Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Interesting stuff. I have a buff coat that's made of very soft, very supple 8mm thick leather (this is a historically correct thickness). These were accounted to provide good protection against most sword cuts.

This does fairly graphically show why people used metal armour where they could get their hands on it. Buff coats were used after metal armour was largely discarded as being useless against firearms. I have at least one account of a buff coat stopping a musket ball, though it was at long range and the chap (the French general the Conde) had a neck to knee bruise that laid him up for a week.

Cheers
Stephen
oh, and while I'm thinking about it, measuring leather in ounces, even for those of us old enough to remember what an ounce is, is meaningless to anyone outside America. Thicknesses are clear to anyone, but I don't have a clue what 6Oz, 10Oz leather actually means.

Why does America cling to Imperial measurements?

Oh, and I realised, my buff coat is shown in my avatar pic

Cheers
Stephen
If I am not mistaken, leather weight is by the square foot.

Why are bearings always measured in inches and spark plug threads always metric?

Cheers

GC
Quote:
Why does America cling to Imperial measurements?



Because it bothers the rest of the world?


Leather conversions: 5oz.= 5/64"
6oz.= 3/32"
7oz.= 7/64"
8oz.= 1/8"
9oz.= 9/64"
10oz.= 5/32" ect......

Basically it goes up by a /32" for every ounce. This is according to Weaver Leather Company's catalog.

Due to the slight variation in thickness through a hide typically the weight/thickness will be described as 7/8oz. for example when sold.
Stephen Hand wrote:
Interesting stuff. I have a buff coat that's made of very soft, very supple 8mm thick leather (this is a historically correct thickness). These were accounted to provide good protection against most sword cuts.


8mm thick, supple leather! What's it made of? How's it processed? Where can I get some?

neat.

-Steven H
The convention for most leather offered in the U.S. is that leather weight in oz will correspond approximately to 1/64" (0.39 mm) thickness per "oz weight."

A 16 oz grade of vegetable tanned leather will be close to 1/4" thick (6mm.) This is what is recommended by many today for boiling to make cuir bullii and hardened armour pieces (typically called sole bends as being adequate for bottoms or shoes/boots or hardened armour.)

I am not saying that it has to be this thick (or that it definitely was historically) so much as I am stating that it is what is consistently recommended today for safety and durability. It will not be cut through like butter, but can still be cut. It is not as tough as "vandal resistant" polypropylene plastics used to form rugged mail boxes and garbage cans. I have cut and thrust through 3/16" (4.75 mm) polypropylene plastics EASILY when I embarrassed myself in text cutting (missing targets and penetrating garbage can used as support prop) with both my Albion Knight and Munich swords.

This won't really change any of the conclusions already reached in the thread. It does make a difference in my opinion, in that I don't think someone will easily cut through the hardened form of leather unless they are deliberately drawing or slicing with the cut as part of their technique. I demonstrate this now to people by letting them push hard against "formed leather" (cell phone holsters, other scraps left over when I make something for them and throw some into boiling water) with a new razor blade or "Exacto" knife. Hardened leather does not cut well (hardly at all) simply by pushing a sharp knife with brute force. Given a little slicing or sawing action with a sharp edge, hardened leather can be cut surprisingly easily.
Now we've continued our tests, this time also with hardened leather. The results were of course different and these leather pieces could take much more punishment than the soft ones.
The tests clearly showed that (especially hardened) leather is able to protect from cuts but not from stabs. An axe is quite effective against hardened leather too but then again I guess it's effective against almost any type of armour. The pure impact force of an axe blow can be enough to seriously injure an opponent. Of course a gambeson underneath the leather armour would help though I cannot say how great the difference would be.

We also wanted to test the protection against projectiles but the only thing available was an atlatl. The dart (or throwing spear, whatever you like) has an iron tip. It was really interesting that it didn't completely penetrate the leather, instead it drove the whole lamellar that it hit into the styrofoam target. By the way, the atlatl is selfmade and not professional, same with the dart.

Well, enough talk for now... just have a look:

Part1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIWiqF9CjgY

Part2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jpuSzgkZN4

Part3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7L_EmI6V0S8

Part4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLGwNY3xMjM
Steven H wrote:
8mm thick, supple leather! What's it made of? How's it processed? Where can I get some?


The re-enactment group I was then a member of had a bunch of hides specially commissioned from a tannery. It cost an ungodly amount of money and we had to buy a lot of hides.

I'm not sure how they did it, but original buff leather was cured with fish oil. I have a pair of boots made by the leather craftsman at the Royal Armouries and they're traditionally cured and have a faintly (but by no means strong enough to be offensive) fishy odour.

Interestingly one of the hides we got had the neck leather in place at full thickness. It was 4-5cm thick!

Cheers
Stephen
8mm thick leather... I wonder how much protection this would offer if hardened. Well, maybe the same as with the thinner leather... good against cuts but minimal resistance against thrusts.

Has anyone ever tested the resistance of chain maille against thrusts?
Great tests.Thanks for sharing.Any chance for more tests?
Björn Kronisch wrote:
8mm thick leather... I wonder how much protection this would offer if hardened. Well, maybe the same as with the thinner leather... good against cuts but minimal resistance against thrusts.

Has anyone ever tested the resistance of chain maille against thrusts?


The short answer would be yes and a search on this site should show many discussion threads dealing with it.

BUT, it is on of those can of worms subjects were the validity of the tests gets people " hot and sometimes upset " as they argue about period validity of the test conditions i.e. the maille is different from period maille or the way the test is done is flawed etc ...... Personally I find these kind of tests interesting as long as one doesn't insist on pushing any of it as definitive proof of anything but just as a ballpark idea of what night be expected or even better only proof of what happens with the material used the way it was used in a specific test performed.

Something like: Modern made rivetted maille of Indian manufacture over a padded gambison on a human weight dummy suspended to be free moving resulted in .............. whatever happened in the tests.
Stephen Hand wrote:

Why does America cling to Imperial measurements?

Stephen


Blame the English. :lol:
Michal Plezia wrote:
Great tests.Thanks for sharing.Any chance for more tests?


I'm afraid this is not very likely since my girlfriend and I are currently busy with the preparations for our move to Norway. Besides, I don't have many ideas for further testing right now.
did you ever test boiled leather but in the lamellar form?
No, I didn't. I have not figured out yet how I can best deal with the problem of shrinking. If I just put the finished lamellars in boiling water they will shrivel so I cannot use them anymore.
you can't just put it in water individually and make the ''big thing'' later?
This is what I meant, if I put every single lamellar in boiling water it shrinks unpredictably.
I've heard that some people boil leather in linseed oil to make it hard...any ideas about that?
Gary A. Chelette wrote:
Stephen Hand wrote:

Why does America cling to Imperial measurements?

Stephen


Blame the English. :lol:


Because America is a lot further from Brussels and the EU than Britain is. :D
Felix Wang wrote:
Gary A. Chelette wrote:
Stephen Hand wrote:

Why does America cling to Imperial measurements?

Stephen


Blame the English. :lol:


Because America is a lot further from Brussels and the EU than Britain is. :D


And all those ceramic tyles on the shuttle would have to be redesigned to work in metric. :p ( Sorry, couldn't resist )

VERY OFF TOPIC, but short: Designed in the mid 1970's the whole shuttle concept needs to be brought into the 21 century with new concepts and new materials and maybe " metric " ;) :lol:

( Oh, I'm of an age were I still think in Imperial measurements first and translate to metric second, so I'm just joking and nothing profound or negative should be read into it. :D ).


Last edited by Jean Thibodeau on Fri 06 Jul, 2007 4:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Page 2 of 3

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum