Lutel kriegsmesser
I just got my second kriegsmesser.. and wow.. it's totally different than the first!! Here I'm saying that I think Lutel is "too" machine perfect (and they are) and too "cookie cutter".. but you know what? They're not cookier cutter at all.. they're actually quite different from one another. The blade shape/curve is absolutely different.. the thickness of the guard is different.. the thickness of the grip is different.. it's very interesting because it would appear that the hilts are made to fit the blades.. and there is variety to be found in the blade, so the hilt must accomodate it.

Interesting.


Last edited by Nathan Robinson on Tue 09 Dec, 2003 3:21 pm; edited 2 times in total
Yeah, checking the pics in your gallery with my Messer, I can see that the curvature on mine is slightly different, and that the guard-plate has four grooves instead of five. Seems like there's more to Lutel than meets the eye...
Björn Hellqvist wrote:
Yeah, checking the pics in your gallery with my Messer, I can see that the curvature on mine is slightly different, and that the guard-plate has four grooves instead of five. Seems like there's more to Lutel than meets the eye...


Wow! you're right.. the newer one I have has 4 grooves, while my old one has 5 grooves. They're also shaped differently and the cross-guards are flared and sized differently from eachother. The new blade is significanlty more curved than the old one. I don't know which curvature I like better, as they're both accurate and attractive. Overall, it's a very nice sword model and I will have to weigh and measure them to see other differences.

Pretty interesting.


Last edited by Nathan Robinson on Tue 09 Dec, 2003 3:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
We could measure the difference in curvature (I think the technical term is "sagitta") and compare the messers.


 Attachment: 4.08 KB
sagitta.jpg

Björn Hellqvist wrote:
We could measure the difference in curvature (I think the technical term is "sagitta") and compare the messers.

What's the derivation/origin of the word "sagitta" as it pertains to curvature?

It's also a name of a constellation of stars I think.
Björn Hellqvist wrote:
We could measure the difference in curvature (I think the technical term is "sagitta") and compare the messers.


Curvature:
The old one: .625" at the greatest
The new one: 1.125" at the greatest
The Swedish word is "pilhöjd", "arrowheight", and as "sagitta" is Latin for "arrow" (the constellation Sagittarius = the Archer), and it is logical when you think of the curve as a bow and the measurement as a very small arrow... I'm searching for the proper English term as we speak.
1½" at the greatest (as measured from an imagined line base of blade - point).
Found a definition (sort of): "sagittal curvature: An incorrect name for axial curvature, and an obsolete name for transverse curvature, both of which are axis-based curvatures."
I'll take photos in the next week or so of both pieces to show the differences.
I'll be watching for the new pictures. :) I keep thinking that when I get some money together I'll get one of these guys, but it hasn't happened yet. It is on my list, though...

Does the extra curvature change the 'feeling' of the way the sword should be handled a lot?
Two of them? Sheesh Nathan what are you up to? You aren't planning on having this one broken down are you?
Russ Ellis wrote:
Two of them? Sheesh Nathan what are you up to? You aren't planning on having this one broken down are you?

Yep. I have plans for one of 'em.

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum