I have had in my mind to get a sword that I could use in Bolognese fencing, but also in other styles that involve one-handed arming sword. I would prefer a weapon with a cut and thrust - blade, but with a simple cross hilt (no finger rings) and round disk pommel. Blunt of course. Did weapons like this exist in early/middle 16th century and can anyone give examples?

How about this Del Tin - DT6165

Also, check out this Sword put together by Sean Flynt. Look at his finished product on page 2.

Of course they do have a side ring, but no finger rings

If you are wanting a plain, cross hilted sword without any finger rings or complex hilt configurations, I think it would be best to look for examples of late Oakshott Type XVIII swords. There might be a few that meet your description. However, most single handed swords in the 16th century, particularly single handed swords, had some sort of additional hilt elements. I think, for the sake of accuracy, you are probably better off getting a slender 16th century blade with or without additional hilt elements, and use that.

swords of the "Henry V" style have been found on the Mary Rose. Type XVIII, simple downturned cross with wheel or globular pommel. so, you're safe with that form into the 1540s.

The horizontally recurved cross with globular pommel appears to have have been common, too.

I'm pondering another project of this type because I really like the whole concept. If I do that, it'll be on much the same line as this previous one, using either the H-T bastard or longsword blade and the same pommel treatment, but with a modified A&A Dürer cross.

I think that if you keep it simple, you can cover a wide chronological range with a sword like this. As far as I can tell, it would be more Italian than anything. Generic, unless you add some decorative detail to narrow the period. Filed pommel and quillon terminal, wire-bound grip, etc.

My earlier project, shown below from the inside perspective, shows what I would think is appropriate for both sides of the cross--no ring needed. With or without a ring, I'd prefer horizontally recurved quillons. This is a very handy weapon in this configuration and with that particular blade. Very quick, and very capable in the thrust and cut.

This is a relatively cheap setup, too, if you can do a bit of work on your own. The H-T blade is now around $130. An Alchem pommel is $12. A flat and flared cross is pretty easy to find and easy to recurve. You can definitely put together something nice for under $200 IF you can DIY. You might even be able to find a cheap Windlass or Hanwei rapier and saw off most of the bars of the hilt to make something of the earlier style.

---

 Attachment: 188.54 KB



 Attachment: 81.82 KB



 Attachment: 74.43 KB

Not normally my cup-o'-tea, but I looked at Sean's project and the pictures here, and am very pleased and amazed with the final result of the 'Italian Job.' Great lines--what sorts of techniques is it most appropriate for, though? What does it feel like it 'belongs' to?

Maybe the Albion Doge, the Machiavelli, the Condottiere with very minimal early complex guards:

http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/ne...an-xix.htm
http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/ne...an-xix.htm
http://www.albion-swords.com/swords/albion/ne...re-xix.htm

The A&A Knightly Riding sword with a simple guard:

http://www.arms-n-armor.com/sword036.html

Del Tin DT 6162 Early Italian Rapier:

http://www.kultofathena.com/product.asp?item=...ian+Rapier

Del Tin DT 2159 Venetian backsword, maybe ?
( Not sure if the Bolognese system works well with a single edged sword):

http://www.kultofathena.com/product.asp?item=...Back+Sword

I think the Bolognese style would work with any period appropriate sword with simple cross guard or simple guards with side rings and or knuckle bow guard. Even early rapier types would work with the system but probably with a wider cut and trust blade.

Ah, the swords in the Doge's palace! I visited the palace this summer. It was marvellous to see all those swords.

Sean, your sword is the style I am after, but a blunt training sword. The blade I can get from the Darkwood. No doupt also the hilt parts, but I would prefer recycled hilt.

Bill, so it seems. In those pictures the fencer is holding his finger over the quillon but not in all cases. So I gather that the choise is free. I personally prefer to keep my fingers behind the quillon, in extended classes I find it slightly uncomfortable to finger the quillon and anyway the fingers are safer in sparring my way.

Quess I just prefer to keep things simple. So I search something that I can use as a medieval/early renessaince arming sword but not tied too tightly to any specific era or style. Thank you all for the tips.

Nicholas Carew, ca. 1532

---

 Attachment: 205.25 KB



 Attachment: 214.59 KB

Two more

---

 Attachment: 30.39 KB



 Attachment: 24.49 KB

That would make a very nice custom sword. I have the Hanwei-Tinker longsword. Hmm.... get the hilt parts from Yeshua, make a handle myself... Blade to training version from Darkwood...

Just came across this one: http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?p=258321#258321

Apart from the finger ring, this is a good example of what I have in mind.