Author |
Message |
Tony G.
|
Posted: Thu 19 Feb, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: Medieval dagger blade. Date ???? |
|
|
OK All,
can any body give me a rough date on a dagger blade, 13 inches long with hollow ground blade. When did this type of blade first appear.
Many thanks Tony...
Attachment: 147.4 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 135.3 KB
[ Download ]
|
|
|
|
D. Austin
Industry Professional
Location: Melbourne, Australia Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 208
|
Posted: Thu 19 Feb, 2009 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At a guess, I'd say that that's a spear head. I could well be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
Allan Senefelder
Industry Professional
|
|
|
|
Leo Todeschini
Industry Professional
|
|
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
D. Austin wrote: | At a guess, I'd say that that's a spear head. I could well be wrong though. |
I'm also leaning towards a spear/javelin head. The strong rib & acute point suggests it is an armor piercer, maybe an Irish dart. Dating? Hard to say, times of the chainmail probably.
Curator of Beit Ussishkin, regional nature & history museum, Upper Galilee.
|
|
|
|
Julien M
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
"It could by a spear head, but most were socketed and not tanged so I lean toward knife"
That sums it all for me. I can't recall any example of tanged spear head either and fitting that at the end of a pole woudn't make much sense to me. The blade seems wider than most rondels I've seen in museum but variations such as these were common after all.
J
|
|
|
|
Bjorn Hagstrom
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is there any sort of context to these items that could be helpful?
Where they come from, or where and how they have appeared and so on?
There is nothing quite as sad as a one man conga-line...
|
|
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tanged spear heads were quite common in the middle east during the bronze age. The end of the tang used to be bent in 90 degrees to prevent an accidental remove of the head after it had been lashed to a split-end wooden shaft.
This item is clearly iron so probably of later age and possibly different location. Middle ages arrow heads from Israel were both socketed and tanged (dug by their thousands at excavations of crusader sites), some of them show resemblance to this particular head but much smaller of course.
Curator of Beit Ussishkin, regional nature & history museum, Upper Galilee.
|
|
|
|
Bruno Giordan
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel wrote: | Tanged spear heads were quite common in the middle east during the bronze age. The end of the tang used to be bent in 90 degrees to prevent an accidental remove of the head after it had been lashed to a split-end wooden shaft.
This item is clearly iron so probably of later age and possibly different location. Middle ages arrow heads from Israel were both socketed and tanged (dug by their thousands at excavations of crusader sites), some of them show resemblance to this particular head but much smaller of course. |
Moslem or European artifacts? Interesting. [/b]
|
|
|
|
Bruno Giordan
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me too it is a spear head. The wing is too flat to be a dagger's edge.
There is however a small bevel the the beginning of the rib where an hilt's cavity could sit, however the profile of the wings is flat, not hollow ground.
|
|
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Recent studies have led to a conclusion that during the crusades both sides used all types of arrow heads. There was no "national" kind of arrow head.
Curator of Beit Ussishkin, regional nature & history museum, Upper Galilee.
|
|
|
|
Daniel Sullivan
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Believe it to be a spear. Agree with Bruno, the area for fitting the hilt is the major clue.
Dan
|
|
|
|
Josh Watson
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
The sharply angled shoulders on this piece would be a poor design choice for a spear, and I see no means of securing the head to the shaft. Looks more like a dagger for piercing maille to me.
The first step to becoming wise is to know that you know nothing.
|
|
|
|
Tony G.
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Many thanks for your views but I definately think this a dagger blade circa 1500 and not a spearhead.
Tony...
|
|
|
|
Bruno Giordan
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel wrote: | Recent studies have led to a conclusion that during the crusades both sides used all types of arrow heads. There was no "national" kind of arrow head. |
In Europe socketed arrow heads should be the norm.
So there is evidence they used local products?
More than national I would obviously say culture related. Modern nations weren't born yet.
|
|
|
|
M. Eversberg II
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm going with dagger. Might be of a bollock type, where the hilt would fit over the shoulders.
M.
This space for rent or lease.
|
|
|
|
Sean Flynt
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some 18th c. spontoon heads were tanged rather than socketed, with a ferrule around the end of the haft to prevent splitting and possibly a rivet through haft and tang. But IIRC those heads tended to be made on the cheap from flat stock rather than elaborately formed like this. Consider, also, the shape of this 15th c. head:
Note how in this and the piece in question the rib tapers out into a long point of square section. The pieces are about the same size, too. Also note that the tang of the posted weapon is not peened. I think it's a variety of spear.
Attachment: 90.98 KB
-Sean
Author of the Little Hammer novel
https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1
|
|
|
|
Randall Moffett
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Until we know where it was from the answer is going to be hard. Tanged spears or arrows are fairly uncommon in western europe. Until we know where it is from though regionalisms are of little help though. You do see in the late medieval period daggers with such blades. They could be grouped often into the ever unhelpful baselard class in English period texts. Looks like a german dagger from the 15th I saw not long ago on an auction site online. Sadly I did not get pictures of it.
RPM
|
|
|
|
Sa'ar Nudel
|
Posted: Fri 20 Feb, 2009 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruno Giordan wrote: | Sa'ar Nudel wrote: | Recent studies have led to a conclusion that during the crusades both sides used all types of arrow heads. There was no "national" kind of arrow head. |
In Europe socketed arrow heads should be the norm.
So there is evidence they used local products?
More than national I would obviously say culture related. Modern nations weren't born yet. |
I was speaking metaphorically. The crusader period has a well established time line, from 1099 to 1291 with the Horns of Hattin battle (1187) as a landmark between the early period and the late period. The invading Franks of the 1st crusade were not all homogenous, and they have become more and more mixed as time went by. Islamic forces were even more mixed with different ethnic cultures - arabs, seljuks, turkomans, kurds, azars, eastern christians. With time, there was a great deal of interaction between the two powers, especially during peace times and they took benefit of every thing that was handy.
An MA thesis was submitted on the topic of arrow heads and ethnicity, using the time capsule of Vadum Iacob as case study. Thousands of arrow heads were found on the site and statistic methods were put to use. Final conclusion was there is no kind of cultural/ethnic kind of arrow head, at least according to that particular time & place. Every archer on both side just used every arrow he could take - tanged, socketed, blunt, kite-shaped, barbed, bodkin.
Curator of Beit Ussishkin, regional nature & history museum, Upper Galilee.
|
|
|
|
|