Go to page Previous  1, 2

Happy birthday Patrick!

Beautiful dagger!
Really nice set you have there.

I aspire to own a Johnsson original piece someday. We'll see if that ever happens. :)
Patrick Kelly wrote:
Arne G. wrote:
How does the A&A version of this type of dagger compare with Peter's?


No criticism toward A&A, but that's really like comparing a Ford F150 to a Ferrari Testarossa (or whatever analogy car guys like to use). The A&A lacks much of the subtle shaping present in Peters example. However, the A&A is a solid entry at its price point and one I'd recommend. I won't comment on the price of the PJ, except to say, if you're going to climb that high you'd better take some oxygen. :) The A&A offering is made to a price point in order to be a competitive product and I think it succeeds. This dagger is a one off, made by a master smith with an eye towards execution of fine detail and authenticity, without the concerns of affordability and repeatability in a production environment. They both succeed in their intent, but they're really two different things.


I'm curious about the "subtle shaping" you mention. Could you elaborate? I'm aware of at least some of the production short cuts taken by A&A - for example, the use of a threaded nut to compress the hilt assembly which is then peened. While the purist in me snubs its nose, having reworked a couple of older A&A pieces I can certainly appreciate the ease which it brings to the assembly process!

I suspect at least part of it is having a reinforced tip - there is an example up for sale on the classifieds here for an arming sword with this feature - and I believe that is a detail often, if not invariably, missed in most reproductions today. There are a lot of small but important details such as those that go missing, since they seem to be unpublished. I'd dearly love to see Peter Johnsson or Tobias Capwell publish a book dedicated to Medieval daggers that, in addition to the hilt types and variations, goes into the subtle details of the blade form and so forth.
Arne G. wrote:


I'm curious about the "subtle shaping" you mention. Could you elaborate? I'm aware of at least some of the production short cuts taken by A&A - for example, the use of a threaded nut to compress the hilt assembly which is then peened. While the purist in me snubs its nose, having reworked a couple of older A&A pieces I can certainly appreciate the ease which it brings to the assembly process!

I suspect at least part of it is having a reinforced tip - there is an example up for sale on the classifieds here for an arming sword with this feature - and I believe that is a detail often, if not invariably, missed in most reproductions today. There are a lot of small but important details such as those that go missing, since they seem to be unpublished. I'd dearly love to see Peter Johnsson or Tobias Capwell publish a book dedicated to Medieval daggers that, in addition to the hilt types and variations, goes into the subtle details of the blade form and so forth.


Compare the A&A dagger here to the photos above.

The pommel on the A&A dagger is perfect circle and lacks the subtle oval shape of the Johnsson , or the original.

[ Linked Image ]

The guard on the A&A is far more blocky than the Johnsson and lacks the latters more elegant shaping.

[ Linked Image ]

The A&As fuller is a simple pencil fuller machined down the blade's center line, lacking the graceful shape and matching profile of the Johnsson.

[ Linked Image ]

As shown, the grip treatment on the A&A offering is far more basic and less detailed. The A&A's blade is ground from stock and the hilt components are investment cast, compared to the forged nature of the Johnsson.

None of this results in a bad product, but rather a product built to a price point, with concerns towards repeatability and production time. For the stated $350.00 I think the A&A is a nice piece.


Last edited by Patrick Kelly on Mon 14 Dec, 2020 4:14 pm; edited 2 times in total
Paul Hansen wrote:
Happy birthday Patrick!

Beautiful dagger!


Thank you Paul. It was a nice treat and I breathed a sigh of relief when it arrived unmolested. The Tod Dagger that was supposed to be my B-day present is sitting in purgatory at the PO's International Shipping Center in Chicago, a place commonly known as "where packages go to die". Given the facilities track record it might be here by next Christmas. :).
Michael P. Smith wrote:
Really nice set you have there.

I aspire to own a Johnsson original piece someday. We'll see if that ever happens. :)


It only took me twenty years to acquire these two, so patience. :)
I down-loaded Peter's photos of the original, and I plan to make of these for myself. It's a beauty.
Congratulations on the acquisition! There's four makers I want to acquire pieces from. Vince Evans (been very fortunate there) Peter Johhnson, Patrick Barta and Jacob Powning (foolishly let my Powning piece go years ago.) So far I'm 1 for 4 and a bit green with envy! I'm really excited for you!
Russ Ellis wrote:
Congratulations on the acquisition! There's four makers I want to acquire pieces from. Vince Evans (been very fortunate there) Peter Johhnson, Patrick Barta and Jacob Powning (foolishly let my Powning piece go years ago.) So far I'm 1 for 4 and a bit green with envy! I'm really excited for you!


Thanks Russ,

I've always had much the same list. I've owned a couple of Evan's and a Barta, wish I'd kept the Barta. I doubt I'll ever own a Powning, but I love his work. I'll have to make do with two Johnssons. :)
Go to page Previous  1, 2

Page 2 of 2

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum