[Douglas Huxtable]

Hi,
I hope someone can give me some general info on who to get a sword from, what type it should be and how cheap it can be!
We are starting to re-enact and need a sword for live steel the group are fairly picky about how authentic things are but..... as long as it is shaped like a 15th century sword, Im sure there will be no quarell!
Obviously we are looking for a novice sword, therefore hopefully cheap, although we do respect that this is often not possible.
Can anyone give some ideas/introduce us to some makers websites where we can find trusty re-enactors swords from the 15th century!
Were generally looking for a one handed sword or a hand and a half, if we can afford it. (My son.)

Thanks

[Chad Arnow]

Please take some time to check out our extensive Reviews section (the most extensive on the web). There are reviews of products by many makers there with statistics and high quality pictures.

[Luka Borscak]

Hanwei practical hand and a half isn't expensive and it's quite good for the money. I think it's about 110-120 USD.

[Chuck Russell]

if they are picky then the words cheap will not be in your vocabulary. i have a Lutel that fit the bill for my first 15thc sword for a blunt.

what is teh required thickness for the edge of the blade? 2 mm or less? if it is less you could use a del tin, they dont come sharpened.

[Elling Polden]

For pure durability and performance, a thin bladed Armour Class is probably the best of-the-shelf option;
http://www.armourclass.co.uk/Data/Pages/Medieval_Main2.htm

3,8-1,9 cm blade is a must, since the blades have the same fuller width regardless of actual blade width.
Not to pretty, but reasonably light, and virtually indestructible.

[Van de Laak]

http://www.kultofathena.com/product~item~5007...+Sword.htm

I ordered this one by Kult of Athena, great folks, fast shipping. Nice sword for the money, comes with a sheath but the sheath is nothing special. The sword itself is fine, nice ricasso too.

[Douglas Huxtable]

Thanks for the feedback everyone, sorry it took so long to reply, have been rifling through reviews etc. thanks for everyones input, it will definately help in my quest to find a sword haha.

[James Barker]

[Van de Laak]

May I know why? Thanks.

[Robin Smith]

[Van de Laak]

Thank you for the info. I personally use it only for solo practise, so therefore I didn't gave any thought regarding the edge thickness or point sharpness etc. My apologies for suggesting this sword for re-enactment purposes.

[James Barker]

It is more than the edge; in fact we use Del Tin blades so the edge is not an issue it is the finish of the sword. We do not use anything with nickel plated cross guards or pommels, which this looks to have like many other inexpensive blades do. Also the shape of the pommel and that odd circular piece between the handle and pommel (might be part of the pommel) are not really historical.

On top of that if the handle is suede like the other sword from this company it is not a historical finish to the handle. Modern suede is not the same as suede used in the late Middle Ages or Renaissance anyway; when you see something like shoes or clothing referred too as suede from that time period that means the split side of the leather is outside and the smooth side of a hide is inside.

Granted we hold high standards but I think just about anyone using the title living history for their group is going to reject a sword with such flawed design; as I said double check with the group you are joining before buying.

[Chad Arnow]

[Van de Laak]

Indeed, its just simple black leather, nothing special... can always replace it with wire for example. Actually the crossguard and pommel are stainless steel, (not the blade of course), not nickel plated. Circular ring? Perhaps you are referring to another sword?

Anyway, I only use it for solo practise, don't really mind if its exactly 100 % historically correct. (at least when only paying USD170 or so) But I appreciate your comments nonetheless. Thanks.

Again this is the sword:

http://www.reliks.com/merchant.ihtml?pid=2020

[James Barker]

Van

Just so you know stainless steel would be out for us also. This is the ring I mean:



Never seen anything like it on a historical example.

[Douglas Huxtable]

Thanks everyone for all the comments and what not, thanks for the info james, although I dont think that circular piece you were talking about would be a problem with the MSS (Medieval seige society) they would probarbly just say, dont leave it on display outside your tent, just use it for re-enactment where you are not under so many eagle eyes and close scrutinys from very accurate historians etc.
Although, blade thickness may be a problem so I take your point on that and its definately something I will have to look into.

thanks again

[Frances Perry]

[Sean Flynt]

You could remove that flange quit easily with a hacksaw.

[Douglas Huxtable]

Thanks frances and sean, I will definately look into the market, we saw phil at the last re-enactment we went to, which was herstmonceux this year.
Ill keep my eyes open and thankyou for the feedback.

[Douglas Huxtable]

I was browsing the WWW and found this; http://www.theknightshop.co.uk/catalog/practi...8fb54f2ccd its not correct to the period, but looks very similar to this; http://therionarms.com/reenact/therionarms_c481.html which I think is, is this 15th cent.?

thanks