Probably a late 17 th century Flemish piqueneer helmet
Hello,
I am new here and restarted a militaria collection since 10 years.
I would have had a very nice collesction of late medieval helmets if I had kept them all, but that is live...
Anyway, I was very thrilled when this helmet appeared, and it was a must have to me.
So here are the pictures and hoping you could tell me if I am right, by saying it is probably a late 17 th century Flemish piqueneer helmet.


 Attachment: 95.78 KB
cuirasse 002.JPG


 Attachment: 94.89 KB
cuirasse 003.JPG


 Attachment: 207.52 KB
piquen16.jpg


 Attachment: 201.58 KB
piquen15.jpg


 Attachment: 173 KB
piquen17.jpg


 Attachment: 187.21 KB
piquen18.jpg


 Attachment: 178.28 KB
piquen19.jpg

Looks pretty good to me. The square rivet plates on the brim look look ok to me
Thank you for your reply.
And regarding it being Flemish, do you think I am right.
I'd say Dutch to be honest. let me have a google
Any other opinions, please?
No one? :\
Replies
May I suggest this group on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Dutchrevolt/?fref=ts ?


They increasingly know their stuff and research very well .

I'd also say that this looks very much like an example in the Dutch army museum Catalogue reference 056251 dated 1630-1650.

and this

https://collections.royalarmouries.org/object/rac-object-31667.html
From my Dutch friends. The style is known as Stormhoed

Another example is here

http://www.grijpmaantiek.nl/collectie/histori...stormhoed/
Hey David, thanks again.
This is a great help.
Cheers
Due to your help I managed to find more info and didn't expect this; the helmet was originally found on a flea market near Paris, not by me sadly (!), but it came along with a breast plate.
From the beginning I didn't taught both belonged together until I found this, on;
http://www.vintageflyinghelmets.com/antiques-and-historical-items
I'll add the pic's later on, I am on a new laptop and having a hard time to adapt to the new systems.
Wow....Is it the angle of the photo, or do those tassets connected to that breastplate look really massive? They look huge!...McM
Hello,
they are big, but not disproportionate to me.

Anyway here is the brest plate that came along with the helmet.
Check out the small V shapped inlet in the middle, at the lower edge.
That construction looks very similar to the plate showed in the pic's above....what do you think?


 Attachment: 25.74 KB
cuirasse 004.JPG

Sorry, just noticed there was only a link, so here is the picture from that link.


 Attachment: 88.19 KB
pikeman 2 b.jpg

Could be from the same area and era. The breastplate in the first photos is heavily riveted. I'm wondering if some of them are more decorative than functional. Seems like an awful lot. :wtf: The breastplate in the above photo looks almost identical to the one I own. Mine is purely for costume-wear though. :) Judging from the large, round dent in the upper chest...looks like it might have taken a musket ball. :D .....McM
It did indeed take a musket ball, but for as far as I know this was done to test them.
Strange is that it sits on the opposite side it generally does....(left, and not right as you will see most)
The huge tassets aren't entirely out of place for the 17th century, but they look a little bigger than usual here. Maybe siege armour instead of normal pikeman's field armour?

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum