Author |
Message |
Semih Koyuncu
Location: Turkiye Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 15
|
|
|
|
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional
Location: Jeffersonville USA Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 141
|
Posted: Sun 20 Apr, 2014 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have never seen anything like them either. The shape of the tillers (stocks) suggests the 19th century to me.
I will point some crossbow enthusiasts in this direction.
Mac
Robert MacPherson
http://www.lightlink.com/armory/
http://billyandcharlie.com/
|
|
|
|
Robert MacPherson
Industry Professional
Location: Jeffersonville USA Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Posts: 141
|
|
|
|
Jean Thibodeau
|
Posted: Wed 23 Apr, 2014 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes and some museum person assembled the prods on backwards, as mentioned by someone in the linked comment thread.
Does look very 19th century to me and mostly for some sort of sports target practice or maybe hunting ?
You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
|
|
|
|
Semih Koyuncu
Location: Turkiye Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 15
|
Posted: Thu 24 Apr, 2014 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Robert MacPherson,
Thanks so much for your effort. I am already following that forum and topic too.
Now, it seems they are dated to 19th century as few others suggested. Pictures are belong to someone from archer group in Facebook and according to he the bows are have no relation with tillers.Even though he tried to warn museum authorities about direction of bows, they complained about lack of enough space in glass case. Apparently, museum personnel just put some ordinary bows on stocks without knowing they did it in wrong way. So while thinking about crossbows the bows should be dismissed.
Thanks again for answers.
|
|
|
|
Lafayette C Curtis
|
Posted: Mon 28 Apr, 2014 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting nomenclature, since I've only heard "zamburak" being used for camel-mounted heavy muskets (or small swivel guns), although there's some interesting speculation that these weapons originated from earlier camel-mounted crossbows. I wonder if there's any etymological link with the Ottoman crossbows (which seem to be personal rather than crew-served weapons)?
(The closest I've found is an old dictionary entry: http://www.bibliomania.com/2/3/260/1293/20296/1/frameset.html )
|
|
|
|
Semih Koyuncu
Location: Turkiye Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 15
|
Posted: Tue 29 Apr, 2014 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
While talking about weapons terminology could be very confusing but it is not the case here. Taybugha Al-Ashrafi Al-Baklamishi Al-Yunani in his The Complete Manual of Archery for Cadets written in 1368 mentions "zanburak" as a heavy type of crossbow which throws heavy bolts. Also, an earlier source Ibn Bibi in his memoirs covering between the years 1192 and 1280, while writing about Saljuk history mentions both "zanburak" and a lighter version "carh". So it is quite understandable for Ottomans to use Turcified version, "zemberek" for crossbows. One startling point is that in modern Turkish crossbow is called "Tartar bow". Although I tried hard to find when first appeared this nomenclature but failed to find something satisfying. Yet, I think it is result of modern Turkish language revolution.
|
|
|
|
|