Thanks
[ Linked Image ]

[ Download ]

[ Download ]

[ Download ]
Cornelius Engelhardt wrote: |
Hi!
This isn't an antique. It's a decoration piece. |
Håvard Kongsrud wrote: |
Are there any traces of mould lines? What size and weight is it? The blade looks like a distorted version of a Jan Petersen type B, And Aslak Liestøl 1976 type f, but the shape of the eye region points to the medieval or early modern period or later in a nordic context. Could one hazard a guess that it is a copper alloy cast from an original heavily corroded axe, abrased and polished before beeing left in a moist place for too long? |
Joe A wrote: | ||
We will check for mould lines. If the piece is common yellow brass with an artificial patina then it's probably just an artistic reproduction. Why it was made will remain a mystery. If the metal is historic bronze (copper/tin), the patina real and the wood as old as it appears then it may be an antique. |
Scott S. wrote: |
In addition to any other observations, I'd venture to say that most hand axes are not usually hafted like that, regardless of pins or wedges being used. As I understand it, when the axe head is mounted, the axe eye is slid up the length of the haft (which widens at the end) in order to work with centrifugal force. I may be entirely wrong, but I'm here to learn. |