Posts: 5,981 Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Wed 15 Sep, 2010 10:11 am
Welcome! The breast should not be hinged to the back, so that's not a problem. The problem, I think, is with the proportions and fit of components. Keep in mind that the piece should fit quite close and the waist should be at your natural waist. For a man of 6'1", that means a distance of about 14" from top of the breast to the navel, with the flange just below. This one looks much longer than that. Fauld should cover to hip joints. There seems to be something funny going on with the construction of the fauld, too. Overall, it aspires to be something like the one below, by Canadian armourer Francois L'Archeveque--historically accurate, beautiful and a pretty penny. If you want to support the Canadian economy and get an accurate harness, I'd encourage you to contact Francois for a custom-fit but simple single-piece breast with fauld, which he can do for about the same price as the piece you posted. At least, that's about the price he quoted me for breast and fauld (on the other hand, the currency exchange rate was more favorable at that time). Breast and helmet was a very common equipment combination in the period. You don't need a back and tassets to be historically accurate.
http://flarcheveque.com/Homeb.html
Attachment: 56.18 KB
