Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Longswords on a Belt? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page Previous  1, 2 
Author Message
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Tue 21 Feb, 2017 10:37 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

If you decide on a baldric, KoA sells a 'Universal Baldric' that is fantastic. Very thick, black leather--good rivets--nice buckle--will fit anything. Has a lace up frog, but the lace is junk. I used a black shoe lace...perfect. Get one---cheap, and worth it. You'll see my review. Wink Big Grin ....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Mikko Kuusirati




Location: Finland
Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Reading list: 13 books

Posts: 1,080

PostPosted: Wed 22 Feb, 2017 11:09 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Harry Marinakis wrote:
I wouldn't doubt that longswords were transported on the back, but only for long transits. You can't draw a longsword from a back-mounted scabbard, and even if you could it would certainly entail a lot of wild gyrations.

Personally I think any historical references to swords being transported "over the back" or somesuch in a historical European context actually refer to them being carried in the hand braced over the shoulder - just like a long firearm, or a bindle stick, you know? Period art is full of Landesknechten carrying their two-handers in this way, for instance, but I've never seen a single period depiction of a sword scabbard actually worn on the back in any manner.

"And sin, young man, is when you treat people like things. Including yourself. That's what sin is."
— Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum
View user's profile Send private message
Neil Melville




Location: Scotland
Joined: 27 Oct 2009

Posts: 219

PostPosted: Thu 23 Feb, 2017 5:25 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Harry Marinakis wrote:
I wouldn't doubt that longswords were transported on the back, but only for long transits. You can't draw a longsword from a back-mounted scabbard, and even if you could it would certainly entail a lot of wild gyrations.


As Mikko says there are numerous illustrations of Swiss and German warriors carrying their two-hand swords sloped over the shoulder on the march. For long marches these swords were probably carried in baggage waggons until they were needed. There are refs to Scottish chieftains (or similar top warriors) having a 'boy' to carry the two-hand sword until the warrior went into battle. Don't believe film scenarios!
Neil

N Melville
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Sun 26 Feb, 2017 10:02 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Harry....I wouldn't say 'can't' draw a longsword from the back. From a full-length scabbard--no--impossible. From a back-sling baldric with a short demi-scabbard and hanging hooks--yes--you can. I occasionally carry a 55" claymore in one, and can over-shoulder draw it just as fast, if not faster, than a belted longsword in a full-length scabbard. I know...goin' back to Mel and Braveheart...but it works. Wink Big Grin ....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Mikko Kuusirati




Location: Finland
Joined: 16 Nov 2004
Reading list: 13 books

Posts: 1,080

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 1:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Mark Moore wrote:
Harry....I wouldn't say 'can't' draw a longsword from the back. From a full-length scabbard--no--impossible. From a back-sling baldric with a short demi-scabbard and hanging hooks--yes--you can. I occasionally carry a 55" claymore in one, and can over-shoulder draw it just as fast, if not faster, than a belted longsword in a full-length scabbard. I know...goin' back to Mel and Braveheart...but it works. Wink Big Grin ....McM

Sure, you demonstrably can build such a contraption and it'll more or less work (though still nowhere near as well as a belt scabbard, for almost all practical purposes).

However, given the modern pop culture obsession with wearing swords on one's back, I think we seriously need to be clear that no such thing was ever used in real life. The whole concept is just objectively inferior to all the real carry systems that actually were used back in the day when people used swords in earnest for warfare and self defense and not just to look cool on screen.

"And sin, young man, is when you treat people like things. Including yourself. That's what sin is."
— Terry Pratchett, Carpe Jugulum
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 5:59 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I never said anything about it being used *historically* in real life. I only said I use one. Am I not really alive? WTF?! Laughing Out Loud .....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Victor Lavenstein




Location: Rhode Island, U.S.A.
Joined: 03 Jan 2008

Posts: 7

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 9:30 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

From Bruegel's TRIUMPH OF DEATH. Three gentlemen in early 1500s garb (top left to bottom right diagonal) with longsword belt-suspensions. They appear to have worse things to worry about than inadvertently sweeping the crockery off the table... Surprised






Victor

"Always carry a firearm east of Aldgate, Watson."
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mark Moore




Location: East backwoods-assed Texas
Joined: 01 Oct 2003
Likes: 6 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Posts: 2,294

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 10:00 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well...my situation wasn't QUITE that bad! Laughing Out Loud ....McM
''Life is like a box of chocolates...'' --- F. Gump
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 12:51 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Also, in many towns you would not have been allowed to carry a weapon in any way.
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Richard Miller




Location: Santa Barbara
Joined: 16 Jun 2014
Likes: 26 pages

Posts: 88

PostPosted: Tue 28 Feb, 2017 6:11 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Victor Lavenstein wrote:
From Bruegel's TRIUMPH OF DEATH. Three gentlemen in early 1500s garb (top left to bottom right diagonal) with longsword belt-suspensions. They appear to have worse things to worry about than inadvertently sweeping the crockery off the table... Surprised






Victor


I don't know how accurately this depicts life in the day... Skeletons fight and women continue to play the lute... Maybe?
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Longswords on a Belt?
Page 2 of 2 Reply to topic
Go to page Previous  1, 2 All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum