I understand that these are not heavy fighting swords, but it's still a strange and interesting detail.


Dan D'Silva wrote: |
Thanks. So these cuttoes with open-ended fullers did originate as longer blades, but these were already cuttoe blades and not necessarily a whole lot longer, just that because the fuller already ran to the tip, shortening the blade by any amount resulted in losing the closed end. That makes sense to me. |
Dan D'Silva wrote: |
This is the very clearest example I've seen. I didn't bring it up at first because it has an asymmetrical point and wouldn't be a good illustration for the question I had about a spear point. |
Sean Manning wrote: | ||
Christian Cameron's favourite sword for the woods is like that: an owner in the late 18th / early 19th century had the hanger shortened by about 6". Much handier hiking in Algonquian National Park! |
Sean Manning wrote: |
Christian Cameron's favourite sword for the woods is like that: an owner in the late 18th / early 19th century had the hanger shortened by about 6". Much handier hiking in Algonquian National Park! |
Glen A Cleeton wrote: |
Whether a medieval sword, or modern bayonet, there may have been a want to shorten a blade but length offers the only perceived benefit. Some might argue it was done for a caping advantage but it dos not follow to me that it was a purposeful advantage.
Cheers GC |
Glen A Cleeton wrote: |
A novelist offering third party history?. Does Cameron have a journal for the fellow describing his penchant? Or is it speculation? |
Sean Manning wrote: | ||
I don't understand the question. Christian Cameron keeps creating, moving, and deleting websites so I have given up on trying to find and link his online essays. From memory, the hanger currently has a 20-24" blade, in his judgement it was originally 4-6" longer, and he finds this size much handier on multiple-day hikes in the woods than a 'medium-sized sword'. It seems to be a working-life modification, so it can't be older than the blade or younger than when people stopped carrying these in the 19th century. If you want more details about why he interprets his hanger that way ask him, I am reporting his interpretation not giving mine. I have never heard of a sword needing to be shortened by 4-6" after use, that sounds like a badly designed sword to me (if you have so-so steel, design a sword which puts easy demands on it). Swords often break close to the hilt, and Japanese swords sometimes chip at the point. But European swords in the 18th and 19th century are not an area of my expertise. |
Quote: | ||
Understood. Would you think it offers any disadvantages, like weakening the point in a thrust? I would think if it came to a spear point in the middle of the fuller, then the last fraction of an inch would be more likely to fold or break. |