Info Favorites Register Log in
myArmoury.com Discussion Forums

Forum index Memberlist Usergroups Spotlight Topics Search
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Swords You'd Take Into Battle Reply to topic
This is a standard topic Go to page 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11  Next 
Author Message
Timothy Gulics




Location: NJ, US
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 353

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 6:28 pm    Post subject: Swords You'd Take Into Battle         Reply with quote

Hello gentlemen (and ladies!).

This promises to be a fun topic... I'm hopeful it will get a lot of reads and replies. Here goes:

What sword would you take into battle?

Consider this scenario. The world as we know it is post-apocalypse. Perhaps a nuclear catastrophe has left the continents a burning wasteland ala Mad Max, or an unknown virus has reanimated the dead into killing machines along the lines of Night/Dawn/Day of the Dead. Whatever the case may be, you have suddenly been thrust into a cutthroat survival-of-the-fittest situation and you must travel the lands fending off brigands and thieves. Firearms reign, but only if you have ammunition. Edged weapons are necessary for survival. What sword would you pick?

Basically, this can be broken down into two questions:

1. What sword from any current maker would you want to have at your side? (you can also be generic and say "any blade from _______" and list the maker).

2. What one sword from your own collection would you trust your life to?

You can pick another edged weapon besides a sword, although my primary focus here is to see what everyone thinks is the best sword for actual full-on combat. This isn't tamagishiri - you're going against other sword-wielding and possibly armored individuals. A good cutter may not hold up... or it might kick butt. It's your opinion!

I'm eager to see your responses. Happy
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Gary Grzybek




Location: Stillwater N.J.
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 559

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 7:03 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Not that I have it yet but, my Albion Next Gen Viceroy would be my first choice. I think it would be logical in a sense that if I have to deal with unknown defenses it would be best to have a weapon that could cut as well as thrust.

Two men enter, one man leaves Big Grin

Gary Grzybek
ARMA Northern N.J.
www.armastudy.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Douglas Peters




Location: Baton Rouge,LA
Joined: 17 Nov 2003

Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 7:43 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Aye I'd have to agree with Gary about about the Viceroy. It just seems like a great cutter, and yet it looks to be nice and rigid for the thrust. Maybe, just maybe I'd go with some kind of basket hilt broad/backsword. Course I don't have any of the above...yet. So out of my Paul Chen ppk and my Atrim Seneschal, I'd go with my Atrim.
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Kelly




Location: Wichita, Kansas
Joined: 17 Aug 2003
Reading list: 42 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 5,739

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 8:22 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well, since I have plenty of firearms and ammunition I think I could have just about any sword I wanted. Big Grin
"In valor there is hope.".................. Tacitus
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Joe Fults




Location: Midwest
Joined: 02 Sep 2003

Posts: 3,646

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 8:32 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

I think it is important to go with what you kow and not take a wild guess that there is something better in this hypothetical scenario. So at least for now I will take my A&A GBS. I trust it not to fail, it will stand up to armor if armor is about, and is the only sword I have right now (at least for a few more days). Eek!
"The goal shouldn’t be to avoid being evil; it should be to actively do good." - Danah Boyd
View user's profile Send private message
Alexi Goranov
myArmoury Alumni


myArmoury Alumni

Location: San Francisco, CA
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
Reading list: 72 books

Spotlight topics: 2
Posts: 1,191

PostPosted: Fri 26 Mar, 2004 9:58 pm    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Gary Gzubeck wrote:

Not that I have it yet but, my Albion Next Gen Viceroy would be my first choice. I think it would be logical in a sense that if I have to deal with unknown defenses it would be best to have a weapon that could cut as well as thrust.

Two men enter, one man leaves


Hmmmm, lets seee. Cut well...thrust..deal witl all kinds of armor. How abot a A&A pole axe? I know its not a sword but hey, got to compromize Cool

Alexi
View user's profile Send private message
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 12:18 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick Kelly wrote:
Well, since I have plenty of firearms and ammunition I think I could have just about any sword I wanted. Big Grin


Laughing Out Loud You have answered the riddle correctly, Patrick. The answer is, "guns beat knives."

My personal choice is an M-14 with a few thousand rounds. The more the better.

Brian M
View user's profile Send private message
Douglas Peters




Location: Baton Rouge,LA
Joined: 17 Nov 2003

Posts: 25

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 1:03 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Yeah first thing I'd do is go find/loot myself a new gun and some ammo. I'm sure in a post apocolyptic world I'd be seriously underpowered with no more than a S&W .38 and Ruger 10/22. Course when I first saw this I started wondering if there would be any way to make more modern ammo with a limited power source or none, or would it revert back to maybe black-powder weapons?
View user's profile Send private message
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 1:20 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Well, in that case you could get yourself any firearm you wanted with a .22 and some patience.

About reverting to more primitive firearms, specifically blackpowder/lead ball.....
The oldest smokeless powder loads date back to the 1890s or so. These 115-year old (at most) cartridges can still be fired today. You might or might not get some misfires. I personally have fired 90-year old smokeless ammo without misfires. So, it might be a while before modern ammo goes "bad." Of course, if you didn't have a stockpile, you might have to revert to manufactuing black powder and molding lead bullets. Well, it is possible to make smokeless powder even with fairly primitive resources, if you know how.
View user's profile Send private message
Markus Haider




Location: Austria, Europe
Joined: 22 Aug 2003

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 132

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 2:46 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

My first choice too would be of course a gun, a rifle and a lot of ammunition.

All of my swords I currently own are well enough to trust my life to them, but my Atrim would be the one I would choose first. A long single-hand sword, with enough room on the pommel to use it with two hands too, a cut and thrust XVIII-blade, light and easy to carry around. The second choice would be my Clontarf, only because it is "only" a cutting sword, and not as flexible because of this.

If I could choose one sword of any maker, it would come down to the Regent, the not-yet-shown XIX-Bastard sword by Albion and a Schiavona by Patrick Bartà.


Last edited by Markus Haider on Sat 27 Mar, 2004 2:48 am; edited 2 times in total
View user's profile Send private message
Steve Fabert





Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Likes: 10 pages

Posts: 493

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 2:47 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick Kelly wrote:
Well, since I have plenty of firearms and ammunition I think I could have just about any sword I wanted. :D


Agreed. Which is why my own interest in historical sword types ends with the arrival of firearms on the European battlefield. Swords only make sense when nobody brings a gun to the knife fight. Likewise for full body armor.
View user's profile Send private message
Kenneth Enroth




Location: Finland
Joined: 04 Dec 2003

Posts: 288

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 3:17 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

How long did it take for guns to become the primary weapon after they were invented? My understanding is that the first guns were quite ineffective. I remember seeing a pic of a suit of armor with a dent on the breastplate supposedly caused by a bullet.
View user's profile Send private message
Gary Grzybek




Location: Stillwater N.J.
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 559

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 3:32 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Patrick Kelly wrote:
Well, since I have plenty of firearms and ammunition I think I could have just about any sword I wanted. Big Grin


Gee Patrick, your taking all the fun out of this thread. Big Grin

Of course a gun would be more logical but the subject seems to be about edged weapons. Worried

Gary Grzybek
ARMA Northern N.J.
www.armastudy.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gary Grzybek




Location: Stillwater N.J.
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 559

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 3:34 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Alexi Goranov wrote:
Gary Gzubeck wrote:

Not that I have it yet but, my Albion Next Gen Viceroy would be my first choice. I think it would be logical in a sense that if I have to deal with unknown defenses it would be best to have a weapon that could cut as well as thrust.

Two men enter, one man leaves


Hmmmm, lets seee. Cut well...thrust..deal witl all kinds of armor. How abot a A&A pole axe? I know its not a sword but hey, got to compromize Cool

Alexi


A good pole arm would be a wise choice too. Okay then, the Viceroy would be my back up Big Grin

Gary Grzybek
ARMA Northern N.J.
www.armastudy.org
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Steve Fabert





Joined: 03 Mar 2004
Likes: 10 pages

Posts: 493

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 4:25 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Kenneth Enroth wrote:
I remember seeing a pic of a suit of armor with a dent on the breastplate supposedly caused by a bullet.


Once firearms became common armor was made thicker to resist bullets. It became standard practice to proof a breastplate by firing a shot into it, usually in a conspicuous location., to demonstrate its degree of resistance. So an armor breastplate from later years would be unacceptable without such a dent, created by the maker of the armor.
View user's profile Send private message
Timothy Gulics




Location: NJ, US
Joined: 28 Jan 2004

Spotlight topics: 1
Posts: 353

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 5:26 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Of course, if firearms weren't available, there are always crossbows Wink
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Brian M




Location: Austin, TX
Joined: 01 Oct 2003

Posts: 500

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 8:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

Kenneth Enroth wrote:
How long did it take for guns to become the primary weapon after they were invented? My understanding is that the first guns were quite ineffective. I remember seeing a pic of a suit of armor with a dent on the breastplate supposedly caused by a bullet.


It took, arguably, until the 1600s (about 300 years of development) for firearms to really make hand-powered weapons and body armor completely obsolete. Well, I suppose body armor became obsolete in the 1600s, hand-powered wepons hung around longer.
The dented breastplates were the maker's "proof" of the piece, his guarantee that it had been tested. I think they sometimes "proofed" armor with a crossbow shot as well.

Brian M

edit--Doh! Someone beat me to it.
View user's profile Send private message
Roger Hooper




Location: Northern California
Joined: 18 Aug 2003
Likes: 1 page

Spotlight topics: 4
Posts: 4,393

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 8:53 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

A couple of people have mentioned the A&A poll-axe. I'll go with that too, in combination with the Albion Sovereign for close in work.


 Attachment: 51.9 KB
POLEAXEJ.jpg
Arms and Armor Poll-axe
View user's profile Send private message
Chad Arnow
myArmoury Team


myArmoury Team

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 9:19 am    Post subject:         Reply with quote

If I were fighting on horseback against foot soldiers, then I'd use my ArmArt. If in close quarters or on foot, either my Albion Sovereign (when it arrives) with a shield or my Armour Class basket with a targe and my Vince Evans dirk.
Happy

ChadA

http://chadarnow.com/
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Joel Whitmore




Location: Simmesport, LA
Joined: 25 Aug 2003

Posts: 342

PostPosted: Sat 27 Mar, 2004 5:25 pm    Post subject: I know what I'd take...         Reply with quote

My Cashen Anduril, A&A two-hander for those pesky horses (since I can't ride) and the Atrim 12th Century short sword ( Type XII). Also I'd bring a 4'x5' peice of 2" steel adn lotsa foul language so Patrick could run out of ammo shooting at me Laughing Out Loud Then I'd do him in with my last bottle of Scotch and some crawfish etouffe'. Man's gotta use his head in those post-apocolyptic scenerios.
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger


Display posts from previous:   
Forum Index > Off-topic Talk > Swords You'd Take Into Battle
Page 1 of 11 Reply to topic
Go to page 1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11  Next All times are GMT - 8 Hours

View previous topic :: View next topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum






All contents © Copyright 2003-2024 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Basic Low-bandwidth Version of the forum