Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Hi Kevin

Thanks for posting - that is one superb looking sword.

Have you done any cutting with it and if so, how did it perform?

regards

mike
Mike O'Hara wrote:
Hi Kevin

Thanks for posting - that is one superb looking sword.

Have you done any cutting with it and if so, how did it perform?

regards

mike


Hi Mike,
No, I have not cut with it. I'm just a collector at this point, maybe someday I'll get into the performance end of the hobby. I love this sword though it feels great in my hand, but i'm no expert.
Re: My Irish blade display
Kevin P Molloy wrote:
My custom Irish Scian from A&A and my Kern from Albion. I'm not the best photagrapher so this is the best I can do for now.


Kevin

Nice looking Scian, do you have some specs? Length, blade length, blade width, weight etc?

What is the hilt made of on the original Scian you posted from Limerick city museum?
It doesn't look like wood and it appears to be fused.

Lastly do you know if Scian is the correct in period term for these knives?
I've also seen it spelt Skean and a few other ways as well.

Thanks

Danny
Re: My Irish blade display
scian, skeen skean, sgian, these are all phonetic spellings in english of the gaelic word for "knife"

you'll see many different spellings within period because you are looking at the English trying to mimic a gaelic word the way they heard it spoken by the Irish and Scots. Plus written English in the Tudor period wasn't the exact language it is today. There are multiple spellings for many words. Many times you will see documents where the same word is spelled several different ways in the same document. For example I recently saw the word "devil" in a 1602 manuscript spelled three different ways by the same author in the same paragraph! (devil, devill deville)

nice reproduction scian!


Last edited by Thom R. on Sun 30 Jan, 2011 8:44 am; edited 2 times in total
Re: My Irish blade display
Danny Grigg wrote:
Kevin P Molloy wrote:
My custom Irish Scian from A&A and my Kern from Albion. I'm not the best photagrapher so this is the best I can do for now.


Kevin

Nice looking Scian, do you have some specs? Length, blade length, blade width, weight etc?

What is the hilt made of on the original Scian you posted from Limerick city museum?
It doesn't look like wood and it appears to be fused.

Lastly do you know if Scian is the correct in period term for these knives?
I've also seen it spelt Skean and a few other ways as well.

Thanks

Danny


Thanks Danny, Its 24.75 overall with a 20 inch blade.


The hilt on the Limerick example is wood. Here is the exact description from the Limerick museum site;

Dagger, iron with wooden handle, C16-17, River Shannon at Corbally



Dagger, iron with wooden handle. Triangular single edge blade, the spine a low V cross section. The wooden handle is cylindrical, cut out along the central portion to form a three loop spiral ridge in false relief, a shallow groove along the spine of the ridge. The handle is strengthened at either end with an iron hoop, formerly flush with the surface of the handle. The area between the hoops and the spiral section are ornamented with motifs in false relief formed by cut out triangles and lozenges, a narrow ridge being formed to each side of the ornamented bands. The end of the handle is held in place by a sunken washer over the end of the tang, which is hammered. The wood around the washer is iron impregnated and may have had zig-zag ornament. Centre of gravity 15cm below handle. Conserved
.

As far as the spelling I defer to my irish friends on Irish Living history who say that the correct term in irish gaelic is scian.
This is from a post on page 2 of this thread from John Looney who runs the irish living history site;

Posted: Fri 24 Feb, 2006 1:41 pm Post subject: Help on irish stuff - at livinghistory.ie
Guys, an addendum, you can get a lot of extra Irish specific information at http://livinghistory.ie

On the "skean" thing, you might get more information if you spell it "scian", as that's the modern Irish (Gaelic) spelling (I think skean is scots-gaelic).

Check out http://livinghistory.ie/modules.php?name=Foru...ight=scian for instance - it's handy to have a board handy that has Irish archeologists available for questions!

John


Last edited by Kevin P Molloy on Sun 30 Jan, 2011 11:35 am; edited 1 time in total
yes right. scian is the correct modern spelling. but is used for just about any knife. my grandmother used it to refer to kitchen and table knives, more or less any knife. its not just a term for the long war knife.

I forgot but if you are digging through old documents "skeyne" is another very common spelling used in english within period for the long war knife. the term dirk dirke durk durke is also used in late 16th and 17th century by English writers as it is an old scots term for a dagger that the english picked up on. you will also occasionally see the word "flatchet" or "flatchett" or "flatchette" or "flached"used within period, but it is thought that flatchet referred more to a short, broader double edged blade used by many kern, somewhat like a katzbalger in size but with a very simple dagger like hilt. it is confusing at times though because sometimes these "flatchets" were described as having very simple hilts like the long war knives, so the terms can get mixed up by english writers for the two types of blades. despite multiple references to these flatchets, i don't know that we have any surviving examples in Ireland.
Re: My Irish blade display
Thom R. wrote:
scian, skeen skean, sgian, these are all phonetic spellings in english of the gaelic word for "knife"

you'll see many different spellings within period because you are looking at the English trying to mimic a gaelic word the way they heard it spoken by the Irish and Scots. Plus written English in the Tudor period wasn't the exact language it is today. There are multiple spellings for many words. Many times you will see documents where the same word is spelled several different ways in the same document. For example I recently saw the word "devil" in a 1602 manuscript spelled three different ways by the same author in the same paragraph! (devil, devill deville)

nice reproduction scian!


Thanks Thom,
I agree, I was going to write something similiar but decided to keep it simple, no argument from me :D
Recently we had a thread on the leine croich and how inaccurate it is to portray Irish and Scots in kilts for the medieval period. One other thing that I have been having trouble with lately though is the accuracy of many recently published illustrations showing kerne and gallowglass in leines with short sleeved (to the elbow) mail shirts (haubergeons) over them bearing two handed weapons (sparths, axes and longswords) with no forearm defence.



no forearm defence? really? how accurate can that be? bear with me a second..............

First my experience in longsword is that the number one place I get hit when fencing is my forearms, I would imagine that the same would hold true with polearms and a friend of mine who practices quarterstaff agrees.

Second, almost all of the depictions of Scots and Irish warriors within period seem to show some kind of forearm defence, certainly all effigies do, as well as a nearly all within period depictions



This usually takes the form of mail to the wrist, or the quilted cotun to the wrist, and in some cases (Butler at Jerpoint or the Glinsk effigy) splinted or gutter shaped steel vambraces on the forearms. Or it takes the form shown on the Ashmolean drawing, with an ionar which has full sleeves over the leine.

Finally, I just can not get my head around having the wealth to possess a helm and mail shirt and mail pisane collar and a leine made with yards and yards of saffron dyed material and some nice two handed weapons but not have the means to buy or own forearm defence. it just makes no sense to me whatsoever to go into battle dressed in that manner.

I am sorry to pick at little details, and certainly I am not trying to be a bother or a critic of certain authors and their recently published works, but I am concerned that this might be another one of those inaccurate memes that has gotten started and is currently gaining momentum.

Now having said all of that there is one depiction from 1521 by Durer of the Irishman with the two handed sword and bow who has a helm, mail haubergeon and mail collar but no forearm defence.


but as far as I know, its the only one that shows someone outfitted in that manner and the man to his left has a full sleeved cotun protecting his forearms. As much as I love that illustration I do wonder about how accurate that particular depiction is or how "typical" that would be.................. tr
Ever tried to shoot a bow in fully mailled sleeves? Or heavily quilted ones? That right there might be your answer.

See Derrick's images of Ireland for the equipment of the kerns. Durer was right on the mark, IMHO. We know he was quite accurate in most of his art, well except for the rhinoceros.... :p
good point. but my concern still is that the Durer drawing of the man with the bow has been extrapolated to "typical" or standard kit for armored kerne and gg in general........... that is fighters without bows bearing primarily two handed weapons. tr

ps. In general I am shying away from referencing or pointing people to Derricke's images of Ireland. Although I agree that it is a piece of history worth reviewing, personally I find them offensive propaganda and there are many inaccurate depictions in those drawings, starting with the ionars.
Hi Thom and Kel

I'd wondered about the half length sleeves as well but it seems that there were all sorts of variations - possibly due to the wealth of gallowglass or personal preference. The Osprey Galloglass 1250 - 1600 describes wrist length and elbow length maille and those who just wore cotun. The tomb effigies and illustrations from maps seem to bear out the mix. John Marsden's book seems to have similar variations.

My experience in WMA (I have a gallowglass kit that I train in) is similar to Thom's - exposed forearms get hit. I wear maille and plate gauntlets - there does seem to be some justification for the plate part anyway in some images.

To follow Kel's point re bows - a lot of the illustrations/representations I've seen of kern seem to suggest that they didn't wear much armor or wore jerkins

cheers

mike
Hi guys,

The pattern I used for my leine was from Reconstructing History, http://www.reconstructinghistory.com/products/rh304-mans-leine-1, and the one I used for my ionar, http://www.reconstructinghistory.com/products...n-outfit-1 . The leine ends at my elbow, even though it looks like it goes to the wrist in their drawing and the ionar covers the rest of my arm. I don't know how accurate the leine pattern is, since a lot of art work looks like the leine goes to the wrist. But I've also seen some leines where the sleeves go to the wrist, but the body ends at mid-thigh. So I'm not so sure how accurate any leine reproduction is. I'm also very interested in the length of leine sleeves.

When I practice, I wear leather vambraces since I get hit a lot there as well.

Zach
Hey guys, just wondering but does anyone here know where I could find a better quality image of the picture of an Irishman holding a dart by Hieronymus Tielssch posted by Bob Gresh on the first page of this topic.
Thom R. wrote:
you will also occasionally see the word "flatchet" or "flatchett" or "flatchette" or "flached"used within period, but it is thought that flatchet referred more to a short, broader double edged blade used by many kern, somewhat like a katzbalger in size but with a very simple dagger like hilt. it is confusing at times though because sometimes these "flatchets" were described as having very simple hilts like the long war knives, so the terms can get mixed up by english writers for the two types of blades. despite multiple references to these flatchets, i don't know that we have any surviving examples in Ireland.


Thom R. Could you (or anyone else) elaborate on this "fletchet". After reading through this great topic, I tried searching for references but unfortunately I've come up empty handed. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Jason
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Page 6 of 6

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum