Quote: |
The group, minus Mark Mattimore. |
Greyson Brown wrote: |
So.... tell me about that Crecy. |
Joe Fults wrote: |
Good gathering, good weather, a good time.
Now for the opinion part of this post. This is my opinion only and is colored by my preferences. It idoes NOT represent the opinion of anybody other than me!! :-) The Crecy... ...I think its a bit of an oddball. I also think it represents on of the best values in the Next Gen line. Especially for a beginner who is working to difine sword preference. It is a solid value and an ideal starter sword. The Crecy is not a single hander and it is not a longsword either. It sits on the fence between the two, with all the benefits and drawbacks of being there. That's why I think its a good starter sword. If you're not sure what you like this is an affordable Albion to start with. I think it will grow with you no matter what direction you ultimately go, for a while. However, when I used it as a single hander I wanted a bit less sword. As a Longsword I wanted a bit more sword. Unfortunately it does not mesh with my preferences NOW. I want something distinctly single handed, or distinctly Longsword. A year or two ago this sword would have been a dream for me though. Many people are going to lovethe Crecy though for very good reasons. It does a reasonable job addressing requirements that are usually met by very different and distinct tools, at a reasonable price point. |
Greyson Brown wrote: |
Joe,
Thanks for the opinion. What you say seems very valid and thought out, but does raise a question in my mind. Namely, to what extent will the size of the person using the sword affect how they view it? As a small guy (5' 7", 140 pounds), I might find it to fit into the longsword catagory more. I know that very small people can comfortably use very large swords, but I have found that I have a personal preference towards swords of a more moderate scale. Either way, I know I will like it for what it is, and when the time comes to get a sword that is more definatively single- or two- handed... well, that is why they have the collector's club. -Grey |
Peter Johnsson wrote: |
I appreciate your evaluation Joe and thank you for your input. However, I feel like nit picking ;) |
Peter Johnsson wrote: |
-The Crécy *is* a Longsword. |
Peter Johnsson wrote: |
The Crécy might be a good beginner sword, because of its handling. |
Peter Johnsson wrote: |
It does however represent an authentic class of swords that were developed for their own merits. |
Peter Johnsson wrote: |
To disqualify these swords since they do not fill the same criteria as shorter single handers or bigger weapons is a mistake. |
Mark Weldon wrote: |
As the attendee who ordered the Crecy, perhaps I should weigh in with my impressions.
First, I would not discount Joe's opinions at all. When he talks about a beginner, I would fit that category. Joe has done some training with the longswords, and of course that will color his opinion on any piece in that category. Mark |
Mark Weldon wrote: |
The other attendees had good impressions of this sword also, so it should make a good seller for Albion. Mark |
Quote: |
First, I would not discount Joe's opinions at all. |
Patrick Kelly wrote: | ||
I don't think anyone's doing that. The sword's designer is simply elaborating on Joe's statement, which could have been a bit better worded in the Joe's initial post. I also think Joe's done a good job of clarifying his opinion is proceeding posts. |