Hello,

I wanted to get some opinions as to which of these belts you think looks best/most historically accurate this style of sword. Also, why do you think so?

Here is the sword:

---

 Attachment: 16.37 KB

And here are the belts:

---

 Attachment: 3.06 KB



 Attachment: 4.3 KB



 Attachment: 2.96 KB



 Attachment: 8.79 KB

Personally I prefer G slightly to the others, but it seems a bit too early period for that syle of hilt. Please let me know your opinions.

E Is the most likely candidate for giving the look that's closest to being historically correct for that sword.

D&G have a look that's a bit too early with all of the interlacing, F just doesn't look right all the way around.

I've just checked Lutel's site. From what I gathered, these swords are already finished, and ready to be shipped. From the description, I gathered it is without scabbard, so you'd probably pay extra for it.

Mind you, this is what I gather from the description, if you really want to be sure, you'll have to contact Lutel themselves.

I dunno. Almost all of Lutel's swords come with scabbards, a simple hanger, and a belt. This excludes the two-handers, however. When unspecified, you generally get "F" in my experience.

I'm with Patrick on D and G looking too early for that kind of sword.

I'd probably go with E.

Completely of topic, but is that a Lutel sword or is it by somebody else?

...and do you have any more pictures of it? :D

"E" to me seems the most era appropriate match for the blade

I'd say that E seems to go with the sword the best. F seems to me to be a little too late period.

G is pretty sexy, though. ;)

E is what we use for that type of sword in our re-enactment group.

I've got a lutel longsword, with the G type scabbard. I far prefer my brothers E type scabard, though. The front strap makes it much more stable.

All the lutels, except the rapiers and Zweihanders, come with a scabbard of your choice.