Could you say that the Cutting Sword had derived from the club or axe and the Thrusting Sword had derived from the spear?
Only in the most basic sense, and even then, I'm not so sure.
I imagine the sword came from the knife when someone decided to make one that could reach further. From there, variations appeared based on what they needed the weapon to do. Both cutting and thrusting actions are very natural, instinctive motions (punching and striking with the bare hands have both of these actions), so I don't suspect it took a lot of inspiration from other weapons. But who knows for sure?
I imagine the sword came from the knife when someone decided to make one that could reach further. From there, variations appeared based on what they needed the weapon to do. Both cutting and thrusting actions are very natural, instinctive motions (punching and striking with the bare hands have both of these actions), so I don't suspect it took a lot of inspiration from other weapons. But who knows for sure?
| Justin Pasternak wrote: |
| Could you say that the Cutting Sword had derived from the club or axe and the Thrusting Sword had derived from the spear? |
Nope. The double edged trusting sword developed from the early copper/bronze daggers roughly 3500-4500 years ago (depending on location, earlier in the middle east then in Europe), which in turn developed from earlier flint daggers. As the swords grew larger, and got a better hilt construction, they became cutting as well as thrusting swords, either leafshaped or with parallel edges. After that, you've got about 3 millenia with swords developing back and forwards into thrusting, cutting or cutting&thrusting swords, depending on the requirements of the period.
Here's an example of an Irish early bronze age dagger:
[ Linked Image ]
A British/Irish middle bronze age thrusting sword (bronze "rapier"):
[ Linked Image ]
And a late bronze age / early iron age cutting and thrusting sword (Gundlingen type):
[ Linked Image ]
| Bill Grandy wrote: |
| I imagine the sword came from the knife when someone decided to make one that could reach further. |
Yeah, if you consider a double edged dagger as knife. However, swords have been developed from knives more then once, eventhough there were already swords in use. F.e. in the late bronze age, single edged knives appeared made purely for combat, rather then just tools. These grew longer, and became falcatas and related single edged sword. In the early medieval period again single edged knives (saxes) were introduced into combat, and developed into single edged swords (langsaxes, single edged Viking swords etc.). It's not just reach b.t.w. which drove these weapons to grow longer. For cutting you need momentum, and momentum you increase either by increasing weight or length (or both). In case of the first swords that were true thrusting swords, it was purely reach though.
So all-in-all the sword is essentially a variation of the knife with a very long blade.
| Justin Pasternak wrote: |
| So all-in-all the sword is essentially a variation of the knife with a very long blade. |
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com — All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum