Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Ballock dagger? Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Zach Gordon




Location: Vermont. USA
Joined: 07 Oct 2008

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 252

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 2:48 pm    Post subject: Ballock dagger?         Reply with quote

Hi, y'all.
I have a question concerning "Ballock Daggers", and the shape of the hilt. I was going to buy one of these and I showed a picture to a friend of mine that is not into this kind of thing. He thought it would not be a good buy because the shape of the hilt reminded him of er.......male genitalia. After hearing that and looking at a couple of ballock daggers I couldn't help but agree.... And as these were worn on the belt near that region, I was wondering if they were specifically designed to look like you know what. Are there any historical documents, etc. that confirm or denounce this, um, theory?
Thnx
Z
http://www.myArmoury.com/images/reviews/mi_bd1_s.jpg
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 3:02 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The design is intentionally aimed at being a representation of the male anatomy.

Did you read our Spotlight article on the Ballock dagger? It's linked in your post, above.


Spotlight: The Ballock Dagger

An article by Jason Elrod

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Zach Gordon




Location: Vermont. USA
Joined: 07 Oct 2008

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 252

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 3:07 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks man! Sorry I had not seen that article.
Thnx,
Z
View user's profile Send private message
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 3:12 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Cool. One other thing worth mentioning is that the original photo you provided as a link is an example that is particularly "anatomic" in nature. Not only are the "lobes" present and quite defined, the grip and "pommel end" are also carved to represent the male anatomy.

In medieval culture, the phallic nature of imagery and art was not frowned upon, but was embraced and often flaunted. The ideas of shame and modesty were different than ours are today. They, of course, existed in their society, but they were not the same as modern notions.

Many ballock daggers are quite stylized, but like the one you show above, others are very lifelike. As our ballock dagger spotlight article mentions, the prudish Victorian culture renamed these daggers "kidney daggers" to deny the obvious phallic association.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Hector Mendoza





Joined: 14 Oct 2006

Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 4:14 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Quote:
The design is intentionally aimed at being a representation of the male anatomy.


Question is why?
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Nathan Robinson
myArmoury Admin


myArmoury Admin

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 4:18 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hector Mendoza wrote:
Question is why?


Did you read my post above?

Phallic imagery is found throughout recorded history as a sign of virility, masculinity, and other things.

.:. Visit my Collection Gallery :: View my Reading List :: View my Wish List :: See Pages I Like :: Find me on Facebook .:.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Andrew Maxwell




Location: New Zealand
Joined: 03 May 2009

Posts: 90

PostPosted: Mon 12 Oct, 2009 7:55 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Just a note for anyone else who didn't realise- "ballock" or "bollock" are (rather old) English slang terms for testicles. Big Grin
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Manning




Location: Austria
Joined: 23 Mar 2008

Posts: 894

PostPosted: Tue 13 Oct, 2009 6:50 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Hector Mendoza wrote:
Quote:
The design is intentionally aimed at being a representation of the male anatomy.


Question is why?

In the period when ballock daggers were popular, men would often wear a dagger at the front center of their belt. I'm sure medieval people made jokes about the long, hard, straight thing hanging between their legs, and some picked daggers which would add to the joke.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > Ballock dagger?
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum