There is an interesting sword drawn in Figure 49 of Oakeshott's Sword in the Age of Chivalry (see below). It is said to be drawn from original art in 'The Gospels of Otto III' and depict the beheading of John the Baptist. Does anyone have the original image?
Its interesting to me because of:
- the two piece pommel - maybe intentionally anachronistic to look like 'biblical times' (the original art dates to 998).
- otherwise the long Ia cross and wide blade are consistent with other swords drawn in the book
- except, the fuller is drawn to be very narrow, which could make this an early depiction of a type XIa (assuming the drawing is accurate to the original art and the original art is an accurate depiction of a real weapon, which seems to be the case for other art in the book).
Again, would be nice to see the original art but I can't find it on-line.
-JD
Attachment: 77.57 KB
That would be BSB Clm 4453, which has yet to be fully digitized. Clm 4452 and 4454 are available as an example of the style, but not much use for your specific search:
http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/~db/0008/bsb00087481/images/
http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/~db/bsb00...index.html
http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/~db/0008/bsb00087481/images/
http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/~db/bsb00...index.html
In my opinion, the artist wanted to picture a type Y sword. It is the right period for them and the looks are right, he maybe just missed a bit of the concavity of the pommel... They even have the line separating "upper guard" and pommel. Maybe some of them are even two piece.
Attachment: 5.81 KB
Attachment: 6.51 KB
Attachment: 26.81 KB
Attachment: 29.8 KB
Attachment: 127.42 KB
[ Download ]
Attachment: 5.81 KB
Attachment: 6.51 KB
Attachment: 26.81 KB
Attachment: 29.8 KB
Attachment: 127.42 KB
[ Download ]
Luka Borscak wrote: |
In my opinion, the artist wanted to picture a type Y sword. It is the right period for them and the looks are right, he maybe just missed a bit of the concavity of the pommel... They even have the line separating "upper guard" and pommel. Maybe some of them are even two piece. |
I was thinking something similar Luka; Oakeshott called it an N, which would have been a century out of date, but a Y could have been drawn from life. Would be nice to see the original to see how ambiguous it was or was not.
By the way, have you seen the Michael Pikula version of your first pictured sword, owned by Tim Lison? That's a classic.
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum