Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search


myArmoury.com is now completely member-supported. Please contribute to our efforts with a donation. Your donations will go towards updating our site, modernizing it, and keeping it viable long-term.
Last 10 Donors: Anonymous, Daniel Sullivan, Chad Arnow, Jonathan Dean, M. Oroszlany, Sam Arwas, Barry C. Hutchins, Dan Kary, Oskar Gessler, Dave Tonge (View All Donors)

Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > What was the traditional Manufacturing Method for ... Reply to topic
This is a standard topic  
Author Message
Chris Arrington





Joined: 06 Apr 2007

Posts: 115

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 12:47 pm    Post subject: What was the traditional Manufacturing Method for ...         Reply with quote

What was the traditional Manufacturing method for creating the slot or opening in the cross guard thru which the tang of the blade passed.

My understanding is that most cross guards were cast in iron, steel, or brass and then worked by hand to the desired shape. So how was the opening/slot created? Obviously I can imagine it with modern tools and computer controlled machining techniques but how did a traditional smith do it?
View user's profile Send private message
Sean Flynt




Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Likes: 10 pages
Reading list: 13 books

Spotlight topics: 7
Posts: 5,981

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 1:25 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Guards/crosses and pommels were forged and filed rather than cast, with the center pierced and spread while the piece was red hot. No reason they couldn't be drilled and filed cold, though I'm not sure what the advantage of that would be.
-Sean

Author of the Little Hammer novel

https://www.amazon.com/Little-Hammer-Sean-Flynt/dp/B08XN7HZ82/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=little+hammer+book&qid=1627482034&sr=8-1


Last edited by Sean Flynt on Wed 19 Dec, 2007 1:37 pm; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gary A. Chelette




Location: Houston, Texas
Joined: 29 May 2007
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 337

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 1:26 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I would think much like they would an ax.
Make a small hole and insert a oblong piece to make it bigger and to the shape they want.
But I think casting is more likely. bronze or Iron can be cast with just a bit of clean up for a finished product.
I'm no sword maker and I've only made one rondel dagger, so I am just guessing.

Are you scared, Connor?
No, Cousin Dugal. I'm not!
Don't talk nonsense, man. I peed my kilt the first time I went into battle.
Oh, aye. Angus pees his kilt all the time!
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Gary A. Chelette




Location: Houston, Texas
Joined: 29 May 2007
Reading list: 2 books

Posts: 337

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 1:30 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Sean Flynt wrote:
Guards/crosses and pommels were forged and filed rather than cast, with the center pierced and spread while the piece was red hot. No reason they couldn't be drilled and filed cold, though.


Thanks Sean,
I wasn't real sure on my answer and your post hit 3 seconds before mine.

Are you scared, Connor?
No, Cousin Dugal. I'm not!
Don't talk nonsense, man. I peed my kilt the first time I went into battle.
Oh, aye. Angus pees his kilt all the time!
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Rob Miller
Industry Professional



Location: scotland
Joined: 26 Nov 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 2:13 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

The hot iron is punched through with a tool made for the job,then the iron is drawn out to the desired shape,the punch can be used again later in the job to cleanly open the hole for the tang to pass through,this can then be filed to fit when cool


 Attachment: 49.31 KB
progress3.11.jpg


 Attachment: 78.36 KB
progress4.11.jpg

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Justin King
Industry Professional



Location: flagstaff,arizona
Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Reading list: 20 books

Posts: 551

PostPosted: Wed 19 Dec, 2007 6:26 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

This beats drilling and filing by a LONG shot-minus heating time this can be done in a few minutes. Plus you keep the mass in the center and so can start with a smaller bar. Forging still has it's uses, nothing can do this faster short of a mill or a press.
View user's profile Send private message
Chris Arrington





Joined: 06 Apr 2007

Posts: 115

PostPosted: Thu 20 Dec, 2007 5:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thanks Guys ! Especially for the pictures.

I figured that method might be the case, but I wasn't sure.

I have a large piece (about 2' x 3' and somewhere between 3/8" and 1/2" thick) of mild steel that a friend gave me from a farm sale, and I was wondering about its suitability for cross guards.
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Miller
Industry Professional



Location: scotland
Joined: 26 Nov 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Thu 20 Dec, 2007 9:58 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

yes,the drift will widen the central portion of the bar,maybe adding 1/4",so if you want a fairly thin grip that would be fine i would think.I use a piece of tool steel,hardened and tempered,cut to the rough tang shape and slightly sharpened at the tip,to cut into the hot steel,the shoulders also provide a recess for the blade,so these can likewise be shaped to suit.The example here is for a type XX guard.the centre swells out a bit with the punching,this is cleaned up and filed eventually.


 Attachment: 79.99 KB
[ Download ]
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Otto Karl




Location: Ulm, Germany
Joined: 05 Dec 2007

Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sat 22 Dec, 2007 11:20 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I donīt realy think about Guards were made from Cast Iron: they were suppoused to bear forceful blows, even if the Weapon was a "light" one, as a Rapier or a Smallsword; Cast Iron is strong but very britle. On the other hand, I think the best way to attach the guards is the exposed by the scotsman (sorry, I really don`t remenber his name), because there are specialized but simple Tools designed for that kind of Works.
View user's profile Send private message ICQ Number
Jean Thibodeau




Location: Montreal,Quebec,Canada
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Likes: 50 pages
Reading list: 1 book

Spotlight topics: 5
Posts: 8,310

PostPosted: Sat 22 Dec, 2007 6:27 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Otto Karl wrote:
I donīt realy think about Guards were made from Cast Iron: they were suppoused to bear forceful blows, even if the Weapon was a "light" one, as a Rapier or a Smallsword; Cast Iron is strong but very britle. On the other hand, I think the best way to attach the guards is the exposed by the scotsman (sorry, I really don`t remenber his name), because there are specialized but simple Tools designed for that kind of Works.


Cast Iron is brittle and has a very very high carbon content that can make it feel almost oily ( graphite like lubrication maybe ).
If I remember correctly it also crumbles in a granular way when machined. ( machine shop courses decades ago ).

The guard made by casting in modern swords by makers like Albion or A & A is a form of cast steel and the carbon content is much lower like mild steel and not brittle and although cast, is not " cast iron ".

I do think that forged guards might be theoretically better but for large production runs castings, if of reasonably good quality, are a cost savings for the makers and make the swords less costly for the buyers.

You can easily give up your freedom. You have to fight hard to get it back!
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Miller
Industry Professional



Location: scotland
Joined: 26 Nov 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 149

PostPosted: Sun 23 Dec, 2007 5:40 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Thats true Jean,
the 'Traditional' method is as outlined,but for production purposes casting is the obvious solution.If one were to want to create a blade using traditional techniques exclusively then casting is not an option.
I have made many forged crossguards,but now use casting on the majority of my pieces for uniformity.I also found that when forging iron to make a guard there were very often a lot of visible strands in the iron,some customers did not like this finish,being used to production pieces,so i have stopped using iron for that reason,which is a shame since it is very good to forge,and also not prone to rusting in the same way as mild steel.If i forge a cross now i use either mild steel or spring steel,which i anneal to file,and that is also very tough.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Justin King
Industry Professional



Location: flagstaff,arizona
Joined: 12 Apr 2004
Reading list: 20 books

Posts: 551

PostPosted: Sun 23 Dec, 2007 7:24 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Rob Miller wrote:
Thats true Jean,

I have made many forged crossguards,but now use casting on the majority of my pieces for uniformity.I also found that when forging iron to make a guard there were very often a lot of visible strands in the iron,some customers did not like this finish,being used to production pieces,so i have stopped using iron for that reason,which is a shame since it is very good to forge,and also not prone to rusting in the same way as mild steel.If i forge a cross now i use either mild steel or spring steel,which i anneal to file,and that is also very tough.


I find this ironic, some smiths on this side of the pond will pay several times the going rate of steel to buy wrought iron. I'm sure the mainstream still sees these things with a modern eye but more and more I see a preference for authentic materials among sword collectors, as long as it dosen't sacrifice performance or useability (which is another modern irony since historical swords were used in much more earnest than modern repros, and I secretly suspect that most of us would cringe to see our beloved swords put to work for real by a man intent on killing an opponent).
View user's profile Send private message
Bruno Giordan





Joined: 28 Sep 2005

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 919

PostPosted: Sun 23 Dec, 2007 10:45 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Justin King wrote:
Rob Miller wrote:
Thats true Jean,

I have made many forged crossguards,but now use casting on the majority of my pieces for uniformity.I also found that when forging iron to make a guard there were very often a lot of visible strands in the iron,some customers did not like this finish,being used to production pieces,so i have stopped using iron for that reason,which is a shame since it is very good to forge,and also not prone to rusting in the same way as mild steel.If i forge a cross now i use either mild steel or spring steel,which i anneal to file,and that is also very tough.


I find this ironic, some smiths on this side of the pond will pay several times the going rate of steel to buy wrought iron. I'm sure the mainstream still sees these things with a modern eye but more and more I see a preference for authentic materials among sword collectors, as long as it dosen't sacrifice performance or useability (which is another modern irony since historical swords were used in much more earnest than modern repros, and I secretly suspect that most of us would cringe to see our beloved swords put to work for real by a man intent on killing an opponent).


the only solution is to reforge old items, e.g. old nails coming from the demolition of old farms.

Here in my region in Italy there are a lot of farms being restructured (badly) old bemas, often one undreed or more years old are removed, and many carry old nails made of cast iron.

Old gratings from the same environment could be employed.

To avoid destruction of old artifacts one could resort to new wrought iron, iron ore is abundant in my valleys but it would be very costly to set up an iron refinery as in old times there were many but running costs were farl lower than today.
View user's profile Send private message


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Historical Arms Talk > What was the traditional Manufacturing Method for ...
Page 1 of 1 Reply to topic
All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum