hello all. I've been eyeing up the Armour class 16th century hand and a half for some time and am about ready to buy it. I would love some opinions on this sword. it seems pretty well put together, and the price is right. I would love to know how it handles, how it cuts. has anyone used a rebated version to spar? any insights you all could give me would be very helpful.

Mike,
This was moved to the Historical Arms Talk forum, which is for:

"Discussions of historic reproduction and authentic arms and armour from various cultures and time periods."

Using the search tool reveals this: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=1089

Mine had rebated edges and I liked it quite a bit as I mention in the above topic. Of the sharps I've seen/handled from Armour Class, none were particularly stallar cutters (not that they were bad).

Hello Mike and Folkert,


I bought Nathan's AC Bastard Sword from him a while back. My intended purpose for this sword was for WMA practice and for that it has served me quite well. My study group partners have been slowly weening off of wooden trainers and begun using steel blunts. Not that we will abandon wood altogether but there's just no substitute for the feel and handling of steel, not even aluminum. The AC is hefty in weight but the balance makes it feel very light. The thick cross section combined with a narrow profile allows for safe and controlled free play. The blade is quite flexible and appears soft in the temper but I've experienced no bends or deep nicks so far. In my search for a good solid steel trainer this sword has definately filled the niche.

I highly recommend it :D