(A) Is it possibly missing a pommel?
(B) If it hasn't lost a pommel, how was the tang peened and finished?
(C) How thick is the blade?
(D) what is the design of the belt attachments on the back of the sheath?
[ Linked Image ]

[ Download ]
Leo Todeschini wrote: |
NIce.
Yes it is missing a pommel, and the quillons look so mid 15thC, so I have a slight doubt over the 14thC attribution. From the shadows, the blade looks to be quite thick at 7-8mm I would guess, though for this size knife 6mm would be more normal. The fittings will most likely be folded over and soldered and the mouth will likely either have a ring or a staple for suspension - could be either. There are a few very similar sheath fitting sets made by Arms and Armour, Josh Davies and myself and you will find these if you search here. Good luck Tod |
Quote: |
You are right. What I looked at and saw a regular tang is in fact curled around on both the first and last daggers to form a loop. |
Kristjan Runarsson wrote: |
How would that have worked to retain the handle? |
Kristjan Runarsson wrote: |
That's what I was thinking because the loop may have been an attachment for a weapon chain. How would that have worked to retain the handle? |