Posts: 420 Location: NY, NY
Sat 06 Oct, 2007 1:35 pm
Hello Robert, and welcome to myArmoury!
That looks like a fine traditional
wakizashi you have there, and not a WWII
showa-to or
gunto. Blades and fittings are related but distinct fields of study, and fittings and mounts can change over time, so they don't necessarily say much about the blade. In this case both the fittings and the blade look to be of good quality and either could potentially paper (i.e., win official papers of authenticity and quality from the NBTHK or NTHK expert panels).
From what I can see in the photo, everything looks to be in OK (not great, but probably not permanently messed up) condition for a WWII bringback kept by a non-collector. The very first thing I would urge you to do is to check out Dr. Stein's excellent
Japanese Sword Guide; especially the
Japanese Sword Care section, which will keep you from irrevocably ruining anything accidentally (Rule #1: do not touch the blade, not with
polishing materials, nor your fingers). Do browse through the rest of the site, including the
FAQ and
Basic Visual Glossary.
I have written a brief guide to some of the basic English-language books on this subject, which you can read here:
The Paper Armoury: Japanese Swords. You are welcome to check that out if you are interested in learning more about the subject in general.
As to specific help with your sword, the best place on the internet for this is the
Nihonto Message Board. Many of the collectors there are far more knowledgeable that I am and if you supply them with more detail photos of the blade, the
nakago (tang), the
kissaki (point), the fittings, etc., will probably be able to give you a very good idea (possibly an exact statement) of when and by whom your sword was made. They will also be able to give you great advice on professional restoration and official authentication by real flesh-and-blood experts, if either seems necessary.
For my own part, I can tell you that it's a genuine and traditionally-made
shobu-zukuri wakizashi in near-complete mountings - the
kozuka and
kurigata seem to be missing. The
nakago (tang) seems to be unaltered, which is good, and the fittings and
tsuka (handle) appear to be nice. I especially want to see close-ups of the
fuchi and
kashira, the oval collar and cap on the handle with the scrollwork, because they look very typical of
guri-bori designs.
Guri-bori is a technique of fastidiously layering different colored alloys, and then carving through them to produce a striped appearance. It's not especially common and it can be quite attractive.
I hope this helps you, and I look forward to seeing and hearing more of this particular sword. Congrats on a great find!
Cheers,
-Gabriel L.