| myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term. Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors) |
Author |
Message |
L. Bailey
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 9:40 am Post subject: Appropriate Longsword Width? |
|
|
I appologize if this has been mentioned before, I searched and found nothing.
I am looking at the 1501 Longsword here: http://www.leesarmoury.com/ds1501.htm
However, I am a bit irked at the blade length at the crossguard, as it reads one inch. Isnt this a tad thin for a blade that reaches 36 inches?
Would I be better off looking at the other longswords, which have a crossguard width of one and a half inch? I like this one more because I love fullers, but would be willing to switch if the blade is truly too thin.
|
|
|
|
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think that one inch listing is incorrect. Looking at the listed width of the guard and its proportion to the listed width of the blade, I'd guess the blade is more like 1.5 inches wide.
However, something with a thick blade, like an estoc, could be as little as an inch wide or even less.
ChadA
http://chadarnow.com/
|
|
|
|
L. Bailey
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I'll shoot Lee an email. Twould be nice if the blade was thick, I heard that some of the other early Atrims on the sight were a tad blade-thin.
|
|
|
|
James R.Fox
Location: Youngstowm,Ohio Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Posts: 253
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just a dumb thought but the Longsword looks like an Oakshott Type XIX to me. Check the ricasso, and remember what the master said about swords not being totally classifiable because both the bladesmith and the knight who used it had their own ideas about what constituted a proper blade.Even modern re-creations have this, although I agree the only longswords with narrow blades I can think of are either estocs or type XVII's
Ja68ms
|
|
|
|
Allen Andrews
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
By all means drop Lee a line, but I have an Atrim from this same era (albeit a different model) and the blade is 1.5 inches wide at the guard.
" I would not snare even an orc with a falsehood. "
Faramir son of Denethor
Words to live by. (Yes, I know he's not a real person)
|
|
|
|
Angus Trim
|
Posted: Sat 01 Mar, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its been 7 years since I made a lot of the stuff on Lee's site. But I can tell you that the thinnest width blade I made for a longsword was just a bit under 1.5 inches. 1 inch has to be a misprint...........
swords are fun
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum
|