| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Daniel Sullivan, Anonymous, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
Antonio Ganarini
|
Posted: Thu 10 May, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject: Del Tin 5145: a not so famous, interesting sword... |
|
|
Hi to all!
looking around for interesting swords, I found a pretty pleasant one (at least for me ) that seems to be not so popular: the Del tin 5145 (see the link).
http://www.deltin.it/5145.htm
It should be an Oakeshott type XVII sword, but I could not find any review/comment/imformation online about it, beside those (really not so detailed...) from Del Tin.
Does anybody know something about its handling, fit&finish and, above all, its historical accuracy?
Attachment: 26.19 KB
Ciao a tutti!
|
|
|
|
JE Sarge
Industry Professional
|
Posted: Thu 10 May, 2012 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe it's based on XVII.2 in Records of the Medieval Sword. One of my WMA buddies has one, it's suprisingly nimble in the hand and a great sword to half-sword with. Though I don't care for the general aesthetics of the model, it's a solid piece with good fit and decent finish. Stats are similar, but I'd not call it an exacting replica - just as with Del Tin's other offerings.
J.E. Sarge
Crusader Monk Sword Scabbards and Customizations
www.crusadermonk.com
"But lack of documentation, especially for such early times, is not to be considered as evidence of non-existance." - Ewart Oakeshott
|
|
|
|
Antonio Ganarini
|
Posted: Fri 11 May, 2012 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Sarge!
It's what I hoped to hear!
I had in mind the same XVII.2, but I was not sure about dimensions, becouse I could not find the blade length of the Del Tin's version.
Ciao a tutti!
|
|
|
|
Bartek Strojek
|
Posted: Fri 11 May, 2012 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's nice looking, XVII have something to them, with that certain rawness....
Seems to be pretty damn hefty though, at 2200 g
Then again, Oakeshott mentions that a lot of XVII were exactly like that.
|
|
|
|
Antonio Ganarini
|
Posted: Fri 11 May, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bartek Strojek wrote: |
Seems to be pretty damn hefty though, at 2200 g
|
That's the part that most interests me! A nimble sword of about 2.2 kg is a bulldozer!
Ciao a tutti!
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|