I could subtitle this as "My Second Burridge". But I won't.

Anyway, my collection of bronze age swords of Mycenae/Egypt/"Holy Land"/etc continued this month with an early Christmas gift to myself, a Neil Burridge Type G. I'd been wanting a thrusting sword that could have seen action in the Aegean, as well as being similar to types used by the Sherden, Peleset/Philistines and other "Sea Peoples", and the type G works for that, as far as I am aware. I had been reticent about the G, as inititally I thought it was 1. odd looking (it's much more attractive in person) and 2. probably a little shorter than I wanted (but really, it's not that short, the blade itself is about 19 inches -- but I initially wanted one of those longer "rapier" type swords, like one of the "C" series). Pics posted here (and elsewhere) by other G owners convinced me otherwise. So I sent Neil my order and he sent the sword in fairly short order (STILL suprised that it took shorter to get to my neck of the woods from the UK than I've experienced with many US domestic vendors!).

There's probably not much I can add here that hasn't already been said, either about Neil or his type G. The G blew me away, easily exceeding my expectations. It is light, fast, and deadly. The grip may seem restrictively small, but that is how it was designed and meant to be used -- gripped and used properly, this is not a problem. In fact, I feel the grip helps index the sword for an upward thrust from waist-level, and aims it right at the upper abdomen or solar plexus of an opponent -- this feels absolutely natural to me, anyway -- where a thrust will have the most effect. That's my pet theory, based on nothing more than an observation of this sword. If I'm right, then those ancients really did know what they were doing... now, the neat thing is that this sword can also be "fingered", using the "horns", and you can do all sorts of other thrusts, distracting (and even disabling) cuts, and other kinds of neat deadly tricks.

The sword Neil sent is also rather unique in that he added a little extra -- a gold band or insert, between the last grip rivet and the pommel. This was a neat cosmetic idea which really sets the sword off, an attractive addendum to an already attractive sword.

Anyway, to sum it all up, I really like this sword. It's a great sword for sticking it to those pesky Trojans, or Cannanites, or other bronze-age-ites. This is my second Neil Burridge bronze sword, and it won't be my last. If you want a bronze sword -- well, there's no where else to go, really. Neil is the King (Pharaoh? Chieftain?) of the modern reproduction bronze sword.
(http://www.bronze-age-swords.com/)

---

 Attachment: 95.73 KB



 Attachment: 107.35 KB



 Attachment: 93.81 KB



 Attachment: 81.13 KB

That is really attractive and congratulations for your good tastes and the great looking and functional bronze sword. :D :cool:

Beautiful sword by Neil, and fantastic taste on your part! :cool:

The type G and the khopesh are two beautiful swords. Which one do you think you might get next - one of the Naues?

I favor the European models, myself - Ewart Park, Limehouse, etc. - something about those leaf blades

NOT with yours, but I'd love to see some destructive testing done with a bronze sword, just to see how they really stand up to use.

I think the Witham looks pretty slick :cool:

Really nice sword David! Congratulations!

I enjoy reading about these bronze weapons as I always learn something,

I am curious as to what kind of edge is historical for these type of weapons? How sharp can bronze get? How does the edge hold? Is a less keen edge preferred as to keep a longer lasting edge?

I know this question may be a bit too broad so sorry if I haven't given enough traction.

Edges on swords were generally hollow beveled edges a few mm wide, by hammering and further sharpening. This results in hardened edges that were potentially very sharp (though sharpnes does vary from sword to sword a lot, depending on the skill and patience of the maker). Right behind the bevel is a thicker blade section, which makes that cuts don't go deeper then a few mm into the blade at most, actually not that much different compared to hardened steel swords with flat bevels. These beveled edges are seen from the earliest copper daggers, up to the latest bronze age swords. But there are also examples of swords with flat bevels or convex bevels. Those are a lot easier to make with the limited tools available in the bronze age. Hammering the hollow bevels isn't that difficult, but how to sharpen them afterwards is something I haven't quite figured out yet (at least not how to do it efficiently).