1)

2)

3)

The red lines represent the rows of mail. Which of these methods will produce the best fit, durability and mobility? I would appreciate help from the pro and hobby armorers on the board.
Mart Shearer wrote: |
Method 2 most closely approximates medieval European practice, where the expansion is in the sleeve (or the sleeve contracts towards the elbow). This is joined with a 90 degree join. I have seen Method 3 in Indo-Persian mail.
Failure to expand over the shoulders and shoulder-blades also causes tension in the arm. The back should be wider than the front of the body so that the sleeves cant forward. These links provide plenty of useful images. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/trevor.barker/fa...tm#sect4-2 http://www.themailresearchsociety.erikds.com/pdf/tmrs_pdf_3.pdf http://forums.armourarchive.org/phpBB3/viewto...ail+sleeve |