It is such peculiar question, I do hope this was the right part of the forum to bring it up. I have the sad broken blade and hilt of a 19th century fencing foil, of that strange time when the art of the sword was in transforming from practicality to a mere sport. It is much like the attachment pictured.
I want to mount a new blade and furnish it with the historical hilt pieces. Yet there is a technicality that I would like to resolve before beginning on the project. Most historical examples of this type that are in good shape have a piece of leather (or sometimes of felt or another organic material) as a companion to the very open "figure 8" guard.,which really is barely a guard at all.
However, some examples have the leather on the outside of the guard, such as this one :http://img1.etsystatic.com/004/0/6144597/il_5...7_9ksi.jpg
Others have it on the inside, like this : http://p2.la-img.com/1605/38045/16193700_3_l.jpg
Why is there a variation? It would seem that the leather on the outside of the guard would deflect the sword point much better and prevent it from getting caught, yet many of the examples I see have the leather on the inside, which does look aesthetically more logical.
Also, the way the leather is held in place is not clear to me . If it is sandwiched in as part of the peened assembly, then I would think the compression of the leather would cause everything to eventually be loose. Yet if the leather isn't held on with the rest of the sword, how is it attached?
Hopefully some members here may have some knowledge about this , or own an example . If not, I understand that it is indeed an obscure question. Thanks !
Attachment: 27.91 KB
The big advantage of having the leather pad between the guard and hand is that if you take opposition incorrectly or make a bad parry you'll find out really quick because your opponent's blade will be caught between the guard and the pad. It's a good teaching tool but it can also be annoying which is why sometimes the leather pad was between the blade and the guard and why sometimes a solid shell was used instead. I fence classical foil competitively with the leather between the hand and guard, it only very rarely causes me any inconvenience and if it does it only takes a couple seconds to fix.
The pad itself is simply sandwiched in place but the guards on some antiques are very firmly fixed even when the pads are missing so I'd guess that these were probably a tight pressed fit.
The pad itself is simply sandwiched in place but the guards on some antiques are very firmly fixed even when the pads are missing so I'd guess that these were probably a tight pressed fit.
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum