16th century close helmets for foot combat?
Hello everyone, I am very interested in the 16th century knightly harness, especially the close helms. I was wondering if these were ever used by dismounted knights or other heavily armored soldiers and if so what they would look like. I would like to put together a 16th century harness intended for foot combat (SCA) some time in the future and I would like to know some options for helmets. The close helm is my favorite style of helmet looks-wise but I believe it was primarily used for mounted combat.

Can anyone help me find a style of 16th century close helm more optimized for foot combat? Does such a thing exist?

Thanks


 Attachment: 123.22 KB
image.jpg


 Attachment: 81.87 KB
image.jpg


 Attachment: 13.7 KB
image.jpg


 Attachment: 137.74 KB
Maybe something like this? [ Download ]

 Attachment: 75.74 KB
Or maybe this? [ Download ]
Well, unless I'm mistaken, the close helm was used in the 16th century as part of armours for tournaments on foot as well as for mounted combat. I've several photos of close helmets and their respective suits from 1540-1610. Some are definitely for use on foot. For foot combat in tournaments, heavier additional plates were often fitted to one side of the armour and the armour was only half length as the combat was fought at a waist-high barrier.

Another thing to consider is that important people often had garnitures of armour which several different options for field and tournament. Cavalrymen often wore open-faced (with optional falling-buff) burgonets in the mid-late 16th century instead of close helms. Diagrams of these garnitures, for example one by Michel Witz the Younger (1560), shows that the close helm was used on foot and for tournaments, while the burgonet was used on horse in the battle. Of course, for non-knightly soldiers, morions and other helmets were common on foot.

Here's an album of mainly 16th century harnesses with close helms, dating from 1540-1610. 1500-1540 they wore armets, which are admittedly quite similar. When in the 16th are you most interested in? Imgur album, 1540-1610
Theo Squires wrote:
For foot combat in tournaments, heavier additional plates were often fitted to one side of the armour and the armour was only half length as the combat was fought at a waist-high barrier.

I must add that it's not a general rule though. Because we can see full plate armour for tournament fights, such as various tonlet-armours and Henry VIII's famous foot combat armour.
Like these in Der Weisskunig?
WLB Cod.hist.fol. 271, fo.88v
http://digital.wlb-stuttgart.de/sammlungen/sa...age%5D=184


 Attachment: 233.46 KB
WLB Cod.hist.fol.271 fo088v (455x500).jpg


 Attachment: 95.54 KB
WLB Cod.hist.fol.271 fo088v-fthrs.jpg


 Attachment: 92.65 KB
WLB Cod.hist.fol.271 fo088v-Hlm1.jpg

Nice gallery, Theo. I would say I'm most interested in mid to late 16th century armor, around the time that the close helm and burgonet were in full use. I'm also interested in some early 17th century armor like the Savoyard burgonet, although it's too late in period for the SCA.

I don't usually see very many 16th century or other late period kits in SCA heavy combat. The primary interest is in earlier periods I imagine. I think it's most likely because it can be done very cheaply whereas I've seen burgonets and close helms go for a minimum of $800.

Not something I can afford now, but I would really like to have a 16th century kit someday. I guess it just gives me more time to research :)

Here's an illustration of a cuirasser. Did they actually wear close helms on the battlefield?


 Attachment: 124.95 KB
image.jpg

Mart Shearer wrote:
Like these in Der Weisskunig?
WLB Cod.hist.fol. 271, fo.88v
http://digital.wlb-stuttgart.de/sammlungen/sa...age%5D=184


Yes, kind of. What's the date on those?
Yes, cuirassiers often wore close helms.
Re: 16th century close helmets for foot combat?
M Lankin wrote:

Can anyone help me find a style of 16th century close helm more optimized for foot combat? Does such a thing exist?


The first photo you posted (one of 12 matching armours ordered by Christian I of Saxony from Anton Peffenhauser, 1590) was of an armour specifically designed for fighting on foot over the barrier, which is probably as good a 16th C analog as you will find for your purpose.
M Lankin wrote:
Mart Shearer wrote:
Like these in Der Weisskunig?
WLB Cod.hist.fol. 271, fo.88v
http://digital.wlb-stuttgart.de/sammlungen/sa...age%5D=184


Yes, kind of. What's the date on those?


circa 1513
there is a good hundred and more years between that early woodcut and the civil war cuirassier, a lot happens to armour in between. If I had to chose the best to fight in then the Peffenhauser, or its Greenwich equivalent, would be the epitome for the noblemas foot armour. For the more soldierly then Martin Bavin has one on on ebay here

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/English-closed-helm...2c9c2864cf

Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum




All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum