I cam across some images in some of my books that have me intrigued. We've all seen finger gauntlets and mitten gauntlets. But, there are apparently some that fall in between, which I called split-mitten for lack of a better term.
These have thumbs and places for pairs of fingers. Anyone have any more pictures of these? My own (limited) experience comes from finger gauntlets. What would be the advantages of things like these over finger or mitten gauntlets?
Attachment: 47.13 KB
Split mail mittens from Hefner-Alteneck's Medieval Arms & Armor
Attachment: 33.82 KB
Tonlet Armour of Charles V from Resplendence of the Spanish Monarchy
Attachment: 34.47 KB
Detail of gauntlet
Attachment: 74.88 KB
Drawing of harness
Last edited by Chad Arnow on Sat 04 Feb, 2006 12:24 pm; edited 1 time in total
I've heard these called bifurcated gauntlets. There is a pair at the NY Met.
Interesting term.
bifurcated
adj : divided into or made up of two parts
bifurcated
adj : divided into or made up of two parts
I've always called them the Ninja Turtle gauntlets, but yes, I've generally heard the term bifurcated. I imagine this is a modern term, though I don't know for certain.
As for advantages, in mail I guess it's a little easier to make. In plate it would imagine that it gives a little more shock absorbancy than typical finger gauntlets, with a little more dexterity than with mitten gauntlets. Though I don't know exactly what the benefit would be to having the fingers functiion this way as opposed to the other aforementioned designs. It doesn't seem to have a benefit in terms of weapons handling, in my opinion... perhaps it has to do with riding a horse? Perhaps something entirely else?
As for advantages, in mail I guess it's a little easier to make. In plate it would imagine that it gives a little more shock absorbancy than typical finger gauntlets, with a little more dexterity than with mitten gauntlets. Though I don't know exactly what the benefit would be to having the fingers functiion this way as opposed to the other aforementioned designs. It doesn't seem to have a benefit in terms of weapons handling, in my opinion... perhaps it has to do with riding a horse? Perhaps something entirely else?
Bill Grandy wrote: |
It doesn't seem to have a benefit in terms of weapons handling, in my opinion... perhaps it has to do with riding a horse? |
:idea:
When my father taught me to ride, he told me to hold the reins with the fore and middle fingers and thumb, while keeping my ring and little fingers curled as if in a fist. I don't know if this is a traditional way to grip the reins, but if it is, it might account for these bifurcated gauntlets.
Thats interesting. I don't know what the advantage would have been but I've seen this pattern used before. When armourers created prosthetic hands made of iron, like the appendages made for Gotz, they used this very pattern for the fingers. They moved in pairs and locked in place to hold items like a saddle harness. Just a thought...
Tonlet armours are for foot-combat.
James Arlen Gillaspie wrote: |
Tonlet armours are for foot-combat. |
I was under the impression that the tonlet, or at least a portion of it, could usually be removed to accommodate mounted combat. Have I been misinformed?
R. D. Simpson wrote: |
I was under the impression that the tonlet, or at least a portion of it, could usually be removed to accommodate mounted combat. Have I been misinformed? |
I don't think every tonlet armour was convertable. :) There is at least one famous example where part of the skirt is removeable to make the wearer able to ride, but this one doesn't seem to have that feature.
Chad Arnow wrote: | ||
I don't think every tonlet armour was convertable. :) There is at least one famous example where part of the skirt is removeable to make the wearer able to ride, but this one doesn't seem to have that feature. |
Thanks for the correction.
These split mittens where quite common in civilian use. They give a bit better manual dexterity than mittens, and are as such handy if you are going to perform actual work.
They where probably just directly adapted to armour, and probably has no great protection or handling advantage.
But they would be a lot easier to make than regular finger gauntlets...
They where probably just directly adapted to armour, and probably has no great protection or handling advantage.
But they would be a lot easier to make than regular finger gauntlets...
I found another nice example of a bifurcated gauntlet on Jason Grimes' site, but it's a private gallery, so I can't reproduce the image. He dated it to the late 15th century. Out of curiousity, can someone give me the approximate date that the Charles V tonlet harness was made?
Thanks!
-Gregory-
Thanks!
-Gregory-
Gregory J. Liebau wrote: |
Out of curiousity, can someone give me the approximate date that the Charles V tonlet harness was made?
|
The book lists it as 1520-1530.
It is not uncommon for harness of this type (and this Charles V harness is a perfect example) to have a heavy (relatively speaking) mitten gauntlet on the right hand and a split mitten of some sort on the left. When I saw this harness in Madrid, it was in a case with a similar harness, only its left gauntlet had THREE fingers together and an articulated pinkie (!). Speaking for myself as someone who makes and uses armour, this is the sort of arrangement I would ideally prefer, only possibly a full-blown fingered gauntlet on my left hand. It's the fingers that tend to get hit on the right hand, and the knuckles on the left.
Anyone has some more info on the bifurcated gauntlet in this old video?
http://youtu.be/NjKbi7YUNaI?t=8m30s
[ Linked Image ]
Attachment: 363.05 KB
Bifurcated gauntlet from the MET video from 1920 [ Download ]
http://youtu.be/NjKbi7YUNaI?t=8m30s
[ Linked Image ]
Attachment: 363.05 KB
Bifurcated gauntlet from the MET video from 1920 [ Download ]
Last edited by Peter Törlind on Mon 11 Aug, 2014 10:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Peter: great video - thanks!
I've also recently become interested in bifurcated gauntlets, especially those with mail on the fingers. At The Armour Archive last year, Jason Grimes wondered if these may have been used with crossbows, as they give more finger dexterity than fully-plated fingers; the question was then asked if they'd provide enough dexterity to remove arrows/bolts from quivers ... if anyone has any documented sources or strong opinions on this design, I'd be interested in hearing them.
In the meantime, here's a pair from the Bayerisches Armeemuseum Museum Ingolstadt. Pic is from Arma Bohemia's website; they're currently offering a pair based on them.
Attachment: 110.84 KB
I've also recently become interested in bifurcated gauntlets, especially those with mail on the fingers. At The Armour Archive last year, Jason Grimes wondered if these may have been used with crossbows, as they give more finger dexterity than fully-plated fingers; the question was then asked if they'd provide enough dexterity to remove arrows/bolts from quivers ... if anyone has any documented sources or strong opinions on this design, I'd be interested in hearing them.
In the meantime, here's a pair from the Bayerisches Armeemuseum Museum Ingolstadt. Pic is from Arma Bohemia's website; they're currently offering a pair based on them.
Attachment: 110.84 KB
Page 1 of 1
You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
All contents © Copyright 2003-2006 myArmoury.com All rights reserved
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum
Discussion forums powered by phpBB © The phpBB Group
Switch to the Full-featured Version of the forum