Posts: 717 Location: Wisconsin, USA
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 3:53 pm
Update: Prince and Squire
Finally got some photos of the hilt component waxes for these two -- photos below. I will get Leif to take some good photos of the waxes all together for the News page.
Best,
Howy
Attachment: 26.38 KB

Attachment: 21.15 KB

Posts: 723 Location: Sweden
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 4:24 pm
I'm waxing lyrical... ;)
Posts: 3,646 Location: Midwest
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 4:29 pm
Like the prince better in the wax.
Posts: 559 Location: Stillwater N.J.
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 4:41 pm
Björn Hellqvist wrote: |
I'm waxing lyrical... ;) |
He's teasing us, can't you tell? :eek: ;)
Posts: 291 Location: Albany, NY
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 7:20 pm
The crossguard on the prince looks like it has changed from the initial design sketch.
Posts: 1,757 Location: Storvreta, Sweden
Thu 08 Jan, 2004 11:33 pm
Jay Barron wrote: |
The crossguard on the prince looks like it has changed from the initial design sketch. |
Yes, it did.
...or I did, I should say....
When working on this hilt trying out a few versions of the cross guard first planned for in the concept it became obvious the guard had too much 15th C style to fit on a sword of a 14th C type. I turned to the sword that inspired the shape of the pommel (XIV.6 on page 121 in "Records" as many of you have noted) and let the guard of that sword come through more strongly in a version for the "Prince".
What looks Ok in a drawing will not always be the best choise when working in full scale and three dimensions.
The kind of guard sketched on the drawing would also be put to best effect in a hollowground XVIII: one of those classic mid 15th C single hand arming swords. (No definite plans for this one yet, but it is one of those types that cry out to be made into an Albion Next Gen sword) This fact added to my decision to change the cross of the "Prince" to something with a clear 14th C feel to it.
Posts: 228 Location: Davis Monthan AFB, AZ
Fri 09 Jan, 2004 6:44 am
Personally I think the new cross is quite an improvement from the one pictured in the conceptual sketch; I prefer those crosses that have more of a gradual, graceful curve to them versus those with the abruptly downturned terminals. Very beautiful Peter! :)
Posts: 500 Location: Austin, TX
Fri 09 Jan, 2004 10:52 am
Nice! I'm partial to the X-XI-XII-XIIIs, but this XVI looks great. Looking at the sketches, I preferred the Squire to the Prince, but now I'm not so sure. The Prince's hilt does add more character.
Why can't I just win the lottery?
Brian M
Posts: 3,646 Location: Midwest
Fri 09 Jan, 2004 12:56 pm
Robert Zamoida wrote: |
Personally I think the new cross is quite an improvement from the one pictured in the conceptual sketch; I prefer those crosses that have more of a gradual, graceful curve to them versus those with the abruptly downturned terminals. Very beautiful Peter! :) |
Me too!
You
cannot post new topics in this forum
You
cannot reply to topics in this forum
You
cannot edit your posts in this forum
You
cannot delete your posts in this forum
You
cannot vote in polls in this forum
You
cannot attach files in this forum
You
can download files in this forum