I'm searching for 15th century examples of original or presentations of burgonets.
Burgonets are a form specific to the 16th century (1500s). You may find an outlier or two that date to late in the century, but most books cite them as originating in the early 1500s.
There are some early examples in this thread.
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...mp;start=0
http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t...mp;start=0
I know one earlier example from Silesia.
Crucifixion Triptych from Gać (now National Museum in Warsaw), aroud 1450.
[ Linked Image ]
Crucifixion Triptych from Gać (now National Museum in Warsaw), aroud 1450.
[ Linked Image ]
Next :)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...tsveld.png
Frossait, Battle of Beverhoutsveld
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...tsveld.png
Frossait, Battle of Beverhoutsveld
The fresco at the Palazzo Publicco in Sienna http://www.myArmoury.com/talk/viewtopic.php?t=26001, created before 1407, has some helmets that could considered burgonets although these may be artistic shorthand. There are also other 14C artwork often depicting Roman soldiers wearing burgonets like helmets. So there may be evidence of burgonet like helmets before the 16th C.
Reliquary of St. Ursula by Hans Memling http://www.wga.hu/art/m/memling/4ursula/36ursu06.jpg 1489 c (of course that is pretty close to 16thc) has a has what looks like a proto burgonet to me. -located background centre left and wearing a red shirt and maybe getting shot in the back of the head-
Note: I as you likely know, when dealing with any image that shows a Roman soldier, the common counter argument is: The burgonet like helmet is added to show that this is a Roman and does not represent a helmet worn when the art work was created.
mackenzie
Reliquary of St. Ursula by Hans Memling http://www.wga.hu/art/m/memling/4ursula/36ursu06.jpg 1489 c (of course that is pretty close to 16thc) has a has what looks like a proto burgonet to me. -located background centre left and wearing a red shirt and maybe getting shot in the back of the head-
Note: I as you likely know, when dealing with any image that shows a Roman soldier, the common counter argument is: The burgonet like helmet is added to show that this is a Roman and does not represent a helmet worn when the art work was created.
mackenzie
And the next generations started to produce such form of helmet being inspirated by those fantastic pictures ;)
In my work, I wrote one article were I mentioned that problem. This is why I am sure that there is no sense in treating representations of helmets which were very popular in using about 25 years later, as fantastic imaginations.
In my work, I wrote one article were I mentioned that problem. This is why I am sure that there is no sense in treating representations of helmets which were very popular in using about 25 years later, as fantastic imaginations.
Mail leg harness, floating artulation on the knees and arms and burgonet like peaks/visor. These armours look very similar to armour in fresco at the Palazzo Publicco. Without the looking at the helmets, I would guess 1370s?
Attachment: 145.07 KB
I think it is by Spinello Aretino or of the same school
Source:
http://radikal.ru/F/s59.radikal.ru/i166/1002/be/6bef5cf3bfc9.jpg.html
Attachment: 145.07 KB
I think it is by Spinello Aretino or of the same school
Source:
http://radikal.ru/F/s59.radikal.ru/i166/1002/be/6bef5cf3bfc9.jpg.html
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum