
The blade is unsharpened (I plan to rectify that as soon as I can), but is properly tempered and can flex quite a ways out of true and still snap back straight. When I swapped the pommel, the weight dropped from 3 pounds 2.4 ounces to 2 pounds 14 ounces, while the P.O.B. shifted forwards slightly from 5-3/4" from the cross to 6-1/4" - still within historically accurate limits (if at the upper end) for a sword of this size and type. It was a great deal, as I got it for a scratch-'n'-dent price (minor flaw in scabbard leather, on the back where it isn't noticeable) of $89 plus shipping.
One of my very few complaints about this sword is the scabbard fittings. The locket came with the rather anachronistic stud for a belt frog (from what I have heard, they did not become available until the late 17th century at the earliest). I got the stud off - it was ridiculously easy, to the point where i would not have wanted to rely on it for combat use. The locket is only a tight friction fit, so I was able to tap it off and turn it around to hide the hole where the stud had been.
What I would like to know is, could the locket and chape on this scabbard be modified to look at least somewhat more "period correct" for, say, a 15th century footsoldier? Nothing fancy, of course - I am not trying to portray a nobleman - but better and more correct than what is on there? I have seen so few pictures of original fittings from that period. Most of what I have seen are Viking era.
Could someone please help me out here?